EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2008a. EPA Staff Technical Report: Cost and Effectiveness Estimates of Technologies Used to Reduce Light-Duty Vehicle Carbon Dioxide Emissions. EPA420-R-08-008. Washington, D.C.

EPA. 2008b. The use of markup factors to estimate indirect costs. Presentation from National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, to the Committee on Assessment of Technologies for Improving Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy, National Research Council, March 31, Washington, D.C.

FEV, Inc. 2009. Light-duty technology cost analysis overview. Presentation to the Committee on the Assessment of Technologies for Improving Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy, March 16, Washington, D.C.

IBIS Associates, Inc. 2008. Data Collection and Analysis: Vehicle Systems Costs. Report to the Committee on Assessment of Technologies for Improving Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy, National Research Council, December, 2008, Waltham, Mass.

Kolwich, G. 2009. Light-Duty Technology Cost Analysis Pilot Study. Report FEV 07-069-103F. Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ann Arbor, Michigan, September 3. FEV, Inc., Auburn Hills, Mich.

Ludtke and Associates. 2004. Perform Cost and Weight Analysis, Head Protection Air Bag Systems, FMVSS 201. DOT HS 809 842. December. U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Martec Group, Inc. 2008a. Variable costs of fuel economy technologies. Presentation to the Committee on Assessment of Technologies for Improving Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy, National Research Council, January 24, Detroit, Mich.

Martec Group, Inc. 2008b. Variable Costs of Fuel Economy Technologies. Report prepared for the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers. June 1. Washington, D.C.

NESCCAF (Northeast States Center for a Clean Air Future). 2004. Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Light-Duty Motor Vehicles. Available at http://www.nesccaf.org/documents/rpt040923ghglightduty.pdf. Accessed July 6, 2009.

NRC (National Research Council). 2002. Effectiveness and Impact of Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

OTA (Office of Technology Assessment). 1995. Advanced Automotive Technology: Visions of a Super-Efficient Family Car. OTA-ETI-638. Washington, D.C.

Rogozhin, A., M. Gallaher, and W. McManus. 2009. Automobile Industry Retail Price Equivalent and Indirect Cost Multipliers. Report by RTI International to Office of Transportation and Air Quality. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. RTI Project Number 0211577.002.004. February. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

Vyas, A., D. Santini, and R. Cuenca. 2000. Comparison of Indirect Cost Multipliers for Vehicle Manufacturing. Center for Transportation Research, Argonne National Laboratory. April. Argonne, Ill.

Wene, C. 2000. Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy. International Energy Agency, Paris.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement