|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy. Simonson, I., and B. M. Staw. 1992. Deescalation strategies: A comparison of techniques for reducing commitment to losing courses of action. Journal of Applied Psychology 77(4):419–426. Suskind, R. 2006. The one-percent doctrine: Deep inside America’s pursuit of its enemies since 9/11. New York: Simon and Schuster. Taleb, N. N. 2007. The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. New York: Random House. Tetlock, P. E. 1985. Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. In B. Staw and L. Cummings, eds., Research in organizational behavior, vol. 7 (pp. 297–332). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Reprinted in L. Cummings and B. Staw, eds., Research in organizational behavior: Judgment processes. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Tetlock, P. E. 1992. The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. In M. Zanna, ed., Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 25 (pp. 331-376). New York: Academic Press. Tetlock, P. E. 2000. Cognitive biases and organizational correctives: Do both disease and cure depend on the ideological beholder? Administrative Science Quarterly 45:293–326. Tetlock, P. E. 2005. Expert political judgment: How good is it? How can we know? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Tetlock, P. E., and R. Boettger. 1989. Accountability: A social magnifier of the dilution effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57(3):388–398. Tetlock, P. E., and R. Boettger. 1994. Accountability amplifies the status quo effect when change creates victims. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 7:1–23. Tetlock, P. E., and L. I. Kim. 1987. Accountability and judgment processes in a personality prediction task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52(4):700–709. Tetlock, P. E., and G. Mitchell. 2009. Implicit bias and accountability systems: What must organizations do to prevent discrimination? In B. M. Staw and A. Brief, eds., Research in organizational behavior, vol. 29 (pp. 3–38). New York: Elsevier. Tetlock, P. E., and F. Vieider, 2011. Accountability, agency, and ideology: Exploring managerial preferences for process versus outcome accountability. Unpublished manuscript, Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania. Wilson, J. Q. 1989. Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why. New York: Basic Books.
|
|
|||||||||||||||
