National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Attachment A Committee on the External Evaluation of NIDRR and Its Grantees
Suggested Citation:"Attachment B Acknowledgment of Reviewers." National Research Council. 2011. External Evaluation of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research and Its Grantees: Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13203.
×

Attachment B

Acknowledgment of Reviewers

This letter report has been reviewed in draft form by persons chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise in accordance with procedures approved by the Report Review Committee of the National Research Council. The purposes of the independent review are to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards of objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process.

We thank the following for their review of the letter report: Stephen H. Bell, senior fellow and principal scientist, Abt Associates, Inc., Bethesda, MD; Susan M. Daniels, president, Daniels & Associates, LLC, Washington, DC; Jody L. Fitzpatrick, School of Public Affairs, University of Colorado Denver; David B. Gray, Health Sciences, Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine; and John L. Melvin, Michie professor and chair, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University. Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations, nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of the letter report was overseen by the William C. Howell, Department of Psychology, Rice University and Arizona State University, and John C. Bailar III, professor emeritus, University of Chicago. Appointed by the National Research Council, they were responsible for making certain that an independent examination of the letter report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of the letter report rests entirely with the committee and the institution.

Suggested Citation:"Attachment B Acknowledgment of Reviewers." National Research Council. 2011. External Evaluation of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research and Its Grantees: Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13203.
×
Page 24
Next: Attachment C »
External Evaluation of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research and Its Grantees: Letter Report Get This Book
×
 External Evaluation of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research and Its Grantees: Letter Report
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research funds applied research and development to improve the lives and functioning of persons with disabilities. At the request of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR) within the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, U.S. Department of Education, the Board on Human-Systems Integration of the National Research Council (NRC) convened a committee to conduct an evaluation of aspects of NIDRR's program. Specifically, the committee was charged to assess the NIDRR priority-setting, peer review, and grant management processes, and to develop an overall framework and evaluation design for the review of grantee outputs for a sample of 30 grantees.

External Evaluation of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research and Its Grantees Letter Report discusses the procedures the committee used in its output evaluation, its assessment of those procedures, and recommendations for future evaluations. This report works to improve future evaluation practices and ensure that evaluation results optimally inform NIDRR's efforts to maximize the impact of its research grants. Additionally, it offers conclusions, recommendations, and suggestions on defining evaluation objectives, strengthening the output assessment, and using NIDRR's Annual Performance Reports system to capture data for future evaluations.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!