Simonson, I., and B. M. Staw. 1992. Deescalation strategies: A comparison of techniques for reducing commitment to losing courses of action. Journal of Applied Psychology 77(4):419–426.
Suskind, R. 2006. The one-percent doctrine: Deep inside America’s pursuit of its enemies since 9/11. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Taleb, N. N. 2007. The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. New York: Random House.
Tetlock, P. E. 1985. Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. In B. Staw and L. Cummings, eds., Research in organizational behavior, vol. 7 (pp. 297–332). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Reprinted in L. Cummings and B. Staw, eds., Research in organizational behavior: Judgment processes. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Tetlock, P. E. 1992. The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. In M. Zanna, ed., Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 25 (pp. 331-376). New York: Academic Press.
Tetlock, P. E. 2000. Cognitive biases and organizational correctives: Do both disease and cure depend on the ideological beholder? Administrative Science Quarterly 45:293–326.
Tetlock, P. E. 2005. Expert political judgment: How good is it? How can we know? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Tetlock, P. E., and R. Boettger. 1989. Accountability: A social magnifier of the dilution effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57(3):388–398.
Tetlock, P. E., and R. Boettger. 1994. Accountability amplifies the status quo effect when change creates victims. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 7:1–23.
Tetlock, P. E., and L. I. Kim. 1987. Accountability and judgment processes in a personality prediction task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52(4):700–709.
Tetlock, P. E., and G. Mitchell. 2009. Implicit bias and accountability systems: What must organizations do to prevent discrimination? In B. M. Staw and A. Brief, eds., Research in organizational behavior, vol. 29 (pp. 3–38). New York: Elsevier.
Tetlock, P. E., and F. Vieider, 2011. Accountability, agency, and ideology: Exploring managerial preferences for process versus outcome accountability. Unpublished manuscript, Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania.
Wilson, J. Q. 1989. Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why. New York: Basic Books.