Barth, C. 1995. Nutrients: from the lawn to the stream. Watershed Protection Techniques 2(1):239-246.

Batie, Sandra S. 2009. Green Payments and the U.S. Farm Bill: Information and Policy Challenges. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7(7):380-388.

Baxter, C. A., B. C. Joern, D. Ragland, J. S. Sands, and O. Adeola. 2003. Phytase, high-available phosphorus corn, and storage effects on phosphorus levels in pig excreta. Journal of Environmental Quality 32:1481-1489.

Becker, J. G., and Graves, R. E. 2004. Ammonia Emissions and Animal Agriculture. CSREES Mid-Atlantic Regional Water Quality Program. Available at http://agenvpolicy.aers.psu.edu/Documents/BeckerGravesAmmonia101.pdf. Accessed April 17, 2011.

Birch, M. B. L., B. M. Gramig, W. R. Moomaw, O. C. Doering, and C. J. Reeling. 2011. Why metrics matter: Evaluating policy choices for reactive nitrogen in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Environmental Science and Technology 45(1):168-174.

Blankenship, K. 2006. Impact from watershed’s population growth may overtake gains in Bay cleanup. Chesapeake Bay Journal 16(8). Available at http://www.bayjournal.com/article.cfm?article=2923. Accessed December 22, 2010.

Blankenship, K. 2008. Farm bill includes huge influx of new conservation funds for Bay watershed. Chesapeake Bay Journal (June). Available at http://www.bayjournal.com/article.cfm?article=3348. Accessed January 23, 2011.

Blankenship, K. 2010. Public, in comments, weighs pros and cons of TMDL for Bay. Chesapeake Bay Journal (December). Available at http://www.bayjournal.com/article.cfm?article=3977. Accessed April 29, 2011.

Blankenship, K. 2011. Study funded by ag group raises questions about Bay model. Chesapeake Bay Journal (April). Available at http://www.bayjournal.com/article.cfm?article=4052. Accessed April 17, 2011.

Boesch, D. F. 2006. Scientific requirements for ecosystem-based management in the restoration of Chesapeake Bay and Coastal Louisiana. Ecological Engineering 26:6-26.

Boesch, D. R., and J. Greer, eds. 2003. Chesapeake Futures, Choices for the 21st Century. Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee Publication No. 03–001. Edgewater, MD: Chesapeake Research Consortium. Available at http://www.chesapeake.org/stac/futreport.html. Accessed December 22, 2010.

Boesch, D. F., R. B. Brinsfield, and R. E. Magnien. 2001. Chesapeake Bay eutrophication: scientific understanding, ecosystem restoration, and challenges for agriculture. Journal of Environmental Quality 30:303-320.

Boesch, D. F., V. J. Coles, D. G. Kimmel, and W. D. Miller. 2007. Coastal dead zones and global climate change: Ramifications of climate change for Chesapeake Bay hypoxia. In Regional Impacts of Climate Change: Four Case Studies in the United States. Prepared for the Pew Center on Global Climate Change. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.

Boynton, W. R., J. H. Barber, R. Summers, and W. M. Kemp. 1995. Inputs, transformations, and transport of nitrogen and phosphorus in Chesapeake Bay and selected tributaries. Estuaries 18:285-314.

Boynton, W. R., J. D. Hagy, J. C. Cornwell, W. M. Kemp, S. M. Greene, M. S. Owens, J. E. Baker, and R. K. Larsen. 2008. Nutrient budgets and management actions in the Patuxent River estuary, Maryland. Estuaries and Coasts 31:623-651.

Bricker, S., B. Longstaff, W. Dennison, A. Jones, K. Boicourt, C. Wicks, and J. Woerner. 2007. Effects of Nutrient Enrichment in the Nation’s Estuaries—A Decade of Change: NOAA Coastal Ocean Program Decision Analysis Series No. 26. Silver Spring, MD: National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science.

Brush, G. S. 2009. Historic land use, nitrogen, and coastal eutrophication: A paleoecological perspective. Estuaries and Coasts 32:18-28.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement