be at least two orders of magnitude higher than the long-term average (Hassan et al., 2005), a rate potentially commensurate with the largest mass extinctions of the geological past (Sepkoski, 1996; Bambach, 2006). Modeling future biodiversity losses and their effects on the Earth’s ecosystems and climate, however, is inherently difficult (Botkin et al., 2007), making it imperative to assess the outcome of equivalent “natural experiments” in the geological record (NRC, 1995; Myers and Knoll, 2001). The five major, and dozens of minor, mass extinctions of the past half-billion years (Sepkoski, 1996; Bambach, 2006) offer unique insights regarding ecosystem susceptibility and response to environmental stress, the potential for ecological collapse, and the mechanisms of ecosystem recovery (Benton and Twitchett, 2003; Bottjer et al., 2008). Furthermore, the integration of paleontologic, stratigraphic, and geochemical records for many intervals of the past half-billion years have revealed the variable character of past biotic turnovers and mass extinction events (e.g., Boxes 2.4, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8), which differ in regard not only to severity but also to duration, selectivity, and the nature of environmental stresses (e.g., the transition out of supergreenhouse conditions into Ordovician glaciation [Trotter et al., 2008]; the Early to Middle Triassic radiations [Payne et al., 2004]; the nannoplankton crisis and foraminiferal turnovers of the Cretaceous ocean anoxic events [Leckie et al., 2002]; Eocene-Oligocene faunal extinction and immigration [Kobashi et al., 2001; Ivany et al., 2004]). Most importantly, the geological record uniquely captures past climate-ecological interactions that are fully played out and thereby archive the impact, response, interaction, and recovery from past global warming and major climate transitions.