National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$61.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2011)
Board on Health Care Services (HCS)

Citation Manager

. "Summary." Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
15
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews

5.1.7

Include a results section; organize the presentation of results around key questions; describe the following (repeat for each key question):

  • Study selection process*

  • List of excluded studies and reasons for their exclusion*

  • Appraisal of individual studies’ quality*

  • Qualitative synthesis

  • Meta-analysis of results, if performed (explain rationale for doing one)*

  • Additional analyses, if done, indicating which were prespecified*

  • Tables and figures

5.1.8

Include a discussion section. Include the following:

  • Summary of the evidence*

  • Strengths and limitations of the systematic review*

  • Conclusions for each key question*

  • Gaps in evidence

  • Future research needs

5.1.9

Include a section describing funding sources* and COI

Standard 5.2 Peer review the draft report

Required elements:

5.2.1

Use a third party to manage the peer review process

5.2.2

Provide a public comment period for the report and publicly report on disposition of comments

Standard 5.3 Publish the final report in a manner that ensures free public access

  

* Indicates items from the PRISMA checklist. (The committee endorses all of the PRISMA checklist items.)

  • Supporting research to improve the communication and use of SRs of CER in clinical decision making;

  • Developing effective coordination and collaboration between U.S. and international partners;

  • Developing a process to ensure that standards for SRs of CER are regularly updated to reflect current best practice; and

  • Using SRs to inform priorities and methods for primary CER.

This recommendation conveys the committee’s view of how best to implement its recommendations to improve the science and sup-

Page
15