National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$39.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Explaining Divergent Levels of Longevity in High-Income Countries (2011)
Committee on Population (CPOP)

Citation Manager

. "3 The Role of Obesity." Explaining Divergent Levels of Longevity in High-Income Countries. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
44
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Explaining Divergent Levels of Longevity in High-Income Countries

It then becomes possible to look for correlations between those trends and the varying trends in life expectancy.

Body Mass Index and Weight Categories

The standard way of assessing a person’s weight relative to height is with body mass index (BMI), defined as a person’s weight in kilograms divided by the square of the person’s height measured in meters. Thus, a person who weighs 75 kilograms (165 pounds) and is 1.75 meters high (5 feet, 9 inches) has a BMI of 24.5.

According to the World Health Organization (2006), a person is of normal weight if he or she has a BMI between 18.50 and 24.99. A person with a BMI of 25 or more is considered overweight, while anyone with a BMI of 30 or more is considered obese. Obesity is further subdivided into Class 1 (30–34.99), Class 2 (35–39.99), and Class 3 (40 and above). For instance, a person who is 1.6 meters (5 feet, 3 inches) tall and weighs 77 kilograms (169 pounds) has a BMI of slightly more than 30, or is borderline obese.

BMI is the most widely used measure for determining obesity mainly because it is convenient. It is easy and straightforward to obtain a person’s height and weight and then apply the BMI formula. Other measures of obesity, such as percentage of body fat, are generally much more difficult to determine accurately. However, errors are not uncommon in self-reports of height and weight (Ezzati et al., 2006). Balancing out its convenience, moreover, is the fact that BMI is no more than a rough measure of how fat a person is. People who are particularly muscular will have a high BMI, for instance, even if they have very low body fat. Furthermore, there is evidence that not all fat is created equal and that certain fat distributions—such as intra-abdominal fat around the waist area—are unhealthier than others (Bergman et al., 2006; Snijder et al., 2006). Thus, many studies use other measures, such as waist-to-hip ratio or body fat percentage, to gauge health risks. Still, BMI has the advantage that, because it is so convenient, far more data—particularly historical and international data—exist for it than for any of the other measures. For that reason, this chapter focuses on BMI data while noting the limitations of relying strictly on these data and describing other relevant data where they exist.

Obesity Trends in the United States and Other Countries

One of the most striking health-related trends in the United States over the past 50 years has been the rise of obesity. As can be seen in Figure 3-1, in 1960−1962 only 10.7 percent of adult males and 15.8 percent of adult females in the country were obese. By 2007−2008, those numbers had risen to 32.2 and 35.5 percent, respectively. For both sexes, the growth in obesity

Page
44