National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$59.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust (2011)
Board on Health Care Services (HCS)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix D: Systems for Rating the Strength of Evidence and Clinical Recommendations." Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
254
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust

REFERENCES

AAN (American Academy of Neurology). 2004. Clinical practice guidelines process manual. http://www.aan.com/globals/axon/assets/3749.pdf (accessed July 28, 2009).

ACCF/AHA (American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association). 2009. Methodology manual for ACCF/AHA guideline writing committees. http://www.americanheart.org/downloadable/heart/12378388766452009MethodologyManualACCF_AHAGuidelineWritingCommittees.pdf (accessed July 29, 2009).

ACCP (American College of Chest Physicians). 2009. The ACCP grading system for guideline recommendations. http://www.chestnet.org/education/hsp/gradingSystem.php (accessed July 28, 2009).

CEBM (Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine). 2009. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine—Levels of Evidence (March 2009). http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025 (accessed July 28, 2009).

Ebell, M. H., J. Siwek, B. D. Weiss, S. H. Woolf, J. Susman, B. Ewigman, and M. Bowman. 2004. Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): A patient-centered approach to grading evidence in medical literature. American Family Physician 69(3):548–556.

GRADE Working Group (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Working Group). 2009. Grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/intro.htm (accessed July 20, 2009).

ICSI (Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement). 2003. Evidence grading system. http://www.icsi.org/evidence_grading_system_6/evidence_grading_system__pdf_.html (accessed September 8, 2009).

Kish, M. A. 2001. Guide to development of practice guidelines. Clinical Infectious Diseases 32(6):851–854.

NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network). 2008. About the NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/about.asp (accessed September 8, 2009).

NZGG (New Zealand Guidelines Group). 2007. Handbook for the preparation of explicit evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. http://www.nzgg.org.nz/download/files/nzgg_guideline_handbook.pdf (accessed September 4, 2009).

SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network). 2009. SIGN 50: A guideline developer’s handbook http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/50/index.html (accessed July 20, 2009).

Steering Committee on Quality Improvement Management. 2004. Classifying recommendations for clinical practice guidelines. Pediatrics 114(3):874–877.

Tobe, S. W., R. M. Touyz, and N. R. C. Campbell. 2007. The Canadian Hypertension Education Program—a unique Canadian knowledge translation program. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 23(7):551–555.

USPSTF (U.S. Preventive Services Task Force). 2008. Grade definitions. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/grades.htm (accessed July 28, 2009).

Page
254