Click for next page ( 22


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 21
NRC Assessment of Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy Technology Interim Letter Report REFERENCES Battey, H. 2010. U.S. Department of Energy Water Power Program. Presentation at the First Meeting of the Committee on Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy Technology Assessment. November 15, Washington, D.C. Battey, H. 2011. U.S. Department of Energy Water Power Program. Presentation at the Second Meeting of the Committee on Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy Technology Assessment. February 8, Washington, D.C. Chawla, A., H.L. Tolman, J.L. Hanson, E.-M. Devaliere, and V.M. Gerald. 2009. Validation of a Multi-Grid WAVEWATCH III Modeling System. 11th Waves Forecasting and Hindcasting Workshop, Halifax, Nova Scotia. DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). 2010. Short Summaries of DOE’s Marine and Hydrokinetic Resource Assessments. Washington, D.C. EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute). 2005. Final Summary Report, Project Definition Study, Offshore Wave Power Feasibility Demonstration Project. Washington, D.C. EPRI. 2007. Assessment of Waterpower Potential and Development Needs. Washington, D.C. EPRI. 2010. Wave Energy Resource Assessment and GIS Database for the U.S. Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy. Palo Alto, Calif. EPRI. 2011. Wave Energy Resource Assessment, Appendix A: Terminology and Equations. Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy. Palo Alto, Calif. Garnaud, X., and C.C. Mei. 2010. Bragg scattering and wave-power extraction by an array of small buoys. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., A 466 (2113): 79-106. Garrett, C., and P. Cummins. 2005. The power potential of tidal currents in channels. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 461: 2563-2572. Garrett, C., and P. Cummins. 2007. The efficiency of a turbine in a tidal channel. J. Fluid. Mech., 588: 243-251. Garrett, C., and P. Cummins. 2008. Limits to tidal current power. Renew. Energ. 33: 2485-2490. Garrett, C., and D.A. Greenberg. 1977. Predicting changes in tidal regime: The open boundary problem. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 7: 171-181. Georgia Tech Research Corporation. 2010. Assessment of Energy Production Potential from Tidal Streams in the United States. Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy. Atlanta, Ga. Georgia Tech Research Corporation. 2011. Assessment of Energy Production Potential from Tidal Streams in the United States. Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy. Atlanta, Ga. Haas, K., Z. Defne, H. Fritz, L. Jiang, S. French, and B. Smith. 2010. Assessment of Energy Production Potential from Tidal Streams in the United States. Presentation at the First Meeting of the Committee on Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy Technology Assessment. November 15, Washington, D.C. Haas, K., Z. Defne, H. Fritz, and L. Jiang. 2011. Assessment of Tidal Stream Energy Potential for the United States. Presentation at the Second Meeting of the Committee on Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy Technology Assessment. February 8, Washington, D.C. Hagerman, G., and P. Jacobson. 2011. Meaning and Value of U.S. Wave Energy Resource Assessments. Presentation at the Second Meeting of the Committee on Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy Technology Assessment. February 8, Washington, D.C. NRC Assessment of Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy Technology Interim Letter Report 21

OCR for page 21
NRC Assessment of Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy Technology Interim Letter Report Jacobson, P., G. Hagerman, and G. Scott. 2010. Assessment and Mapping of the U.S. Wave Energy Resource. Presentation at the First Meeting of the Committee on Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy Technology Assessment. November 15. Washington, D.C. Komar, P. 1998. Beach Processes and Sedimentation, 2nd ed. Prentice Hall. Mei, C. C. 1989. The Applied Dynamics of Ocean Surface Waves. Singapore: World Scientific. Neary, V., K. Stewart, and B. Smith. 2011. Validation of Tidal Current Resource Assessment. Presentation at the Second Meeting of the Committee on Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy Technology Assessment. February 8, Washington, D.C. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2011. The Tampa Bay Operational Forecast System (TBOFS): Model Development and Skill Assessment. NOAA Technical Report NOS CS 17. Sliver Spring, MD. ORNL (Oak Ridge National Laboratory). 2011. Validation of Tidal Current Resource Assessment Model. Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy. Oak Ridge, Tenn. Patchen, R. 2007. Establishment of a Delaware Bay Model Evaluation Environment. In Estuarine and Coastal Modeling, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference, Malcolm L. Spaulding (ed.). Nov. 5-7, 2007, Newport, Rhode Island. Scott, G. 2011. Validation and Display of Wave Energy Resource Estimates. Presentation at the Second Meeting of the Committee on Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy Technology Assessment. February 8, Washington, D.C. Shapiro, G.I. 2011. Effect of tidal stream power generation on the region-wide circulation in a shallow sea. Ocean Sci. 7: 165-174. Virginia Tech University. 2010. Methodology for Estimating Available Wave Energy Resource. Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy. Blacksburg, Va. Warner, J.C., W.R. Geyer, and J.A. Lerczak. 2005. Numerical modeling of an estuary: A comprehensive skill assessment. J. Geophys. Res. 110, C05001, doi:10.1029/2004JC002691. NRC Assessment of Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy Technology Interim Letter Report 22