National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$61.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2011)
Board on Health Care Services (HCS)

Citation Manager

. "5 Standards for Reporting Systematic Reviews." Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
197
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews

BOX 5-1

Recommended Standards for Reporting Systematic Reviews

Standard 5.1 Prepare the final report using a structured format

Required elements:

5.1.1

Include a report title*

5.1.2

Include an abstract*

5.1.3

Include an executive summary

5.1.4

Include a summary written for the lay public

5.1.5

Include an introduction (rationale and objectives)*

5.1.6

Include a methods section. Describe the following:

  • Research protocol*

  • Eligibility criteria (criteria for including and excluding studies in the sysematic review)*

  • Analytic framework and key questions

  • Databases and other information sources used to identify relevant studies*

  • Search strategy*

  • Study selection process*

  • Data extraction process*

  • Methods for handling missing information*

  • Information to be extracted from included studies*

  • Methods to appraise the quality of individual studies*

  • Summary measures of effect size (e.g., risk ratio, difference in means)*

  • Rationale for pooling (or not pooling) results of included studies

  • Methods of synthesizing the evidence (qualitative and meta-analysis*)

  • Additional analyses, if done, indicating which were prespecified*

5.1.7

Include a results section. Organize the presentation of results around key questions. Describe the following (repeat for each key question):

  • Study selection process*

  • List of excluded studies and reasons for their exclusion*

  • Appraisal of individual studies’ quality*

  • Qualitative synthesis

  • Meta-analysis of results, if performed (explain rationale for doing one)*

  • Additional analyses, if done, indicating which were prespecified*

  • Tables and figures

5.1.8

Include a discussion section. Include the following:

  • Summary of the evidence*

Page
197