National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$34.75
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NAKFI Seeing the Future with Imaging Science: Interdisciplinary Research Team Summaries (2011)

Citation Manager

. "IDR Team Summary 8: Develop image-specialized database tools for data stewardship and system design in large-scale applications.." NAKFI Seeing the Future with Imaging Science: Interdisciplinary Research Team Summaries. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
102
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Seeing the Future with Imaging Science: Interdisciplinary Research Team Summaries

of natural phenomenon. The aggregation of these data can have applications in a wide range of fields including law, education, business, and medicine.

There is an opportunity—and a need—to design imaging systems from the ground up, keeping both hardware and software in mind. The systems should facilitate the validation, preservation, and analysis of massive amounts of data. For example, the next generation of MR scanners should incorporate the software design team in the first stages of system planning, and the instruments should be engineered for the Exabyte scale. This type of engineering will require the cooperation of research scientists spanning the imaging community and software communities; these individuals typically have very different skill sets and are trained in different university or corporate programs.

Key Questions

  • What would it take to build a software infrastructure so that imaging systems developers can easily incorporate large-scale data sharing and data analysis, thereby enabling important information to be coordinated within/among a large user group?

  • Are there successful models, such as databases for face recognition and finger printing, that might be used as a model for other organizations, such as MR anatomical and functional data?

  • Are there common architectural and computational needs across multiple types of imaging modalities for storing, validating quality, and analyzing image databases? Are there general ontologies for imaging data that might be derived from the images themselves, rather than by labels added by the users in the metadata?

Reading

Brown MS, Shah SK, Pais RC, Lee YZ, McNitt-Gray MF, Goldin JG, Cardenas AF, Aberle DR. Database design and implementation for quantitative image analysis research. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2005 Mar;9(1):99-108. Accessed online June 15, 2010.

Marcus DS, Archiw KA, Olsen TR, Ramarathnam M. The open-source neuroimaging research enterprise. J Digital Imaging epub 2001 Aug 21; Suppl 1:130-8. Accessed online June 15, 2010.

Small SL, Wilde M, Kenny S, Andric M, Hasson U. Database-managed grid-enabled analysis of neuroimaging data: the CNARI framework. Int J Psychophysiol epub 2009 Feb 20, 2009 Jul;73(1):62-72. Abstract accessed online June 15, 2010.

Page
102