Sander Greenland, The Need for Critical Appraisal of Expert Witnesses in Epidemiology and Statistics, 39 Wake Forest L. Rev. 291 (2004).

Khristine L. Hall & Ellen Silbergeld, Reappraising Epidemiology: A Response to Mr. Dore, 7 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 441 (1983).

Jay P. Kesan, Drug Development: Who Knows Where the Time Goes?: A Critical Examination of the Post-Daubert Scientific Evidence Landscape, 52 Food Drug Cosm. L.J. 225 (1997).

Jay P. Kesan, An Autopsy of Scientific Evidence in a Post-Daubert World, 84 Geo. L. Rev. 1985 (1996).

Constantine Kokkoris, Comment, DeLuca v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Statistical Significance and the Novel Scientific Technique, 58 Brook. L. Rev. 219 (1992).

James P. Leape, Quantitative Risk Assessment in Regulation of Environmental Carcinogens, 4 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 86 (1980).

David E. Lilienfeld, Overview of Epidemiology, 3 Shepard’s Expert & Sci. Evid. Q. 23 (1995).

Junius McElveen, Jr., & Pamela Eddy, Cancer and Toxic Substances: The Problem of Causation and the Use of Epidemiology, 33 Clev. St. L. Rev. 29 (1984).

Modern Scientific Evidence: The Law and Science of Expert Testimony (David L. Faigman et al. eds., 2009–2010).

Note, Development in the Law—Confronting the New Challenges of Scientific Evidence, 108 Harv. L. Rev. 1481 (1995).

Susan R. Poulter, Science and Toxic Torts: Is There a Rational Solution to the Problem of Causation? 7 High Tech. L.J. 189 (1992).

Jon Todd Powell, Comment, How to Tell the Truth with Statistics: A New Statistical Approach to Analyzing the Data in the Aftermath of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 31 Hous. L. Rev. 1241 (1994).

Restatement (Third) of Torts: Liability for Physical and Emotional Harm § 28, cmt. c & rptrs. note (2010).

David Rosenberg, The Causal Connection in Mass Exposure Cases: A Public Law Vision of the Tort System, 97 Harv. L. Rev. 849 (1984).

Joseph Sanders, The Bendectin Litigation: A Case Study in the Life-Cycle of Mass Torts, 43 Hastings L.J. 301 (1992).

Joseph Sanders, Scientific Validity, Admissibility, and Mass Torts After Daubert, 78 Minn. L. Rev. 1387 (1994).

Joseph Sanders & Julie Machal-Fulks, The Admissibility of Differential Diagnosis to Prove Causation in Toxic Tort Cases: The Interplay of Adjective and Substantive Law, 64 L. & Contemp. Probs. 107 (2001).

Palma J. Strand, The Inapplicability of Traditional Tort Analysis to Environmental Risks: The Example of Toxic Waste Pollution Victim Compensation, 35 Stan. L. Rev. 575 (1983).

Richard W. Wright, Causation in Tort Law, 73 Cal. L. Rev. 1735 (1985).



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement