The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Technology for a Quieter America
Occupational Noise Exposure, Hearing ProtectionDevices, Impact On: Productivity, Communications,Safety, Quality of Life
Lee Hagar, Sonomax Hearing Healthcare, Inc.
Metrics for a Cost-Benefit Analysis of Noise Reduction(Brainstorming a Methodology of This Type ofAnalysis)
Katherine Harback, MITRE Corporation
Potentially Hazardous Noise for Users of ConsumerProducts—Personal Music Devices, Children’s Toys,Recreational Vehicles
William Martin, Oregon Health Sciences University
The Nature and Extent of Complaints about Noise(Suburban, Urban, Rural) and Public Demand forQuiet Environments and Products
Les Blomberg, Noise Pollution Clearing house
Technical Issues with Respect to Metrics/Descriptorsfor Community Noise (Annoyance, ActivityInterference, Noticeability)
Nicholas Miller, Harris Miller Miller & Hanson Inc.
Noise Insulation (from Aircraft and Highway, etc.) inHomes to Control Noise Exposure and Improve Qualityof Life
Ben Sharp, Wyle Acoustics Group
Noise Control Engineering Education and WorkforceDevelopment
David Wormley, Pennsylvania State University
Annoyance from Noise as a Quality-of-Life Issue, andIts Relationship to Other Sources of Annoyance
Larry Finegold, Finegold & So, Consultants
Future Directions in the Design of Noise Barriers, QuietVehicles, and Quiet Pavements
Gregg Fleming, John A. Volpe National TransportationSystems Center
Noise Standards and Design Issues for Rooms (Schools,Hospitals, Offices, etc.)
Richard Peppin, Scantek, Inc.
Technology for the Design of Products with LowerNoise and Better Sound Quality
Gordon Ebbitt, Carcoustics
Richard Topping, TIAXLLC
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSISOF TRANSPORTATIONNOISE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY
Organized by the National Academy ofEngineeringand Hosted by the Volpe Center
Cambridge, Massachusetts
February 22–23, 2007
Opening Remarks
Ian Waitz, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,Subcommittee Chair
Gregg Fleming, Volpe Center, Workshop Host
An Environmental Economist’s Perspective on Cost-Benefits Analysis
Sabrina Lovell, formerly with the EnvironmentalProtection Agency
The O’Hare Residential Sound Insulation Programand Acceptance in Communities, and Sound InsulationOrdinance
Arlene Mulder, Mayor, Village of Arlington Heights,Illinois
The Federal Highway Administration’s Noise Programand Rules for Noise Barrier Construction
Mark Ferroni, Federal Highway Administration
Federal Highway Administration and State Activitiesin the Design of Quiet Pavements: Construction,Maintenance, and Life Cycle Issues
Mark Swanlund, Federal Highway Administration
Reductions in Noise Emissions from Porous Highways:Current State of the Technology in the USA andEurope
Paul Donavan, Illingsworth Rodkin
Discussion of European Activities Related to Cost-Benefit Analysis and Highway Noise
George Maling, Institute of Noise Control Engineering ofthe U.S.A.
Ulf Sandberg, Swedish National Road and TransportResearch Institute
Cost-Benefit Analysis and Transportation Noise
Jon Nelson, The Pennsylvania State University
Discussion of Construction Process, Costs,Maintenance, Performance Characteristics, and NoiseLevels of Rubber-Modified Asphalt Highways
Michael Blumenthal, Rubber Manufacturers Association