USGS (United States Geological Survey), 2007. The Plan to Coordinate NEHRP Post-Earthquake Investigations. Prepared in Coordination with the Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Science Foundation, and National Institute of Standards and Technology. USGS Circular 1242. Available at (accessed August 16, 2010).

Vugrin, E., Warren, D., Ehlen, N., Rose, A., and Barrett, A, 2009. Chemical Supply Chain and Resilience Project: A Resilience Definition for Use in Economic and Critical Infrastructure Resilience Analysis. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM and National Center for Risk and Economic Analysis of Terrorism Events (CREATE), University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, August 24.

Wald, D. J., B. Worden, V. Quitoriano, and J. Goltz, 2001. Practical Applications for Earthquake Scenarios Using ShakeMap. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2001, abstract #S32D-01.

Weaver, C., B.L. Sherrod, R.A. Haugerud, K.L. Meagher, A.D. Franke, S.P. Palmer, and R.J. Blakely, 2005. The scenario earthquake and ground motions. Chapter 1 in M. Stewart, (ed.), Scenario for a Magnitude 6.7 Earthquake on the Seattle Fault. Oakland, CA, EERI, and Camp Murray, WA, Washington Military Department, Emergency Management Division.

Webb, G.R., K.J. Tierney, and J.M. Dahlhamer, 2000. Business and disasters: Empirical patterns and unanswered questions. Natural Hazards Review 1: 83–90.

Whitehead, J., S. Pattanayek, B. Houtven, and B. Gelso, 2008. Combining revealed and stated preference data to estimate the nonmarket value of ecological services: An assessment of the state of the science. Journal of Economic Surveys 22: 874–908.

Whitehead, J., and A. Rose, 2009. Estimating environmental benefits of natural hazard mitigation: Results from a benefit-cost analysis of FEMA mitigation grants. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 14: 655–676.

Whittaker, A.S., and R.C. Krumme, 1993. Structural Control Using Shapememory Alloys. E*Sorb Systems Report No. 9301. Berkeley, CA.

Williams, M.L., K.M. Fischer, J.T. Freymueller, B. Tikoff, A.M. Trehu, et al., 2010. Unlocking the Secrets of the North American Continent: An EarthScope Science Plan for 2010-2020, February, 2010. 78 pp. Available at (accessed October 4, 2010).

WGCEP (Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities), 2008. The Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 2 (UCERF 2), U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 2007-1437. Reston, VA.

Zechar, J.D., D. Schorlemmer, M. Liukis, J. Yu, F. Euchner, P.J. Maechling, and T. H. Jordan, 2009. The Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability perspectives on computational earth science, Concurrency & Computation 22: 1836–1847.

Zhang, Y., and W.G. Peacock, 2010. Planning for Housing Recovery? Lessons Learned From Hurricane Andrew. Journal of the American Planning Association 76: 1, 5–24.

Zielke, O., J. R. Arrowsmith, L. G. Ludwig, and S. O. Akciz, 2010. Slip in the 1857 and Earlier Large Earthquakes Along the Carrizo Plain, San Andreas Fault. DOI:10.1126/science.1182781. Science 327: 1119–1122.

Zoback, M.L., and P. Grossi, 2010. The next Hayward earthquake—who will pay? Pp. XXX–XXX in K. Knudsen, J. Baldwin, T. Brocher, R. Burgmann, M. Craig, D. Cushing, P. Hellweg, M. Wiegers, and I. Wog, (eds.), Proceedings of the Third Conference on Earthquake Hazards in the eastern San Francisco Bay Area. California Geological Survey, Special Publication xxx.

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001

Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement