National Academies Press: OpenBook

Research-Doctorate Programs in the Biomedical Sciences: Selected Findings from the NRC Assessment (2011)

Chapter: 8 Administrative Questions about Biomedical Science Programs and Concluding Thoughts

« Previous: 7 Postdoctoral Scholars: An Extension of the Data
Suggested Citation:"8 Administrative Questions about Biomedical Science Programs and Concluding Thoughts." National Research Council. 2011. Research-Doctorate Programs in the Biomedical Sciences: Selected Findings from the NRC Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13213.
×

8

Administrative Questions about Biomedical Science Programs and Concluding Thoughts

Initially, the panel thought that it could contrast programs on the basis of two variables dealing with administration:

Was the program managed in a medical school or in a graduate school of arts and sciences?

Was the program part of a biomedical science “umbrella” program?

It turned out that neither question was straightforward for all programs.

MEDICAL SCHOOL OR GRADUATE SCHOOL

In an attempt to categorize programs correctly, the panel conducted an email inquiry of institutions with medical schools, asking them where their biomedical sciences programs were located administratively. A number of programs were shared between arts and sciences and the medical school. We had thought that medical schools might impose a more “professional school” model on their Ph.D. programs, that is, the expectation would be of completion in a fixed period of time, and the assumption would be that most enrollees would complete.

What we found was that some programs were administered jointly. The only unambiguous contrast we could make was between programs in the same field in the same institution. Even then, these programs were not strictly comparable—for example, in the field of pharmacology, toxicology, and environmental health, a single institution may have separate programs in each field. Given these uncertainties, it was difficult to make comparisons that the panel thought were reliable.

As an illustration of data that might be used to identify differences between programs in medical school and arts and sciences, Table 8-1 compares completion rates and median time to degree for five fields in which the panel was able to identify common programs at three or more institutions.

Suggested Citation:"8 Administrative Questions about Biomedical Science Programs and Concluding Thoughts." National Research Council. 2011. Research-Doctorate Programs in the Biomedical Sciences: Selected Findings from the NRC Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13213.
×

TABLE 8-1 Comparison of Completion Rates and Median Time to Degree for Programs in both Arts and Sciences and Medical Schools (by Percentages for Completion and Years for Time to Degree)

Field Number of Institutions with Common Programs A&S Program Aerage of Completion Rate Medical School Program Average of Completion Rate Med School minus A&S A&S Program MedianTime to Degree Medical School Program MedianTime to Degree Med School minus A&S
Biochemistry, Biophysics, and Structural Biology 8 46.83% 42.11% -4.71% 5.59 5.97 0.38
Cell and Developmental Biology 5 29.62% 56.72% 27.06% 6.6 5.9 -0.72
Immunology and Infectious Disease 3 60.50% 56.87% -3.60% 6.1 5.27 -0.83
Neuroscience and Neurobiology Pharmacology, Toxicology and 4 46.28% 41.55% -4.73% 5.87 5.72 -0.15
Environmental Health 8 50.15% 52.91% 2.75% 5.42 5.68 0.26

Suggested Citation:"8 Administrative Questions about Biomedical Science Programs and Concluding Thoughts." National Research Council. 2011. Research-Doctorate Programs in the Biomedical Sciences: Selected Findings from the NRC Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13213.
×

PROGRAMS IN INTEGRATED BIOLOGICAL AND BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES

The panel took a close look at the programs in the field of integrated biological and biomedical sciences. We wanted to use this diverse field to identify the programs in which students typically spend one year sampling research in different laboratories and then choose an area of specialization. However, the responding institutions provided data for individual fields, even when those fields were part of an umbrella program.

Using data from the Assessment survey of doctoral programs,1 the panel examined the ratio of the number of students who enrolled to the number of students who received offers of admission to see if the integrated biological and biomedical science programs were more popular (as indicated by a higher enrolled-to-offered ratio), but did not find any evidence of this. Such an effect may have been obscured by the ambiguities in the classification of programs.

______________

1 See Program Questionnaire, Question #C3, (Appendix D of the Assessment).

Suggested Citation:"8 Administrative Questions about Biomedical Science Programs and Concluding Thoughts." National Research Council. 2011. Research-Doctorate Programs in the Biomedical Sciences: Selected Findings from the NRC Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13213.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"8 Administrative Questions about Biomedical Science Programs and Concluding Thoughts." National Research Council. 2011. Research-Doctorate Programs in the Biomedical Sciences: Selected Findings from the NRC Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13213.
×
Page 47
Suggested Citation:"8 Administrative Questions about Biomedical Science Programs and Concluding Thoughts." National Research Council. 2011. Research-Doctorate Programs in the Biomedical Sciences: Selected Findings from the NRC Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13213.
×
Page 48
Suggested Citation:"8 Administrative Questions about Biomedical Science Programs and Concluding Thoughts." National Research Council. 2011. Research-Doctorate Programs in the Biomedical Sciences: Selected Findings from the NRC Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13213.
×
Page 49
Suggested Citation:"8 Administrative Questions about Biomedical Science Programs and Concluding Thoughts." National Research Council. 2011. Research-Doctorate Programs in the Biomedical Sciences: Selected Findings from the NRC Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13213.
×
Page 50
Next: APPENDIX A BIOGRAPHIES OF PANEL MEMBERS »
Research-Doctorate Programs in the Biomedical Sciences: Selected Findings from the NRC Assessment Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Research Doctorate Programs in the Biomedical Sciences: Selected Findings from the NRC Assessment examines data on the biomedical sciences programs to gather additional insight about the talent, training environment, outcomes, diversity, and international participation in the biomedical sciences workforce. This report supports an earlier publication, A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States, which analyzes data and rankings from more than 5,000 doctoral programs, 982 of which were in the biomedical sciences. Research Doctorate Programs in the Biomedical Sciences explores questions about degrees and completion rates as they relate to GRE scores, student funding, program facilities, diversity among faculty members, and other variables. The report examines 11 biomedical science fields including cell and developmental biology, genetics and genomics, microbiology, nutrition, and physiology, among others.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!