Public Telecomputing Network [online]. Available: http://www.iroquoisd/emocracy.pdx.edu/html/greatlaw.html [accessed Nov. 27, 2010].
NIH (National Institutes of Health). 2011. NIH Consensus Development Program. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health [online]. Available: http://consensus.nih.gov/ [accessed Feb. 7, 2011].
NRC (National Research Council). 1983. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NRC (National Research Council). 1989. Improving Risk Communication. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NRC (National Research Council). 1996. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
NRC (National Research Council). 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
NRC (National Research Council). 2009. Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
O’Connell, E., and F. Hurley. 2009. A review of the strengths and weaknesses of quantitative methods used in health impact assessment. Public Health 123(4):306-310.
Ozonoff, D. 1994. Conceptions and misconceptions about human health impact analysis. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 14(5/6):499-515.
Parry, J.M., and J.R. Kemm. 2005. Criteria for use in the evaluation of health impact assessments. Public Health 119(12):1122-1129.
Pate-Cornell, M.E. 1996. Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 54(2):95-111.
PCCRARM (Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management). 1997. Framework for Environmental Health Risk Management – Final Report, Vol. 1. [online]. Available: http://www.riskworld.com/nreports/1997/risk-rpt/pdf/EPAJAN.pdf [accessed July 28, 2011].
Petticrew, M. 2007. “More research needed”: Plugging gaps in the evidence base on health inequalities. Eur. J. Public Health 17(5):411-413.
Quigley, R., L. den Broeder, P. Furu, A. Bond, B. Cave, and R. Bos. 2006. Health Impact Assessment: International Best Practice Principles. Special Publication Series No. 5. Fargo: International Association for Impact Assessment. September 2006 [online]. Available: http://www.iaia.org/publicdocuments/special-publications/SP5.pdf [accessed May 6, 2011].
Rothman, K.J., and S. Greenland. 1998. Causality and causal inference. Pp. 7-28 in Modern Epidemiology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven.
RWJF/Pew (The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and The Pew Charitable Trusts). 2011. Health Impact Project [online]. Available: http://www.healthimpactproject.org/ [accessed May 25, 2011].
Schram-Bijkerk, D., E. van Kempen, A.B. Knol, H. Kruize, B. Staatsen, and I. van Kamp. 2009. Quantitative health impact assessment of transport policies: Two simulations related to speed limit reduction and traffic re-allocation in the Netherlands. Occup. Environ. Med. 66(10):691-698.
Steinemann, A. 2000. Rethinking human health impact assessment. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 20(6):627-645.
Susser, M. 1986. Rules of inference in epidemiology. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 6(2):116-128.
UNECE/REC (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe and Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe). 2007. Annex A5.2. Description of selected public participation tools. Pp. 197-206 in Protocol on SEA: Resource