Questions? Call 800-624-6242 About | Ordering | New Menu | Items in cart [0] SEARCH

Rights & Permissions Free PDF Access Sign in to download PDF book and chapters Free Resources PDF SUMMARY Display this book on your site! Related Titles Enabling America:Assessing the Role of Rehabilitation Science and Engineering Review of Disability and Rehabilitation Research: NIDRR Grantmaking Processes and Products Other Related Titles External Evaluation of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research and Its Grantees Letter Report (2011) Board on Human-Systems Integration (BOHSI) Citation Manager Export the bibliographic data for this book in your chosen format Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web. Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book. Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic. Citation Manager . "REFERENCES." External Evaluation of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research and Its Grantees Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011. Please select a format: Page 21   E-mail Share on facebook Facebook Share on delicious Delicious Share on stumbleupon Stumble Share on twitter Twitter More Sharing ServicesMore Page 21 Letter Report (1-20) REFERENCES (21-22) Attachment A Committee on the External Evaluation of NIDRR and Its Grantees (23-23) Attachment B Acknowledgment of Reviewers (24-24) Attachment C (25-39)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 21
REFERENCES Bernstein, A., Hick, V., Borbey, P., Campbell, T., McAuley, L., and Graham, I.D. (2007). A framework to measure the impacts of investments in health research. In Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (Eds.), Science, technology and innovation indicators in a changing world: Responding to policy needs (pp. 231-251). Ottawa: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Canadian Academy of Health Sciences. (2009). Making an impact: A preferred framework and indicators to measure returns on investment in health research. Appendices. Panel on Return on Investment in Health Research. Ottawa: Author. Chien, C.F., Chen, C.P., and Chen, C.H. (2009). Designing performance indices and a novel mechanism for evaluating government R&D project. Journal of Quality, 19(2), 119-134. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Publc Policy. (1999). Evaluating federal research programs: Research and Government Performance and Results Act. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Federal Register. (2006). Department of Education. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research—Notice of Final Long-Range Plan for Fiscal Years 2005–2009, Volume 71, No. 31, Feb. 15. Ismail, S., Tiessen, J., and Wooding, S. (2010). Strengthening research portfolio evaluation at the Medical Research Council: Developing a survey for the collection of information about research outputs. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. MacLennan, R.N. (1993). Interrater reliability with SPSS for Windows 5.0. American Statistician, 47(4), 292-296. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., and The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Available: http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1000097 [June 2011]. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. (2008, August). Meeting report of the NIDRR External Evaluation Advisory Group. Washington, DC: Author. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR). (2009). Briefing book for The National Academies. (Resources and documentation provided by NIDRR to The National Academies). Washington, DC: Author. National Research Council. (2007). Mining safety and health research at NIOSH. Committee to Review the NIOSH Mining Safety and Research Program. Report. No. 2, Reviews of research programs of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (2007). Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services: About NIDRR. Available: http:www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osers/nidrr/about.html [January 2011]. Research Triangle International. (2009). National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. Annual Performance Report: Web-based reporting system instruction manual. Research Triangle Park, NC: Author. Schulz K.F., Altman D.G., Moher D., for the CONSORT Group. (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Available: http://www.consort-statement.org/index.aspx?o=3444 [June 2011]. Wooding, S., and Starkey, T. (2010). Piloting the RAND/ARC Impact Scoring System (RAISS) tool in the Canadian context. Cambridge, UK: RAND Europe. 21

OCR for page 22
Wooding, S., Nason, E., Starkey, T., Haney, S., and Grant, J. (2009). Mapping the impact: Exploring the payback of arthritis research. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. Yaffee, R.A. (1998). Enhancement of reliability analysis: Application of intraclass correlations with SPSS/Windows v.8. Available: http://www.nyu.edu/its/statistics/Docs/intracls.html [April 2011]. 22