White, C. M., S. Ip, M. McPheeters, T. S. Carey, R. Chou, K. N. Lohr, K. Robinson, K. McDonald, and E. Whitlock. 2009. Using existing systematic reviews to replace de novo processes in CERs. In Methods guide for comparative effectiveness reviews, edited by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. http://www.effective-healthcare.ahrq.gov/index.cfm/search-for-guides-reviews-and-reports/?pageaction=displayProduct&productID=329 (accessed January 19, 2011).
Whitlock, E. P., S. A. Lopez, S. Chang, M. Helfand, M. Eder, and N. Floyd. 2010. AHRQ series paper 3: Identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63(5):491–501.
The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Appendix G: Expert Guidance for Chapter 5: Standards for Reporting Systemic Reviews ."
Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews . Washington, DC: The National Academies Press,
Please select a format:
As of 2013, the National Science Education Standards have been replaced by the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS), available as a print book, free PDF download, and online with our OpenBook platform.
The NGSS offer a detailed description of the key scientific ideas and practices that all students should learn by the time they graduate from high school. The standards are based largely on the 2011 National Research Council report A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas.