National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$59.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust (2011)
Board on Health Care Services (HCS)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix D: Systems for Rating the Strength of Evidence and Clinical Recommendations." Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
232
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust

TABLE D-1 Selected Approaches to Rating Strength of Evidence and Clinical Recommendations

System

Focus/Audience

Systems for Rating Evidence Quality

International Approaches

Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group (2009)

Focus: Diagnosis and therapy

Grades of evidence Randomized trial: High Observational study: Low Any other evidence: Very low

Audience: Guideline developers

Decrease grade if limitations in study quality, important inconsistency of results, uncertainty about the directness of the evidence, imprecise or sparse data, and high risk of reporting bias.

A voluntary, international, collaboration

Increase grade if a very strong association, evidence of a dose–response gradient, presence of all plausible residual confounding would have reduced the observed effect.

Page
232