. "5 Nutritional Considerations for Adults." Child and Adult Care Food Program: Aligning Dietary Guidance for All. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Child and Adult Care Food Program: Aligning Dietary Guidance for All
zation, and they tend to lose lean body mass over time (Gaffney-Stomberg et al., 2009).
Selected Nutrients with an Adequate Intake
Intakes of selected nutrients that have an Adequate Intake (AI) rather than an EAR are shown in Table 5-3, by age group and gender, along with the respective AI. The mean and median NHANES (2003–2004) intakes for calcium, potassium, and fiber are lower than the AI for most of these adult age-gender groups, suggesting that the majority of individuals do not meet this target recommendation. Women have lower intakes than do men, with mean and median potassium intakes less than half the α-linoleic and α-linolenic acid intakes are close to the AI on average.
TABLE 5-3 Comparison Between Median Nutrient Intakes from NHANES (2003–2004) and the Adequate Intake (AI), by Age Group (in years) and Gender
19–59 Years
≥ 60 Years
Males
Females
Males
Females
Calcium (mg/d)
AI
1,044
1,044
1,200
1,200
Mean intake
1,068
790
846
702
Median intake
1,003
758
798
654
Potassium (mg/d)
AI
4,700
4,700
4,700
4,700
Mean intake
3,182
2,342
2,866
2,327
Median intake
3,112
2,292
2,787
2,290
Fiber (g/d)
AI
36.2
24.1
30.0
21.0
Mean intake
17.3
13.4
16.4
13.8
Median intake
16.3
12.7
15.7
13.4
Linoleic acid (g/d)
AI
16.3
11.8
14.0
11.0
Mean intake
18.8
14.2
15.1
12.3
Median intake
17.9
13.4
14.2
11.5
α-linolenic acid (g/d)
AI
1.6
1.1
1.6
1.1
Mean intake
1.9
1.4
1.5
1.3
Median intake
1.8
1.3
1.4
1.2
NOTES: AI = Adequate Intake; g/d = grams per day; mg/d = milligrams per day. Bold font indicates mean intake values lower than the AI.
SOURCES: Intake data from NHANES 2003–2004. The AIs used in the analysis were from the DRI reports (IOM, 1997, 2002/2005, 2005). AIs shown for the 19–59-year-old age group are weighted averages of two DRI age groups.