Start this session with a one-minute written response to the following question:

Reflecting on the panel discussion, from your experience what top three promising practices would you identify? Please list the promising practice, related outcomes, goals, audience, and context in which the practice is best suited.


In a round robin format, discuss why these were the top picks and what the state of the evidence is related to each practice.

4:15 p.m.

Report out by small groups

4:45 p.m.

Steering committee’s and participants’ final reflections

5:30 p.m.




Jeffrey Froyd, Texas A&M University

Bruce Grant, Widener University

Jose Mestre, University of Illinois, Urbana/Champaign

Cathy Middlecamp, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Helen King, Helen King Consultancy

Jeanne Narum, Project Kaleidoscope

Edward Redish, University of Maryland

Philip Sadler, Harvard University

William Wood, University of Colorado, Boulder

Invited Guests

Susan Albertine, Association of American Colleges and Universities

Robert Beichner, North Carolina State University

Myles Boylan, National Science Foundation

Celeste Carter, National Science Foundation

Amber Coleman, Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology, National Research Council

Mark Connolly, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Malcolm Drewery, National Academy of Engineering

Adam Fagen, Board on Life Sciences, National Research Council

Adam Gamoran, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Pamela Hines , American Association for the Advancement of Science

The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement