von Elm, E., D. G. Altman, M. Egger, S. J. Pocock, P. C. Gotzsche, J. P. Vandenbroucke, and the Strobe Initiative. 2007. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of Internal Medicine 147(8):573–577.

Weller, A. C. 2002. Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses. Medford, NJ: American Society for Information Science and Technology. http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=lH3DVnkbTFsC&oi=fnd&pg=PR12&dq=ICMJE+PEER+REVIEW&ots=rpXA8rZOna&sig=nCltaFOsxGxyrVSoGCeWWhRNLIE#v=onepage&q=ICMJE%20PEER%20REVIEW&f=false (accessed July 12, 2010).

Whitlock, E. P., S. A. Lopez, S. Chang, M. Helfand, M. Eder, and N. Floyd. 2010. AHRQ Series Paper 3: Identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63(5):491–501.

Wills, C. E., and M. Holmes-Rovner. 2003. Patient comprehension of information for shared treatment decision making: State of the art and future directions. Patient Education and Counseling 50(3):285–290.

Yank, V., D. Rennie, and L. A. Bero. 2007. Financial ties and concordance between results and conclusions in meta-analyses: Retrospective cohort study. BMJ 335(7631):1202–1205.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement