National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$32.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

S&T Strategies of Six Countries: Implications for the United States (2010)
Standing Committee on Technology Insight-Gauge, Evaluate & Review (TIGER)
Committee on Global Science and Technology Strategies (GSTS)

Citation Manager

. "1 Introduction." S&T Strategies of Six Countries: Implications for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
7
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


S&T Strategies of Six Countries: Implications for the United States

BOX 1-1

Statement of Task

An ad hoc committee will examine the science and technology (S&T) strategies of Brazil, Russia, India, China, Japan, and Singapore and the relevance of those strategies to U.S. national security. The committee will compare and contrast U.S. S&T strategy planning by federal and nonfederal sources to that of the selected nations and evaluate the implications of any differences for U.S. national security strategy.


Specifically, the committee will:

  • Assess key foreign national S&T planning—derived from various national position documents—with special relevance to U.S. national security objectives, evaluate the current, mid-term (3-5 years), and long term (10+ years)* strategies of each, and estimate the expected timeline for the achievement of national S&T goals.

  • Identify potentially high-impact areas being pursued by the identified countries (possibly including advanced energy technology, advanced physics, neuroscience, or nanoscience) and identify the potential impact of these areas on national security.

  • Recommend nation-specific indicators for each country that could be used to effectively monitor progress in high-impact research. These could include:

    • National research priorities and drivers

    • Funding sources (government, industry) and allocation across fields

    • Financial and human resource allocation

    • Intellectual property (e.g., published papers, patents, and rate and distributional changes thereof)

    • Management: overall policy, work force planning, and mechanisms of execution

    • Other internal and external factors impacting strategy (e.g., global financial climate, demography, environmental issues, incentives for success, and penalties for failure)

  • Analyze relationship between foreign S&T strategy and military capability

  • Offer key recommendations to the U.S. government and the IC on the application of the identified strategies to the United States

  

*The committee found that most plans of the six countries it studied do not have a 10-year outlook, and so it was not able to comment on this timeframe.

As a result of these countries’ S&T strategies and of the current climate of free-flowing and inexpensive access to information, maintaining scientific and technological assets and preventing technological surprise will continue to be a major challenge for the U.S. government and its intelligence community.

REPORT ORGANIZATION

This report covers the S&T strategies of the JBRICS countries and the relevance of those strategies to U.S. national security. Chapter 2 outlines the methodology developed by the committee used to create the report. Chapters 3 through 8 describe the strategy and goals of each of the six selected countries, and consider other significant factors that affect each nation’s innovation environment. Each of these chapters ends with a net assessment of the country’s current progress and predicts advancement in key technology areas relevant to U.S. national security. These chapters also highlight unique, nation-specific metrics that can be used to track each country’s progress toward achieving its goals and points out key observations and implications for U.S. national security. Chapter 9

Page
7