National Academies Press: OpenBook

When Weather Matters: Science and Services to Meet Critical Societal Needs (2010)

Chapter: Appendix B: NCEP Review Executive Summary

« Previous: Appendix A: Gaps in Knowledge and Practice for the Next Decade in Urban Meteorology
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: NCEP Review Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2010. When Weather Matters: Science and Services to Meet Critical Societal Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12888.
×

B
NCEP Review Executive Summary

Executive Summary of the 2009 Community Review of the NCEP Office of the Director1


Carried Out by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research


NCEP Review Executive Committee:

Frederick Carr, co-chair

James Kinter, co-chair

Gilbert Brunet

Kelvin Droegemeier

Genene Fisher

Ronald McPherson

Leonard Pietrafesa

Eric Wood


April 2010

1

 This executive summary and the complete report from which it has been extracted are available, together with the detailed individual reviews of the nine NCEP centers, at: http://www.vsp.ucar.edu/events/NCEP_reviews_2009.html.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: NCEP Review Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2010. When Weather Matters: Science and Services to Meet Critical Societal Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12888.
×

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR) was requested in November 2008 by the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) to facilitate a thorough and thoughtful community review of the nine centers that comprise NCEP, as well as the NCEP Office of the Director. This report summarizes the review of the Office of the Director (OD).

The vision of “NCEP as a whole” being greater than the sum of its parts is being realized but is also a work in progress. NCEP is performing well in its primary mission of providing products and services in support of protecting life and property in a timely manner. Many of its service centers are recognized as world leaders in their particular missions. The interactions between centers are increasing, although improvement is needed in this area. The Review Panel commends the strong leadership of the NCEP Director and his staff members for the significant progress NCEP has made over the past decade. NCEP’s mission is unique in the U.S., and has been noted as a “national resource”; as such, it has the opportunity to leverage this leadership and respect to achieve higher goals.

This is a very crucial, perhaps watershed, moment for NCEP in which effective leadership and resources are essential if NCEP is to regain/retain its competitive advantage in the world. Important decisions are imminent on how to lead and resource a large number of key initiatives, possibly in competition with other agencies or even other National Weather Services (NWS) and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) programs.

The fundamental challenge within NCEP is that it is under-resourced for its mission. Each center reported that it is providing more services and products, with additional requests in the pipeline, with roughly the same number of personnel since the last review. At the Environmental Modeling Center (EMC) of NCEP, the numerous additional demands for improved or new modeling and data assimilation systems added to an already broad mission has precluded any one system from being considered “world-best.”

There is sentiment in the community that EMC is not equipped to fulfill its mission or realize its vision, i.e., it cannot deliver world-leading models with its current structure and broad mission, for which it is under-resourced. The EMC mission should be carefully evaluated and either reduced in scope to align with the resources or the resources should be increased to align with the broad mission. This should be done in combination with a comprehensive plan to initiate partnerships with other modeling groups within

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: NCEP Review Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2010. When Weather Matters: Science and Services to Meet Critical Societal Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12888.
×

NOAA, other federal agencies and the academic community. The latter is recommended owing to EMC’s reputation for being unreceptive to external collaboration, a perception that often (unfairly) characterizes NCEP as a whole. NCEP personnel are correct to note that the research community has a lack of appreciation of the constraints that are imposed by the requirements for timeliness, dependability and accuracy on any operational center. Nevertheless, better understanding and cooperation between operational and research scientists are absolutely essential for NCEP to fully achieve its mission.

For the NOAA numerical weather and climate prediction endeavor to serve the nation adequately and be comparable to those that are the best in the world, NCEP must:

  • Create a culture and work environment that attracts an extraordinary cadre of talented scientists skilled in various aspects of numerical weather and climate prediction. This will require innovative personnel policies, a much greater fraction of civil service positions, opportunities for advancement based on scientific and technological contributions, and systematic mechanisms and commitments for ensuring cooperation and collaboration with the national and international modeling communities.

  • Deploy computer capabilities that are comparable to or better than those of other major international centers. This will require a substantial increase in computer power and data management and storage facilities.

  • Provide adequate human resources to meet the stated operational mission.

  • Embrace an entirely new approach to model development and implementation. This will require a substantial effort to focus on creating a single, powerful, flexible, multi-scale atmosphere-ocean-land-surface modeling approach that can be specialized to specific resolutions and time scales. It should be an effort that involves the entire national weather modeling community and engages partners from other agencies, academia, and the private sector.

In addition to taking these steps toward achieving excellence, the Office of the Director should consider the following critical issues:

  1. External Advice

    The National Centers for Environmental Prediction needs external advice on both scientific aspects of its mission and the further development of its products and services. To enhance its linkage to both the

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: NCEP Review Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2010. When Weather Matters: Science and Services to Meet Critical Societal Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12888.
×

research and private sector communities, NCEP should request from NOAA Headquarters that a science and services advisory board be established.

  1. Administrative Workload

    The large workload associated with the Office of the Director has grown significantly along with the NCEP mission and budget over the past decade. NCEP requires a Deputy Director who can handle the day to day operations of NCEP as well as many other internally-directed duties, freeing up the Director to think more strategically and forge new collaborations and partnerships within NOAA, the federal government, the US academic community, the private sector and abroad. Also, the vacancy in the position of NCEP Chief Operations Officer should be filled.

  2. Future Reviews

    In order to preclude large periods of time transpiring before the next set of reviews, NCEP should formalize a periodic review process, to occur every 5–6 years.

These issues are more fully developed in section 5 of this report, and a detailed set of findings and recommendations that address the points above are given in section 6.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: NCEP Review Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2010. When Weather Matters: Science and Services to Meet Critical Societal Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12888.
×
Page 159
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: NCEP Review Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2010. When Weather Matters: Science and Services to Meet Critical Societal Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12888.
×
Page 160
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: NCEP Review Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2010. When Weather Matters: Science and Services to Meet Critical Societal Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12888.
×
Page 161
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: NCEP Review Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2010. When Weather Matters: Science and Services to Meet Critical Societal Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12888.
×
Page 162
Next: Appendix C: Acronyms and Abbreviations »
When Weather Matters: Science and Services to Meet Critical Societal Needs Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $60.00 Buy Ebook | $47.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The past 15 years have seen marked progress in observing, understanding, and predicting weather. At the same time, the United States has failed to match or surpass progress in operational numerical weather prediction achieved by other nations and failed to realize its prediction potential; as a result, the nation is not mitigating weather impacts to the extent possible.

This book represents a sense of the weather community as guided by the discussions of a Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate community workshop held in summer 2009. The book puts forth the committee's judgment on the most pressing high level, weather-focused research challenges and research to operations needs, and makes corresponding recommendations. The book addresses issues including observations, global non-hydrostatic coupled modeling, data assimilation, probabilistic forecasting, and quantitative precipitation and hydrologic forecasting. The book also identifies three important, emerging issues—predictions of very high impact weather, urban meteorology, and renewable energy development—not recognized or emphasized in previous studies. Cutting across all of these challenges is a set of socioeconomic issues, whose importance and emphasis—while increasing—has been undervalued and underemphasized in the past and warrants greater recognition and priority today.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!