The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Missouri River Planning: Recognizing and Incorporating Sediment Management
each year. Given the relatively small volumes of sediment loadings from theCorps’ Missouri River ESH and SWH projects, it is not appropriate to relatechanges in the areal extent of the hypoxic zone to sediment and nutrient loadings from Missouri River ESH and SWH projects in any given year.
The sediment that was essential to preregulation river morphology and landforms, and to the turbidity that supported the ecosystem of native species, had certain characteristics. Development of narrative or numeric water quality criteria that are sensitive to these historic conditions will consider such factors in setting limits on sediment, as well as phosphorus, discharges to the mainstem river, and as a basis for regulating such discharges. Native species recovery objectives can be reconciled with the requirements of the Clean Water Act by basing waterbody use designation and associated criteria on aquatic life use that recognize the needs of native species.
The mainstem Missouri River historically carried a large sediment andnutrient load that was important to the evolution and survival of nativeflora and fauna. These preregulation characteristics should be consideredin the process of developing water quality standards for the Missouri River.
The federal agencies that are partners in the MRRP, and other majorMissouri River ecosystem program and initiatives, should collaborate withongoing Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) nutrient criteria guidancedevelopment process to achieve agreement among themselves and with thestates on designated uses for the river, by river segment, to reflect requirements for native species. As a result of this effort, EPA should support statesthat revise their existing narrative criteria for the mainstem Missouri Riverin order to reflect requirements for native species, even if such separate narrative sediment and nutrient criteria are later replaced by numeric criteria.As appropriate, downstream considerations (such as Gulf hypoxia) may beconsidered in the setting of phosphorus criteria.
There has been a good deal of discussion regarding Corps of Engineers habitat restoration actions along the Missouri River that introduce sediment to the main channel. Specifically, some parties have asserted that private entities are held to a higher standard of permitting and monitoring than a federal agency such as the Corps of Engineers. In order to obtain better, more systematic information on sediment dynamics along the river and specific activities that introduce sediment, it is important that all major activities that discharge sediment—whether private sector or governmental—be similarly monitored and evaluated.
All actions by the Corps of Engineers that discharge sediment to theMissouri River, either during project construction or through erosion following construction, should be subjected to monitoring requirements forsediment physical and chemical characteristics. This monitoring should beconducted to ensure that sediment or other pollutants discharged into theriver comply with applicable water quality criteria.