Council on Competitiveness. 2007. Competitiveness Index: Where America Stands. Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.compete.org/images/uploads/File/PDF%20Files/Competitiveness_Index_Where_America_Stands_March_2007.pdf

Educational Testing Services. 2007. America’s Perfect Storm: Three Forces Changing Our Nation’s Future. Princeton, NJ. Available at: www.ets.org/stormreport

Ezell, S. and R. Atkinson. 2008. RAND’s Rose-Colored Glasses: How RAND’s Report on United States Competitiveness in Science and Technology Gets it Wrong. Washington, DC: Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. Available at: http://www.itif.org/files/2008RAND%20Rose-Colored%20Glasses.pdf

Hachigian, N. and M. Sutphen. 2008. The Next American Century: How the United States Can Thrive as Other Powers Rise. New York, NY: Simon and Shuster.

Kao, J. 2007. Innovation Nation: How America Is Losing Its Innovation Edge, Why It Matters, and What We Can Do to Get It Back. New York, NY: Free Press.

Innovation Council (Canada). 2008. State of the Nation: Canada’s Science, Technology and Innovation System. Ottawa, Ontario: Available at: http://www.stic-csti.ca/eic/site/stic-csti.nsf/eng/h_00011.html

Kauffman Foundation. 2007. On the Road to an Entrepreneurial Economy: A Research and Policy Guide. Kansas City, MO. Available at: http://www.kauffman.org/uploadedFiles/entrepreneurial_roadmap_2.pdf

Kuenzi, J. 2008. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: Background, Federal Policy, and Legislative Action. Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.sdsa.org/resources/publications/Congressional%20report.pdf

Lewis, J. 2005. Waiting for Sputnik: Basic Research and Strategic Competition. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies. Available at: http://csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/051028_waiting_for_sputnik.pdf

Lowell, B.L., H. Salzman, H. Bernstein, and E. Henderson. 2009. Steady as She Goes? Three Generations of Students through the Science and Engineering Pipeline. Paper presented at Annual Meetings of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Washington, DC. Available at: http://policy.rutgers.edu/faculty/salzman/SteadyAsSheGoes.pdf

McKinsey & Company. 2009. The Economic Impact of the Achievement Gap in America’s Schools. New York, NY. Available at: http://www.mckinsey.com/App_Media/Images/Page_Images/Offices/SocialSector/PDF/achievement_gap_report.pdf

Matthews, C. 2008. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Education: Status and Issues. Washington, DC. Available at: https://www.policyarchive.org/bitstream/handle/10207/19771/98-871_20080328.pdf?sequence=3

Millennium Project. 2008. Engineering for a Changing World: A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research, and Education. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan. Available at: http://milproj.dc.umich.edu/publications/EngFlex_report/download/EngFlex%20Report.pdf

National Academy of Engineering. 2008. The Offshoring of Engineering: Facts, Unknowns, and Potential Implications, Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12067

National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council. 2009. Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12635

National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 2008. Science and Technology for America’s Progress: Ensuring the Best Presidential Appointments in the New Administration, Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12481



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement