National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$69.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D (2011)
Food and Nutrition Board (FNB)

Citation Manager

. "4 Review of Potential Indicators of Adequacy and Selection of Indicators: Calcium and Vitamin D." Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
128
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


DRI Dietary Reference Intakes Calcium Vitamin D

BOX 4-1

AHRQ Critical Appraisal and Grading of Evidence

Grading system used by AHRQ-Ottawa:


Basic Jadad score is assessed based on the answer to five questions listed below. Questions that are answered with a “yes” gain 1 point; questions answered with a “no” receive 0 points; the maximum score is 5. A score of 0 to 2 points is considered “low” quality, and a score of 3 to 5 points is considered “high” quality.

  1. Was the study described as random?

  2. Was the randomization scheme described and appropriate?

  3. Was the study described as double-blind?

  4. Was the method of double-blinding appropriate? (Were both the patient and the assessor appropriately blinded?)

  5. Was there a description of dropouts and withdrawals?

Grading system used by AHRQ-Tufts (based on criteria below):


A = highest quality

Studies have the least bias and results are considered valid. These studies adhere mostly to the commonly held concepts of high quality, including the following: a formal study design; clear description of the population, setting, interventions, and comparison groups; appropriate measurement of outcomes; appropriate statistical and analytical methods and reporting; no reporting errors; less than 20 percent dropout; clear reporting of dropouts; and no obvious bias. Studies must provide valid estimation of nutrient exposure from dietary assessments and/or biomarkers with reasonable ranges of measurement errors and justifications for approaches to control for confounding in their design and analyses.

B = medium quality

Studies are susceptible to some bias, but not sufficient to invalidate the results. They do not meet all the criteria in category “A”; they have some deficiencies, but none likely to cause major bias. The study may be missing information, making it difficult to assess limitations and potential problems.

C = low quality

Studies have significant bias that may invalidate the results. These studies have serious errors in design, analysis, or reporting; there are large amounts of missing information or discrepancies in reporting.

SOURCES: Jadad et al., 1996; Cranney et al., 2007; Chung et al., 2009.

Page
128
Front Matter (R1-R16)
Summary (1-14)
1 Introduction (15-34)
2 Overview of Calcium (35-74)
3 Overview of Vitamin D (75-124)
4 Review of Potential Indicators of Adequacy and Selection of Indicators: Calcium and Vitamin D (125-344)
5 Dietary Reference Intakes for Adequacy: Calcium and Vitamin D (345-402)
6 Tolerable Upper Intake Levels: Calcium and Vitamin D (403-456)
7 Dietary Intake Assessment (457-478)
8 Implications and Special Concerns (479-512)
9 Information Gaps and Research Needs (513-522)
Appendix A: Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Glossary (523-536)
Appendix B: Issues and Interests Identified by Study Sponsors (537-538)
Appendix C: Methods and Results from the AHRQ-Ottawa Evidence-Based Report on Effectiveness and Safety of Vitamin D in Relation to Bone Health (539-724)
Appendix D: Methods and Results from the AHRQ-Tufts Evidence-Based Report on Vitamin D and Calcium (725-1012)
Appendix E: Literature Search Strategy (1013-1018)
Appendix F: Evidence Maps (1019-1024)
Appendix G: Cases Studies of Vitamin D Toxicity (1025-1034)
Appendix H: Estimated Intakes of Calcium and Vitamin D from National Surveys (1035-1044)
Appendix I: Proportion of the Population Above and Below 40 nmol/L Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations and Cumulative Distribution of Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations: United States and Canada (1045-1058)
Appendix J: Workshop Agenda and Open Session Agendas (1059-1064)
Appendix K: Biographical Sketches of Committee Members (1065-1074)
Index (1075-1102)
Summary Tables: Dietary Reference Intakes (1103-1116)