References and Bibliography

Abedi, J. (Ed.). 2007. English Language Proficiency Assessment in the Nation: Current Status and Future Practice. Davis: University of California.

Abedi, J. 2008. Classification system for English language learners: Issues and recommendations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(3), 17-31.

Abedi, J., and Dietel, R. 2004. Challenges in the No Child Left Behind Act for English Language Learners. CRESST Policy Brief. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, University of California.

American Educational Research Association, the American Psychological Association, and the National Council on Measurement in Education. 1999. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

American Institutes for Research. 2005. ELDA English Language Proficiency Standards and Test and Item Specifications for Grades 3–12. Available: http://arkansased.org/educators/pdf/lep/elda_standards_specs_103105.pdf [January 2011].

Angoff, W.H. 1971. Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In R.L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational Measurement (2nd ed., pp. 508-600). Washington DC: American Council on Education.

Angoff, W.H. 1984. Scales, Norms, and Equivalent Scores. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Anstrom, K., DiCerbo, P., Ferraro, M., and Stoops Verplaetse, L. 2009, June 19. Webinar: Academic Language in Secondary-Level Standards and Classrooms [National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition]. Available: http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/webinars/event/11/ [April 2011].

Arizona Department of Education. 2007. Arizona Technical Manual. Office of English Language Acquisition Services. Available: http://www.ade.az.gov/oelas/AZELLA/AZELLAAZ-1TechnicalManual.pdf [October 2009].

Arkansas Department of Education. n.d. Guide to Understanding Scores: Limited English Proficient, Arkansas. Available: http://www.arkansased.org/lep/pdf/elda_scores_guide_051509.pdf [December 2010].

Bailey, A.L., and Heritage, H.M. 2008. Formative Assessment for Literacy, Grades K-6: Building Reading and Academic Language Skills Across the Curriculum. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Bailey, A.I., and Kelly, K.R. 2010, July. The Use and Validity of Home Language Surveys in State English Proficiency Assessment Systems: A Review and Issues Perspective. White paper prepared for the U.S. Department of Education for the Evaluating the Validity of English Language Proficiency Assessments project.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 171
References and Bibliography Abedi, J. (Ed.). 2007. English Language Proficiency Assessment in the Nation: Current Status and Future Practice. Davis: University of California. Abedi, J. 2008. Classification system for English language learners: Issues and recommendations. Educa- tional Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(3), 17-31. Abedi, J., and Dietel, R. 2004. Challenges in the No Child Left Behind Act for English Language Learners. CRESST Policy Brief. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, University of California. American Educational Research Association, the American Psychological Association, and the National Council on Measurement in Education. 1999. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. American Institutes for Research. 2005. ELDA English Language Proficiency Standards and Test and Item Specifications for Grades 3–12. Available: http://arkansased.org/educators/pdf/lep/elda_standards_ specs_103105.pdf [January 2011]. Angoff, W.H. 1971. Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In R.L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational Measure- ment (2nd ed., pp. 508-600). Washington DC: American Council on Education. Angoff, W.H. 1984. Scales, Norms, and Equivalent Scores. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Anstrom, K., DiCerbo, P., Ferraro, M., and Stoops Verplaetse, L. 2009, June 19. Webinar: Academic Lan- guage in Secondary-Level Standards and Classrooms [National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition]. Available: http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/webinars/event/11/ [April 2011]. Arizona Department of Education. 2007. Arizona Technical Manual. Office of English Language Acquisi- tion Services. Available: http://www.ade.az.gov/oelas/AZELLA/AZELLAAZ-1TechnicalManual.pdf [October 2009]. Arkansas Department of Education. n.d. Guide to Understanding Scores: Limited English Proficient, Arkan- sas. Available: http://www.arkansased.org/lep/pdf/elda_scores_guide_051509.pdf [December 2010]. Bailey, A.L., and Heritage, H.M. 2008. Formative Assessment for Literacy, Grades K-6: Building Reading and Academic Language Skills Across the Curriculum. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Bailey, A.I., and Kelly, K.R. 2010, July. The Use and Validity of Home Language Surveys in State English Proficiency Assessment Systems: A Review and Issues Perspective. White paper prepared for the U.S. Department of Education for the Evaluating the Validity of English Language Proficiency Assess - ments project. 171

OCR for page 171
172 ALLOCATING FEDERAL FUNDS Bauman, J., Boals, T., Cranley, E., Gottlieb, M., and Kenyon, D. 2007. Assessing Comprehension and Communication in English State to State for English Language Learners (ACCESS for ELLs ®). In J. Abedi (Ed.), English Language Proficiency Assessment in the Nation: Current Status and Future Practice (pp. 81-91). Davis: University of California. California Department of Education. 2008a. Data Elements, Templates, and Data Files for the School Ac- countability Report Card (SARC) for 2008-2009. Available: http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/sarc0809. asp [January 2011]. California Department of Education. 2008b. CELDT Released Test Questions. Available: http://www.cde. ca.gov/ta/tg/el/documents/celdtrtqs0408.pdf [December 2010]. California Department of Education. 2008c. Technical Report for the California Language Development Test, 2007-2008 Edition, Form G. California Language Development Test. Available: http://www.cde. ca.gov/ta/tg/el/documents/techrpt0708.pdf [December 2010]. California Department of Education. 2009a. Communicating 2009-2010 Individual Results with Parents and Guardians. Available: http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/el/documents/celdt09astpkt2rev.pdf [De- cember 2010]. California Department of Education. 2009b. Questions and Answers about the California English Language Development Test. Available: http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/el/documents/celdt09qa.pdf [December 2010]. California Department of Education. 2009c. Technical Report for the California Language Development Test, 2008-2009 Edition. Available: http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/el/documents/techrpt0809.pdf [December 2010]. California Department of Education. 2010a. Student National Origin Report Submission in 2009-2010. Available: http://www.education.ca.gov/sp/el/t3/snorpinltr09.asp?print=yes [December 2010]. California Department of Education. 2010b. Test Results Interpretation Guide for Kindergarten and Grade One, 2010-2011 Edition. Available: http://www.celdt.org/documents/2010-11/CELDT_ TRIG_2010-11_English_K-1.pdf [December 2010]. Carlton, S. 2009. Fairness Review of Assessments. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Cizek, G.J. (Ed). 2001. Setting Performance Standards: Concepts, Methods, and Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Colorado Department of Education. 2007a. Language, Culture, and Equity. Available: http://www. cde.state.co.us/cde_english/download/CELA/CELA_PostTest%20Training%20(2).pdf [December 2010]. Colorado Department of Education. 2007b. Language, Culture, and Equity. CELA Program Adminis- tration. Available: http://www.cde.state.co.us/cde_english/download/CELA/Brochures/CELAbro- chure07.pdf [December 2010]. Cook, H.G., Hicks, E., Lee, S., and Freshwater, R. 2009, July. Methods for Establishing English Language Proficiency Using State Content and Language Proficiency Assessments. Unpublished white paper, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison. CTB/McGraw-Hill. 2006. Technical Manual for LAS Links. Monterey, CA: Author. CTB/McGraw-Hill. 2009a. LAS Links Details. Available: http://www2.ctb.com/sites/laslinks/details/ details.shtml [December 2010]. CTB/McGraw-Hill. 2009b. LAS Links Form B. Missouri Index of PDFs. Available: http://www.mo-ell. org/pdfs/macii/LASLinksTraining.pdf. CTB/McGraw-Hill. 2009c. LAS Links K-12 Assessments. Available: http://www.ctb.com/products/ product_detail.jsp?FOLDER%3C%3Efolder_id=1408474395292398&bmUID=1259010098152. CTB/McGraw-Hill. 2009d. LAS Links Placement Test. Available: http://www.ctb.com/products/ product_summary.jsp?FOLDER%3C%3Efolderid=1408474395292913&bmUID=1259010100589. De Ávila, E. 1997. Setting Expected Gains for Non- and Limited-English Proficient Students. NCELA Resource Collection Series No. 8. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. Del Vecchio, A.N., and Guerrero, M. 1995. Handbook of English Language Proficiency Tests. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.

OCR for page 171
173 REFERENCES EdSource. 2008. English Learners in California: What the Numbers Say. Available: http://www.edsource. org/pub_ELvitalstats3-08.html [December 2010]. Educational Testing Service. 2005. CELLA Technical Summary Report. Available: http://www.accountabil- ityworks.org/photos/CELLA_Technical_Summary_Report.pdf [December 2010]. Ercikan, K., Schwarz, R.D., Julian, M.W., Burkett, G., Weber, M.M., and Link, V. 1998. Calibration and scoring of tests with multiple-choice and constructed-response item types. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35(2), 137-154. Federal Register. 2008. Title III of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Doc E8-24702, vol. 73, no. 202, 61828-61844. Available: http:// www.federalregister.gov/articles/2008/10/17/E8-24702/title-iii-of-the-elementary-and-secondary- education-act-of-1965-esea-as-amended-by-the-no-child-left [April 2011]. Finkleman, M. n.d. Decision Accuracy and Consistency. Available: http://www.measuredprogress.org/ resources/psychometrics/learningtools/intermediate/materials/DecisionAccuracy.pdf. Fitzpatrick, A.R., Julian, M.W., Hauck, M.C., and Dawber, T.E. 2006. The Dimensionality of Two NCLB Tests Designed to Assess Students’ English Language Proficiency. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Florida Department of Education. n.d. CELLA Information. Florida-Comprehensive English Language Learning Assessment (CELLA). Available: http://www.fldoe.org/aala/pdf/2008CELLAInfoFlyerENG. pdf [December 2010]. Florida Department of Education. 2006. CELLA Fact Sheet. Florida-Comprehensive English Language Learning Assessment (CELLA). Available: http://www.fldoe.org/aala/pdf/cellainfosheet.pdf [Decem - ber 2010]. Florida Department of Education. 2008. CELLA Score Reports. Florida-Comprehensive English Lan- guage Learning Assessment (CELLA). Available: http://www.fldoe.org/aala/pdf/2008%20FL%20 CELLA%20Score%20Report%20Interpretation_061108FINAL. Florida Department of Education. 2009. CELLA Interpretive Guide-English. Florida-Comprehensive English Language Learning Assessment (CELLA). Available: http://www.fldoe.org/aala/pdf/CELLA- Interpretive-Guide.pdf [December 2010]. Francis, D.J., and Rivera, M.O. 2007. Principles underlying English language proficiency tests and academic accountability for ELLs. In J. Abedi (Ed.), English Language Proficiency Assessment in the Nation: Current Status and Future Practice (pp. 13-31). Davis: University of California. Garrett, D., Williams, A., and Petroni, R. 2004. Monitoring, Experience and Performance of CATI In- terviewers in the American Community Survey. In Joint Statistical Meeting Proceedings. Available: http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/proceedings/y2004/files/Jsm2004-000521.pdf [December 2010]. Garson, D. 2009. Reliability Analysis. North Carolina State University. Available: http://faculty.chass.ncsu. edu/garson/PA765/reliab.htm [December 2010]. Haertel, E.H., and Linn, R.L. 1996. Comparability. In G.W. Phillips (Ed.), Technical Issues in Large- Scale Performance Assessment (pp. 59-78). Report No. NCES 96-802. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U. S. Department of Education. Hakuta, K., Butler, Y., and Witt, D. 2000. How Long Does It Take English Learners to Attain Profi- ciency? Linguistic Minority Research Institute Policy Report 2000-1. Santa Barbara: University of California. Harcourt. 2007. AZELLA Technical Manual, Form AZ-1. Available: http://www.ade.az.gov/oelas/ AZELLA/AZELLAAZ-1TechnicalManual.pdf [April 2011]. Harris, P., Bhaskar, R., Shook-Finucane, C., and Ericson, L. 2007. Evaluation Report Covering Place of Birth, U.S. Citizenship Status, and Year of Arrival: Final Report. Available: http://www.census.gov/ acs/www/AdvMeth/content_test/P1_Citizenship.pdf [December 2010]. Holland, P.W., and Dorans, N.J. 2006. Linking and equating. In R.L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational Mea- surement (4th ed., pp. 187-220). Westport, CT: American Council on Education/Praeger. Illinois State Board of Education. 2009. Immigrant Education Program. Available: http://www.isbe.net/ bilingual/pdfs/immigrant_program_app.pdf [December 2010].

OCR for page 171
174 ALLOCATING FEDERAL FUNDS Impara, J.C., and Plake, B.S. 1997. Standard setting: An alternative approach. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 355-368. Jaeger, R.M. 1989. Certification of student competence. In R.L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed., pp. 485-511).Washington, DC: American Council on Education. Johnson, E.G., and Owen, E. 1998. Types of linkage. Chapter 3 in Linking the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) and the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS): A Technical Report. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Available: http://nces. ed.gov/pubs98/98499.pdf [December 2010]. Kane, M.T. 1995. So much remains the same: Conception and status of validation in setting standards. In G.J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting Performance Standards: Concepts, Methods and Perspectives (pp. 53-88). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Kane, M.T. 2002. Conducting standard-setting studies based on standards of practice. The Bar Examiner, November. Kenyon, D.M. 2006a. The Bridge Study Between Tests of English Proficiency and ACCESS for ELLS, Part IIA: IPT Results. Available: http://www.wida.us/assessment/ACCESS/TechReports/Bridge%20 Study%20Report%20Part%202A%20-%20IPT%20Results.pdf [December 2010]. Kenyon, D.M. 2006b. The Bridge Study Between Tests of English Proficiency and ACCESS for ELLS, Part IIB: LAS Results. Available: http://www.wida.us/assessment/ACCESS/TechReports/Bridge%20 Study%20Report%20Part%202B%20-%20LAS%20Results.pdf [December 2010]. Kenyon, D.M. 2006c. The Bridge Study Between Tests of English Proficiency and ACCESS for ELLS, Part IID: MAC II Results. Available: http://www.wida.us/assessment/ACCESS/TechReports/Bridge%20 Study%20Report%20Part%202D%20-%20MAC%20II%20Results.pdf [December 2010]. Kenyon, D.M. 2006d. The Bridge Study Between Tests of English Proficiency and ACCESS for ELLS, Part IIC: LPTS Results. Available: http://www.wida.us/assessment/ACCESS/TechReports/Bridge%20 Study%20Report%20Part%202C%20-%20LPTS%20Results.pdf [December 2010]. Kim, J., and Herman, J.L. 2009. A Three-State Study of English Learner Progress. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, University of California. Kingston, N.M., Kahl, S.R., Sweeney, K.P. and Bay, L. 2001. Setting performance standards using the body of work method. In G.J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting Performance Standards: Concepts, Methods, and Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Kiplinger, V.L. 1996. Investigation of Factors Affecting Mathematics Achievement in the Eighth Grade: Academic Performance in Hawaii’s Public Schools. Unpublished dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder. Kolen, M.J., and Brennan, R.L. 2004. Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking: Methods and Practices (2nd ed.). New York: Springer. Kominski, R. 1989. How Good Is “How Well”? An Examination of the Census English Speaking Ability Ques- tion. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. Kubiszyn, T., and Borich, G. 2007. Educational Testing and Measurement (8th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons. Lara, J., Ferrara, S., Calliope, M., Sewell, D., Winter, P., Kopriva, R., et al. 2007. The English Language Development Assessment (ELDA). In J. Abedi (Ed.), English Language Proficiency Assessment in the Nation: Current Status and Future Practice (pp. 47-60). Davis: University of California. Lewis, D.M., Mitzel, H.C., and Green, D.R. 1996. Standard setting: A bookmark approach. In D.R. Green (Chair), IRT-Based Procedures Using Behavioral Anchoring Symposium conducted at the Council of Chief School Officers National Conference on Large Scale Assessment, Phoenix, AZ. Linn, R.L. 1993. Linking results of distinct assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 6, 83-102. Livingston, S.A., and Zieky, M.J. 1982. Passing Scores: A Manual for Setting Standards of Performance on Educational and Occupational Tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Loomis, S.C. 2001. Judging Evidence of the Validity of the National Assessment of Educational Progress Achievement Levels. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Council of Chief State Schools Officers, Houston, TX.

OCR for page 171
175 REFERENCES MacGregor, D., Kenyon, D., Gibson, S., and Evans, E. 2009. Development and Field Test of Kindergarten ACCESS for ELLs®. Madison, WI: WIDA Consortium. Mathews, G. 2007. Developing the Mountain West Assessment. In J. Abedi (Ed.), English Language Proficiency Assessment in the Nation: Current Status and Future Practice (pp. 33-45). Davis: University of California. McArthur, E.K. 1991. Characteristics of Persons in the United States by Language Spoken: 1979 and 1989. Unpublished paper, National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC. Mislevy, R.J. 1992. Linking Educational Assessments: Concepts, Issues, Methods and Prospects. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Mitzel, H.C., Lewis, D.M., Patz, R.J. and Green, D.R. 2001. The bookmark procedure: Psychological perspectives. In G.J. Cizek (Ed), Setting Performance Standards: Concepts, Methods, and Perspectives (pp. 249-281). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Musick, M.D. 2000. Can we talk?…About how to make education standards high enough in your state. Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Educational Board. Retrieved May 3, 2010 from http://www.sreb. org/main/highschools/accountability/settingstandardshigh.asp. National Research Council. 1995. Modernizing the U.S. Census. Panel on Census Requirements in the Year 2000 and Beyond, B. Edmonston and C. Schultze (Eds.). Committee on National Statistics. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Acad - emy Press. National Research Council. 1999a. Embedding Questions: The Pursuit of a Common Measure in Uncommon Tests. D.M. Koretz, M.W. Bertenthal, and B.F. Green (Eds.). Committee on Embedding Common Test Items in State and District Assessments. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 1999b. Uncommon Measures: Equivalence and Linkage Among Educational Tests. M.J. Feuer, P.W. Holland, B.F. Green, M.W. Bertenthal, and F. Cadelle Hemphill (Eds.). Committee on Equivalency and Linkage of Educational Tests. Board on Testing and Assessment. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Acad - emy Press. National Research Council. 2001. Choosing the Right Formula: Initial Report. Panel on Formula Alloca- tions. T.B. Jabine, T.A. Louis, and A.L. Schirm (Eds.). Committee on National Statistics. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Panel to Review the 2000 Census. C.F. Citro, D.L. Cork, and J.L. Norwood (Eds.). Committee on National Statistics. Divi - sion of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. 2005. Measuring Literacy: Performance Levels for Adults. Committee on Performance Levels for Adult Literacy. R.M. Hauser, C.F. Edley, Jr., J.A Koenig, and S.W. Elliott (Eds.). Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. 2007. Using the American Community Survey—Benefits and Challenges, 2007. Panel on the Functionality and Usability of Data from the American Community Survey. C.F. Citro and G. Kalton (Eds.). Committee on National Statistics. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. New Jersey Department of Education. 2010. Immigrant Student Count. Available: http://homeroom.state. nj.us/isge/UserManual2010.htm [December 2010}. New York State Department of Education. 2006. New York State English as a Second Language Achieve- ment Test, Technical Manual. Available: http://www.p12.nysed.gov/osa/reports/nyseslat-techrep-06. pdf [December 2010]. New York State Department of Education. 2009a. New York State English as a Second Language Achieve- ment Test. Available: http://www.p12.nysed.gov/osa/nyseslat/sam-cr09.pdf [December 2010].

OCR for page 171
176 ALLOCATING FEDERAL FUNDS New York State Department of Education. 2009b. Performance Indicators by Grade Level. The Teaching of Language Arts to Limited English Proficient /English Language Learners: Learning Standards for English as a Second Language. Available: http://www.p12.nysed.gov/biling/resource/ESL/standards. html [December 2010]. New York State Department of Education. 2009c. New York State English as a Second Language Achieve- ment Test School, Administrator’s Manual. Available: http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/osa/nyseslat/ sam-cr09.pdf [December 2010]. New York State Department of Education. 2011. NYSESLAT Parent’s Guide. Available: http://www.p12. nysed.gov/osa/nyseslat/ [February 2011). Ohio Department of Education. 2009. Ohio Test of English Language Acquisition. Ohio Department of Learning. Available: http://education.ohio.gov/GD/Templates/Pages/ODE/ODEDetail.aspx?page= 3&TopicRelationID=500&ContentID=8402&Content=69206 [December 2010]. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2003. Quality Framework and Guide- lines for OECD Statistical Activities. Version 2003/1. Available: http://www.oecd.org/ dataoecd/26/42/21688835.pdf [December 2010]. Parker, C.E., Louie, J., and O’Dwyer, L. 2009. New Measures of English Language Proficiency and Their Relationship to Performance on Large-Scale Content Assessments (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2009-No. 066). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Labora - tory Northeast and Islands. Available: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs [December 2010]. Passel, J.S., Hook, J.V., and Bean, F.D. 2006. Estimates by Migrant Status: Narrative Profile with Adjoin- ing Tables of Unauthorized Migrants and Other Immigrants, Based on Census 2000: Characteristics and Methods. U.S. Bureau of the Census and Sabre Systems Statistical and Demographic Analyses, Immigration Studies White Papers. Available: http://www.sabresystems.com/sd_whitepapers_im - migration.asp [December 2010]. Porta, S., and Vega, J. 2007. Appendix A: Overview of existing English Language proficiency tests. In J. Abedi (Ed.), English Language Proficiency Assessment in the Nation: Current Status and Future Practice (pp. 133-189). Davis, CA: University of California, School of Education. Available: http://educa - tion.ucdavis.edu/research/ELP_Report.pdf [December 2010]. Professional Testing Incorporated. 2006. Test Reliability. Available: http://www.proftesting.com/test_top- ics/pdfs/test_quality_reliability.pdf [December 2010]. Reamer, A. 2010. Surveying for Dollars: The Role of the American Community Survey in the Geographic Distribution of Federal Funds. Metropolitan Policy Program. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution. Rebarber, T., Rybinski, P., Hauck, M., Scarcella, R., Buteux, A., Wang, J., et al. 2007. Designing the Comprehensive English Language Learner Assessment (CELLA) for the benefit of users. In J. Abedi (Ed.), English Language Proficiency Assessment in the Nation: Current Status and Future Practice (pp. 63-79). Davis: University of California. Reckase, M.D. 2000. The Evolution of the NAEP Achievement Levels Setting Process: A Summary of the Research and Development Efforts Conducted by ACT. Iowa City, IA: Act, Inc. Redstone, I., and Massey, D. 2003. Coming to Stay: An Analysis of the U.S. Census Question on Year of Arrival. Paper presented at the Population Association of America Annual Meeting, May 1-3, Min - neapolis, MN. Regan, A., and Lesaux, N. 2006. Federal, state, and district level English language learner program entry and exit requirements: Effects on the education of language minority learners. (20). Available: http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=abstract&id=683508&recNo=20&toc=1&uiLanguage=en [April 2011]. Rossell, C.H. 2000. Different Questions, Different Answers: A Critique of the Hakuta, Butler, and Witt Report—How Long Does It Take English Learners to Attain Proficiency? Read Perspectives. Washington, DC: Education Resources Information Center. Scarcella, R. 2008. Conversational Analysis in L2 Acquisition and Teaching. Cambridge, England: Cam- bridge University Press.

OCR for page 171
177 REFERENCES Schmidley, D., and Robinson, J.G. 2003. Measuring the Foreign-Born Population in the United States with the Current Population Survey: 1994-2002. Population Division working paper number 73. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Shin, H.B. 2008. Comparison of the Estimates on Language Use and English Speaking Ability for the ACS, the C2SS, and Census 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Available: http://www.census. gov/acs/www/Downloads/library/2008/Language_Comparison_Report_2008-03.pdf [December 2010]. Short, D.J., and Fitzsimmons, S. 2007 A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. Available: http://www.all4ed.org/files/DoubleWork.pdf [April 2011]. Siegel, P., Martin, E., and Bruno, R. 2001. Language Use and Linguistic Isolation: Historical Data and Methodological Issues. Prepared for the session on Language Differences and Linguistic Isolation at the FCSM Statistical Policy Seminar, November 8-9, 2000, Bethesda, MD. Statistics Canada. 2009. Statistics Canada Quality Guidelines (5th ed.), Catalogue No. 12-539-X. Avail- able: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/12-539-x/12-539-x2009001-eng.pdf [December 2010]. Stephenson, A. 2003. Establishing Performance Levels for the Standard English Language Proficiency Test. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment. Texas Education Agency. n.d. TELPAS Proficiency Level Descriptors. TELPAS English Language Proficiency Assessment System. Available: http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/ELL/TELPAS-PLDs.pdf [December 2010]. Texas Education Agency. 2002. State Accountability Data Tables, Base Indicators. Austin: Texas Depart- ment of Education. Texas Education Agency. 2008a. Appendix C. Technical Digest 2007-2008. Available: http://ritter.tea.state. tx.us/student.assessment/resources/techdigest/2008/appendix_c.pdf [December 2010]. Texas Education Agency. 2008b. Chapter 16: Reliability. Technical Digest 2007-2008. Available: http:// ritter.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/resources/techdigest/2008/chapter_16.pdf [December 2010]. Texas Education Agency. 2008c. Chapter 17: Validity. Technical Digest 2007-2008. Available: http://ritter. tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/resources/techdigest/2008/chapter_17.pdf [December 2010]. Texas Education Agency. 2008d. TELPAS Reading Information Booklet. TELPAS English Language Pro- ficiency Assessment System. Available: http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/admin/rpte/ TP08_InfoBook.pdf [December 2010]. Texas Education Agency. 2009a. Manual for Raters and Administrators. TELPAS English Language Profi- ciency Assessment System. Available: http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/resources/guides/ test_admin/2009/TELPAS_Manual_2009.pdf [December 2010]. Texas Education Agency. 2009b. Program Overview. Available: http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/student.as- sessment/resources/guides/interpretive/2009_Interpretive_Guide_TELPAS.pdf [December 2010]. Texas Education Agency. 2009c. Technical Digest 2008-2009. Available: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index3. aspx?id=2147484418&menu_id=793 [December 2010]. U.S. Census Bureau. 2007. Weighting and estimation. In Design and Methodology Report. Available: http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/survey_methodology/acs_design_methodology_ch11. pdf [December 2010]. U.S. Census Bureau. 2010. U.S. Census Bureau Statistical Quality Standards. Available: http://www.census. gov/quality/standards/Quality_Standards_June2010.pdf [December 2010]. U.S. Department of Commerce. 1978. Report on Statistics for the Allocation of Funds. Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology, Statistical Policy Working Paper No. 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov - ernment Printing Office. Available: http://www.fcsm.gov/working-papers/spwp1.html [December 2010]. U.S. Department of Education. 1987. Numbers of Limited English Proficient Children: National, State, and Language-Specific Estimates. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Budget and Evaluation.

OCR for page 171
178 ALLOCATING FEDERAL FUNDS U.S. Department of Education. 2005a. Biennial Evaluation Report to Congress on the Implementation of Title III, Part A of the ESEA. Office of English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement for Limited English Proficient Students. Washington, DC: Author. U.S. Department of Education. 2005b. Letter to Title III State Directors. Office of English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement for Limited English Proficient Students. Washington, DC: Author. Available: http://wvconnections.k12.wv.us/documents/Time - lineforELPAssessment.doc [December 2010]. U.S. Department of Education. 2008a. Biennial Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Title III State Formula Grant Program, School Years 2004-2006. Office of English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement for Limited English Proficient Students. Washington, DC: Author. U.S. Department of Education. 2008b. Notice of Final Interpretations. Title III of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Office of English Language Acquisition. Washington, DC: Author. U.S. Department of Education. 2010a. EDFacts Workbook SY 2009-2010 (Version 6.0). Available: http:// www2.ed.gov/about/inits/ed/edfacts/eden/09-10-workbook-6-0.pdf [December 2010]. U.S. Department of Education. 2010b. Title III Policy. State of the States. ESEA Evaluation Brief: The English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement Act. Washington, DC: Author. U.S. Government Accountability Office. 2006a. Assistance from Education Could Help States Better Mea- sure Progress of Students with Limited English Proficiency. GAO 06-815. Washington, DC: Author. U.S. Government Accountability Office. 2006b. Education’s Data Improvement Efforts Could Strengthen the Basis for Distributing Title III Funds. GAO-07-140. Washington, DC: Author. Washington State Department of Education. 2008a. Language Proficiency Levels. ELD Content Stan- dards—State of Washington. Available: http://www.k12.wa.us/MigrantBilingual/ELD.aspx [Decem- ber 2010]. Washington State Department of Education. 2008b. Washington Proficiency Levels. Washington As- sessment and Testing Web. Available: htttp://www.k12.wa.us/assessment/WLPTII/pubdocs/200 8/2008EnglishTranslationLetter.pdf. Washington State Department of Education. 2008c. WLPT-II Placement Test Training. Available: http:// www.k12.wa.us/assessment/WLPTII/pubdocs/2008/WLPT-IIPlacementTestOverview.pdf. Washington State Department of Education. 2009a. WLPT-II Cut Scores. Available: http://www.k12. wa.us/assessment/WLPTII/pubdocs/2009/2009WLPT-IICutScaleScores.pdf. Washington State Department of Education. 2009b. WLPT-II Technical Report. Available: http://www. k12.wa.us/assessment/pubdocs/WLPT-II2009TechnicalReport.pdf [December 2010]. WIDA Consortium. 2006a. Annual Technical Report No. 1-Volume 1 of 3: Description, Validity, and Stu- dent Results (2004-2005). Technical Reports and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). Available: http://www.wida.us/assessment/ACCESS/TechReports/1%20Tech%20Rpt%201%20Series%20 100.pdf [December 2010]. WIDA Consortium. 2006b. Technical Report No. 1-Development and Field Test of ACCESS for ELLs. Madison, WI: Author. WIDA Consortium. 2006c. The Bridge Study between Tests of English Language Proficiency and ACCESS for ELLs. Part II A: IPT Results Technical Report No. 1. Available: http://www.wida.us/assessment/ ACCESS/TechReports/Bridge%20Study%20Report%20Part%202A%20-%20IPT%20Results.pdf [December 2010]. WIDA Consortium. 2006d. The Bridge Study between Tests of English Language Proficiency and ACCESS for ELLs. Part II B: LAS Results Technical Report No. 2. Available: http://www.wida.us/assessment/ ACCESS/TechReports/Bridge%20Study%20Report%20Part%202B%20-%20LAS%20Results.pdf [December 2010].

OCR for page 171
179 REFERENCES WIDA Consortium. 2006e. The Bridge Study between Tests of English Language Proficiency and ACCESS for ELLs. Part II C: LPTS Results Technical Report No. 2. Available: http://www.wida.us/assessment/ ACCESS/TechReports/Bridge%20Study%20Report%20Part%202C%20-%20LPTS%20Results. pdf [December 2010]. WIDA Consortium. 2006f. The Bridge Study between Tests of English Language Proficiency and ACCESS for ELLs. Part II D: MAC II Results Technical Report No. 2. Available: http://www.wida.us/assessment/ ACCESS/TechReports/Bridge%20Study%20Report%20Part%202D%20-%20MAC%20II%20 Results.pdf [December 2010]. WIDA Consortium. 2007. Understanding the WIDA ELP Standards. Available: http://www.wida.us/ standards/Resource. WIDA Consortium. 2009a. ACCESS for ELLs Teacher Report. WIDA Site-North Carolina. Madison, WI: Author. WIDA Consortium. 2009b. Annual Technical Report No. 4-Volume 1 of 3: Description, Validity, and Stu - dent Results (2007-2008). Technical Reports and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). Available: http://www.wida.us/assessment/ACCESS/TechReports/1%20Tech%20Rpt%204%20Series%201 03.pdf [December 2010]. WIDA Consortium. 2009c. Interpretive Guide for Score Reports. ACCESS for ELLs Score Reports. Avail- able: http://www.wida.us/assessment/ACCESS/ScoreReports/ACCESS_Interpretive_Guide09.pdf [December 2010]. WIDA Consortium. 2009d. WIDA tally: Hawaii joins testing consortium. WIDA News, July 8. Available: http://www.wida.us/index.aspx [December 2010]. WIDA Consortium. 2009e. WIDA tally: New Mexico joins consortium. WIDA News, November 2. Available: http://www.wida.us/index.aspx [December 2010]. WIDA Consortium. 2009f. White Paper on Methods of Establishing English Language Proficiency using State Content and Language Proficiency Assessments. Madison, WI: Author. Wolf, M., Kao, J., Griffin, N., Herman, J., Bachman, P., Chang, S., and Farnsworth, T. 2008. Issues in Assessing English Language Learners: English Language Proficiency Measures and Accommodation Uses: Literature Review. Available: http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/rsearch.asp [December 2010]. Zehler, A.M., Hopstock, P.J., Fleischman, H.L., and Greniuk, C. 1994. An Examination of Assessment of Limited English Proficient Students. Arlington, VA: Development Associates, Special Issues Analysis Center. Zeiky, M. 2001. So much has changed: How the setting of cutscores has evolved since the 1980s. In G. Cizek (Ed.), In Setting Performance Standards: Concepts, Methods and Perspectives (pp. 19-51). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

OCR for page 171