National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$45.25
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

Related Titles

topleft topright

Review of the Environmental Protection Agency's Draft IRIS Assessment of Formaldehyde (2011)
Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology (BEST)

Citation Manager

. "7 A Roadmap for Revision." Review of the Environmental Protection Agency's Draft IRIS Assessment of Formaldehyde. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
167
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Review of the Environmental Protection Agency’s Draft Iris Assessment of Formaldehyde

[online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/standards/pm/data/PM_RA_FINAL_June_2010.pdf [accessed March 2, 2011].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2010b. Policy Assessment for the Review of the Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards (Second External Review Draft). EPA 452/P-10-007. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Office of Air and Radiation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. June 2010 [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/ttnnaaqs/standards/pm/data/20100630seconddraftpmpa.pdf [accessed March 2, 2011].

Hill, A.B. 1965. The environment and disease: Association or causation? Proc. R. Soc. Med. 58:295-300

IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2008. Improving the Presumptive Disability Decision-Making Process for Veterans. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 1983. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 2009. Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Normand, S.L. 1999. Meta-analysis: Formulating, evaluating, combining, and reporting. Stat. Med. 18(3): 321-359.

Samet, J.M. 2010. CASAC Review of Policy Assessment for the Review of the PM NAAQS - Second External Review Draft (June 2010). EPA-CASAC-10-015. Letter to Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator, from Jonathan M. Samet, Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, Office of Administrator, Science Advisory Board, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. September 10, 2010 [online]. Available: http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/CCF9F4C0500C500F8525779D0073C593/$File/EPA-CASAC-10-015-unsigned.pdf [accessed Nov. 22, 2010].

Stroup, D.F., J.A. Berlin, S.C. Morton, I. Olkin, G.D. Williamson, D. Rennie, D. Moher, B.J. Becker, T.A. Sipe, and S.B. Thacker. 2000. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 283(15):2008-2012.

White, R.H., I. Cote, L. Zeise, M. Fox, F. Dominici, T.A. Burke, P.D. White, D.B. Hattis, and J.M. Samet. 2009. State-of-the-science workshop report: Issues and approaches in low-dose-response extrapolation for environmental health risk assessment. Environ. Health Perspect. 117(2):283-287.

Page
167