National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 10 Synthesis of Key Questions for the Workshop
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2010. Facilitating Climate Change Responses: A Report of Two Workshops on Knowledge from the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12996.
×
Page 143
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2010. Facilitating Climate Change Responses: A Report of Two Workshops on Knowledge from the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12996.
×
Page 144
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2010. Facilitating Climate Change Responses: A Report of Two Workshops on Knowledge from the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12996.
×
Page 145
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2010. Facilitating Climate Change Responses: A Report of Two Workshops on Knowledge from the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12996.
×
Page 146

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

References Abrahamson, V., Wolf, J., Lorenzoni, I., Fenn, B., Kovats, S., Wilkinson, P., Adger, W.N., and Raine, R. (2009). Perceptions of heat-wave risks to health: Interview-based study of older people in London and Norwich, UK. Journal of Public Health, 1(1), 119-126­­­­­­­. Bazerman, M.H., and Watkins, M.D. (2004). Predictable Surprises—The Disasters You Should Have Seen Coming and How to Prevent Them. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Bostrom, A., Morgan, M.G., Fischhoff, B., and Read, D. (1994).What do people know about global change? 1. Mental models. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 14, 375-387. Burt, R.S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 349-399. Carson, R. (196­­­­­­­2). Silent Spring. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Dietz, T., Gardner, G.T., Gilligan, J., Stern, P.C., and Vandenbergh, M.P. (2009). Household 2009). actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce U.S. carbon emissions. Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 18,452-18,456­­­­­­­. Douglas, M., and Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Tech- nological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press. Dunlap, R.E., and McCright, A. (2008). A widening gap: Republican and Democratic views on climate change. Environment, 0(5), 26­­­­­­­-35. Dunlap, R.E., and McCright, A. (2010). Climate change denial: Sources, actors and strategies. In C. Lever-Tracy (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Climate Change and Society (Chapter 14, Part IV: Social Recognition of Climate Change). New York: Routledge. Ebi, K.L., Smith, J., and Burton, I. (Eds.). (2005). Integration of Public Health with Adapta- tion to Climate Change. Oxford, England: Taylor & Francis. Ehrhardt-Martinez, K., Donnelly, K.A., and Laitner, J.A. (2010). Advanced Metering Initiatives and Residential Feedback Programs: A Meta-Review for Household Electricity-Saving Opportunities. Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy. Farber, D.A. (2007). Basic compensation for victims of climate change. University of Penn- sylvania Law Review, 1, 1,6­­­­­­­05-1,6­­­­­­­56­­­­­­­. Available: http://www.pennumbra.com/issues/ pdfs/155-6­­­­­­­/Farber.pdf [accessed September 2010]. 14

144 FACILITATING CLIMATE CHANGE RESPONSES Fischhoff, B. (1982). Debiasing. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky, Eds. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Part VIII: Corrective Procedures, Chapter 31, pp. 422-445). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Fleishman, L., Bruine de Bruin, W., and Morgan, M.G. (2010). Informed public preferences for electricity portfolios with CCS and other low-carbon technologies. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 0(9), 1,399-1,410. Gardner, G.T., and Stern, P.C. (2002). Environmental Problems and Human Behavior, Second Edition. Boston: Pearson. Gardner, G.T., and Stern, P.C. (2008). The short list: The most effective actions U.S. house- holds can take to curb climate change. Environment, 0(5), 12-21. Granade, H.C., Creyts, J., Derkach, A., Farese, P., Nyquist, S., and Ostrowski, K. (2009). Un- locking Energy Efficiency in the U.S. Economy. McKinsey Global Energy and Materials. Available: http://www.mckinsey.com/clientservice/electricpowernaturalgas/downloads/ US_energy_efficiency_full_report.pdf [accessed August 2010]. Jacques, P.J., Dunlap, R.E., and Freeman, M. (2008). The organization of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental skepticism. Environmental Politics, 1(3), 349-385. Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., and Roser-Renouf, C. (2008). Global Warming’s “Six Ameri- cas”: An Audience Segmentation. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change. Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., and Roser-Renouf, C. (2009). Climate Change in the American Mind: Americans’ Climate Change Beliefs, Attitudes, Policy Preferences, and Actions. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change. Michaels, D. (2008). Doubt Is Their Product: How Industry’s Assault on Science Threatens Your Health. New York: Oxford University Press. Mileti, D. (1999). Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press. Moser, S.C., and Ekstrom, J.A. (2010). Barriers to climate change adaptation: A diagnostic framework. Submitted to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. National Research Council. (1985). Energy Efficiency in Buildings: Behavioral Issues. Com- mittee on Behavioral and Social Aspects of Energy Consumption and production. P.C. Stern, Ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (1996­­­­­­­). Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. P.C. Stern and H.V. Fineberg, Eds. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (2008). Research and Networks for Decision Support in the NOAA Sectoral Applications Research Program. Panel on Design Issues for the NOAA Sectoral Applications Research Program. H.M. Ingram and P.C. Stern, Eds. Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2009). America’s Energy Future. Committee on America’s Energy Future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2010a). Adapting to the Impacts of Climate Change. Panel on Adapting to the Impacts of Climate Change. Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate. Division on Earth and Life Studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2010b). Advancing the Science of Climate Change. Panel on Advancing the Science of Climate Change. Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate. Division on Earth and Life Studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2010c). Limiting the Magnitude of Future Climate Change. Panel on Limiting the Magnitude of Future Climate Change. Board on Atmospheric Sci- ences and Climate. Division on Earth and Life Studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

14 REFERENCES Nolan, J., Schultz, P.W., Cialdini, R.B., Griskevicius, V., and Goldstein, N. (2008). Norma- tive social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 913-923. Pacala, S., and Socolow, R.H. (2004). Stabilization wedges: Solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science, 0, 96­­­­­­­8-972. Palmgren, C.R., Morgan, M.G., Bruin, W.B.d., and Keith, D.W. (2004). Initial public percep- tions of deep geological and oceanic disposal of carbon dioxide. Environmental Science & Technology, , 6­­­­­­­,441-6­­­­­­­,450. Parry, M.L., Canziani, O.F., Palutikof, J.P., van der Linden, P.J., and Hanson, C.E. (Eds.). (2007). Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Pidgeon, N., Kasperson, R., and Slovic, P. (Eds.). (2003). The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Pidgeon, N.F., Poortinga, W., Rowe, G., Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J., and O’Riodan, T. (2005). Using surveys in public participation processes for risk decision making: The case of the 2003 British GM Nation? Public debate. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 2, 46­­­­­­­7-479. Pidgeon, N.F., Lorenzoni, I. and Poortinga, W. (2008). Climate change or nuclear power—no thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Global Environmental Change, 1, 6­­­­­­­9-85. Pidgeon, N.F., Henwood, K.L., Parkhill, K.A., Venables, D., and Simmons, P. (2008). Living with Nuclear Power in Britain: A Mixed-Methods Study. Summary Findings Report. Cardiff University and the University of East Anglia. Available: http://www.kent.ac.uk/ scarr/SCARRNuclearReportPidgeonetalFINAL3.pdf [accessed September 2010]. Pidgeon, N.F., Harthorn, B., Bryant, K., and Rogers-Hayden, T. (2009). Deliberating the risks of nanotechnology for energy and health applications in the U.S. and U.K. Nature Nanotechnology, 4, 95-98. Read, D., Bostrom, A., Morgan, M.G., Fischhoff, B., and Smuts, T. (1994). What do people know about global change? 2. Survey studies of educated laypepople. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 14, 971-982. Reynolds, T.W., Bostrom, A., Read, D., and Morgan, M.G. (2010). Now what do people know about global climate change? Survey studies of educated laypeople. Submitted to Risk Analysis: An International Journal. Sabatier, P.A., and Jenkins-Smith, H.C. (Eds.). (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Ad- vocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview. Schneider, M., Scholz, J., Lubell, M., Mindruta, D., and Edwardsen, M. (2003). Building consensual institutions: Networks and the National Estuary Program. American Journal of Political Science, 4, 143-158. Schultz, P.W., Nolan, J., Cialdini, R.B., Goldstein, N., and Griskevicius, V. (2007). The con- structive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 1, 429-434. Solomon, S., Plattner, G.K., Knutti, R., and Friedlingstein, P. (2009). Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences, 106(6­­­­­­­), 1704-1709. Spence, A. and Pidgeon, N.F. (2009). Psychology, climate change, and sustainable behavior. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 1(6­­­­­­­), 8-18. Spence, A., Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N.F., and Lorenzoni, I. (2010). Public perceptions of en- ). en- ergy choices: The influence of beliefs about climate change and the environment. Energy and Environment, 21(5), 385-407.

