and structure and aim to deliver it to the sponsor within 1 month after the meeting. The date of delivery of the letter report will be contingent on when the meeting is scheduled and timely input of information from the representatives of the Partnership.

  1. Review and assess the actions that have been taken in response to recommendations from the NRC Phase 2 review of the Partnership.

  2. Write a final report documenting its conclusions and recommendations.

ATTACHMENT III
PRESENTATIONS AND DISCUSSIONS WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF THE PARTNERSHIP AT THE COMMITTEE MEETING, APRIL 27, 2009

Changes in Objectives in the Partnership

Sunita Satyapal and Patrick Davis, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

  • General priorities being set by the Secretary

  • Major initiatives that might influence Partnership

Budget Outlook (FY09-10)

Sunita Satyapal and Patrick Davis, EERE, DOE

  • Overall Level of Resources

  • How are Resource Allocations Changing?

  • How Does Stimulus Plan/Loan Program Affect Partnership?

Overview and Progress & Outlook on Existing Program Efforts

Sunita Satyapal and Patrick Davis, EERE, DOE

  • Progress and outlook for meeting future targets, especially with regard to critical technologies, and optimistic and pessimistic views and the need for (or lack of) changes in projected timescales

  • Where has the program made significant progress?

  • Where has progress not been adequate?

  • Do targets and milestones need to be changed?

Automotive Industry Partners’ Views on Progress, Strategy, Future Outlook, and Structure of Program

William Peirce, General Motors Corporation; Reginald Modlin, Chrylser LLC; and John Sakioka, Ford Motor Company



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement