. "Appendix B: October Workshop Agenda and Participants List." Promising Practices in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education: Summary of Two Workshops. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Promising Practices in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education: Summary of Two Workshops
2:45-3:30 p.m.
Small-group discussion of Sessions 1-3
Discussion questions:
Which practices have the strongest evidence?
Where are the gaps in the evidence?
What kinds of outcomes are commonly assessed?
Are these sufficient for establishing effectiveness?
What kinds of assessments were used to measure these outcomes?
How adequate are these assessments, and are new assessments needed to accurately measure all possible outcomes?
Do you see ways that the evidence across the different practices converges?
What are the implications for broad dissemination of the practices?
What are the implications for future research on these practices?
3:30-4:00 p.m.
Report out by small groups
4:00-5:15 p.m.
Session 4: Doing Science—Providing Research Experiences
Moderator: David Mogk, Montana State University
4:00 p.m.
Evaluation of the University of Michigan UROP Program
Sandy Gregerman, University of Michigan
4:15 p.m.
Center for Authentic Science Practice in Education