146 FACILITATING CLIMATE CHANGE RESPONSES Stern, P.C. (1986­­­­­­­). Blind spots in policy analysis: What economics doesn’t say about energy use. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, , 200-227. Stern, P.C., Gardner, G.T., Vandenbergh, M.P., Dietz, T., and Gilligan, J. (2010). Design prin- . prin- ciples for carbon emissions reduction programs. Environmental Science & Technology, 44, 4,847-4,848. Stokes, D.E. (1997). Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Swim, J., Clayton, S., Doherty, T., Gifford, R., Howard, G., Reser, J., Stern, P., and Weber, E. (2009). Psychology and Global Climate Change: Addressing a Multifaceted Phenomenon and Set of Challenges. A Report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on the Interface Between Psychology and Global Climate Change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Thaler, R.H., and Sunstein, C.R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, 2008). and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. U.S. Climate Change Science Program. (2008). Decision-Support Experiments and Evaluations Using Seasonal-to-Interannual Forecasts and Observational Data: A Focus on Water Re- sources. Final Report Synthesis and Assessment Product 5.3. N. Beller-Simms, H. Ingram, D. Feldman, N. Mantua, K.L. Jacobs, and A.M. Waple, Eds. Washington, DC: Author. U.S. Energy Information Agency. (2008). Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 200. Pub. No DOE/EIA-0573, Table 5. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy. U.S. Global Change Research Program. (2009a). Climate Literacy: The Essential Principles of Climate Sciences, A Guide for Individuals and Communities. Washington DC: Author. Available: http://www.climatescience.gov/Library/Literacy/ [accessed September 2010]. U.S. Global Change Research Program. (2009b). Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press. Vandenbergh, M.P., Stern, P.C., Gardner, G.T., Dietz, T., and Gilligan, J. (2010). Implement- Implement- ing the behavioral wedge: Designing and adopting effective carbon emissions reduction programs. Environmental Law Reporter, 40, 10,545-10,552. Wolf, J., Adger, W.N., Lorenzoni, I., Abrahamson, V. and Raine, R. (2010). Social capital, individual responses to heat waves and climate change adaptation: An empirical study of two UK cities. Global Environmental Change, 20(1), 44-52.

Next: Appendix A: December 2009 Workshop Agenda and List of Participants »
Facilitating Climate Change Responses: A Report of Two Workshops on Knowledge from the Social and Behavioral Sciences Get This Book
×
 Facilitating Climate Change Responses: A Report of Two Workshops on Knowledge from the Social and Behavioral Sciences
Buy Paperback | $51.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, understanding the need for policy makers at the national level to entrain the behavioral and social sciences in addressing the challenges of global climate change, called on the National Research Council to organize two workshops to showcase some of the decision-relevant contributions that these sciences have already made and can advance with future efforts. The workshops focused on two broad areas: (1) mitigation (behavioral elements of a strategy to reduce the net future human influence on climate) and (2) adaptation (behavioral and social determinants of societal capacity to minimize the damage from climate changes that are not avoided).

Facilitating Climate Change Responses documents the information presented in the workshop presentations and discussions. This material illustrates some of the ways the behavioral and social sciences can contribute to the new era of climate research.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!