|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy. in detail. The committee concerned itself primarily with the waste materials that have been or could have been in contact with agent during the life of the facility. Material not in those categories is discussed in an earlier report on secondary waste (NRC, 2008). Waste of a general industrial or commercial nature can be managed as such waste materials are routinely handled. Therefore, the committee considered that it could not contribute additional advice regarding their management. Throughout the report, findings and recommendations follow the relevant discussion. REFERENCESOTA (Office of Technology Assessment). 1992. Disposal of Chemical Weapons: An Analysis of Alternatives to Incineration. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. NRC (National Research Council). 2002. Closure and Johnston Atoll Chemical Agent Disposal System. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. NRC. 2008. Review of Secondary Waste Disposal Planning for the Blue Grass and Pueblo Chemical Agent Destruction Pilot Plants. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
|
|
|||||||||||||||
