Cover Image

PAPERBACK
$34.75



View/Hide Left Panel

[87] E.S. Rubin, et al., The Effect of Government Actions on Environmental Technology Innovation: Applications to the Integrated Assessment of Carbon Sequestration Technologies, Final Report of Award No. DE-FG02-00ER63037 from Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA to Office of Biological and Environmental Research, U.S. Department of Energy, Germantown, MD, 2004.

[88] J.D. Mobley, ed. Status of EPA’s NOx flue gas treatment program. Proceedings: Second NOx Control Technology Symposium. Denver, Colorado, EPRI, ed. J.E. Cichanowicz. 1978.

[89] J.D. Maxwell, T.A. Burnett and H.L. Faucett, Preliminary Economic Analysis of NOx Flue Gas Treatment Processes. EPA/600/7-80/021. 1980, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, D.C.

[90] J.D. Maxwell and L.R. Humphries, Evaluation of the Advanced Low-NOx Burner, Exxon and Hitachi Zosen DeNOx Processes. Report # EPA-600/7-81-120. 1981, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development.

[91] IPCC, IPCC Special Report on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage, O.D. B. Metz, et.al, Editor. 2005, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Geneva, Switzerland.

[92] K. Riahi, et al., Technological Learning for Carbon Capture and Sequestration Technologies. Energy Economics, 26 (2004) 539-564.

[93] K. Riahi, et al. Towards Fossil-Based Electricity Systems with Integrated CO2 Capture: Implications of an Illustrative Long-Term Technology Policy. in Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Volume I: Peer-Reviewed Papers and Overviews, 2005: Elsevier.

[94] A.B. Rao and E.S. Rubin, A Technical, Economic and Environmental Assessment of Amine-Based CO2 Capture Technology for Power Plant Greenhouse Gas Control. Environmental Science and Technology, 36 (2002) 4467-4475.

[95] A.W. Pappano, J.T. Sears and W.R. Parr, Availability and Economics of CO2 for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Appalachia. 1976, Department of Chemical Engineering, West Virginia University: Morgantown, West Virginia.

[96] H.R. Anada, et al., Feasibility and Economics of By-Product CO2 Supply for Enhanced Oil Recovery. Final Report, DOE/MC/08333-3, Vol. 1: Technical Report. 1982, U.S. DOE: Springfield, Virginia.

[97] D. Chapel, J. Ernst and C. Mariz. Recovery of CO2 from Flue Gases: Commercial Trends. in Canadian Society of Chemical Engineers Annual Meeting. 1999. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

[98] M.R. DeLallo, et al. Evaluation of innovative fossil cycles incorporating CO2 removal. in 2000 Gasification Technologies Conference. 2000. San Francisco, California.

[99] D.R. Simbeck and M. McDonald. Existing Coal Power Plant Retrofit CO2 Control Options Analysis. in Fifth Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-5). 2000. Cairns, Australia.

[100] A.B. Rao, A Technical, Environmental and Economic Assessment of Amine-Based Carbon Capture Technologies for Greenhouse Gas Control, in Department of Engineering and Public Policy. 2003, Carnegie Mellon University: Pittsburgh, PA.

[101] A.B. Rao, et al., Evaluation of potential cost reductions from improved amine-based CO2 capture systems. Energy Policy, 34 (2006) 3765-3772.

[102] L. Argote, Organizational Learning Curves: Persistence, Transfer and Turnover. International Journal of Technology Management. Special Publication on Learning and Unlearning, 11 (1996) 759-69.

[103] L. Argote, Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts, 1999.

[104] R. Sturm, Nuclear-power in eastern Europe—learning or forgetting curves. Energy Economics, 15 (1993) 183-189.

[105] R. Cantor and J. Hewlett, The economics of nuclear-power. Further evidence on learning, economics of scale and regulatory effects. Resources and Energy, 10 (1988) 315-335.

[106] J. Hewlett, Economic and regulatory factors affecting the maintenance of nuclear power plants. Energy Journal, 17 (1996) 1-31.

[107] U.S. NRC, Information Digest 2003 Edition (NUREG-1350, Vol. 15). 2003, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Washington, D.C.

[108] J.P. Weyant and T. Olavson, Issues in modeling induced technological change in energy, environmental and climate policy. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 4 (1999) 67-85.

[109] A. Grubler and A. Gritsevskii. A model of endogenous technological change through uncertain returns on learning (R&D and investments). in Conf. Induc. Technol. Change Environ. 1997. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute of Applied System Analysis.

[110] S. Messner, A. Golodnikov and A. Gritsevskii, A stochastic version of the dynamic linear programming model MESSAGE III. Energy, 21 (1996) 775-784.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement