Ginsburg, M., and K. Glasmire. 2004. Making tough choices: Adults with disabilities prioritize their Medi-Cal options. (accessed July 8, 2011).

______. 2007. Designing coverage: Uninsured Californians weigh the options. (accessed July 8, 2011).

Ginsburg, M., S. D. Goold, and M. Danis. 2006. (De)constructing basic benefits: Citizens define the limits of coverage. Health Affairs 25(6):1648-1655.

Gold, M. R., P. Franks, T. Siegelberg, and S. Sofaer. 2007. Does providing cost-effectiveness information change coverage priorities for citizens acting as social decision makers? Health Policy 83(1):65-72.

Goold, S. D., A. K. Biddle, H. Klipp, C. Hall, and M. Danis. 2005. Choosing Healthplans All Together: A deliberative exercise for allocating limited health care resources. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 30(4):563-601.

HHS (Department of Health and Human Services). 2010. Charter: Medicare Evidence Development & Coverage Advisory Committee. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Hirschman, A. O. 1970. Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

ISPOR (International Society for Pharmacoeonomics and Outcomes Research). 2011. ISPOR global health care systems road map: United States—health policy decision process. (accessed August 1, 2011).

McCoy, M. L., and P. L. Scully. 2002. Deliberative dialogue to expand civic engagement: What kind of talk does democracy need? (accessed July 8, 2011).

Menon, D., and T. Stafinski. 2011. Role of patient and public participation in health technology assessment and coverage decisions. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research 11(1):75-89.

Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and The Allina Foundation. 2001. Minnesota employees’ health care spending priorities: The CHAT project [unpublished]. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Chamber of Commerce.

NIH (National Institutes of Health). 2011. Engaging the public in priority setting for health. (accessed July 11, 2011).

North Dakota Insurance Department. 2011. About us: CHAT. (accessed July 11, 2011).

NRC (National Research Council). 1996. Understanding risk: Informing decisions in a democratic society. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Ohio Department of Insurance. 2009. Ohio CHATs about healthcare: Voices of the uninsured. (accessed July 11, 2011).

Oregon Health Resources Commission. 1994. Medical Technology Assessment Program [MEDTAP]. (accessed August 1, 2011).

______. 2006. Medical Technology Assessment Program [MEDTAP]: Adopted by the Health Resources Commission on 2-17-06. (accessed August 1, 2011).

Sabik, L., and R. Lie. 2008. Priority setting in health care: Lessons from the experiences of eight countries. International Journal for Equity in Health Research 7(4):1-13.

State of Oklahoma. 2009. Oklahoma strategic plan: Oklahoma state coverage initiative. (accessed July 11, 2011).

Washington State Health Care Authority. 2007a. Health technology selection process. (accessed August 1, 2011).

______. 2007b. Prioritization criteria. (accessed August 1, 2011).

______. 2007c. Washington health technology assessment program (overview). (accessed August 1, 2011).

______. 2008. Health technology assessment: Program review. (accessed August 1, 2011).

Wynia, M. K., and A. P. Schwab. 2006. Ensuring fairness in health care coverage decisions. New York: AMACOM.

The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement