Ginsburg, M., and K. Glasmire. 2004. Making tough choices: Adults with disabilities prioritize their Medi-Cal options. http://www.chcd.org/docs/MediCalCHAT.pdf (accessed July 8, 2011).

______. 2007. Designing coverage: Uninsured Californians weigh the options. http://www.chcf.org/~/media/Files/PDF/D/PDF%20DesignCoverageForUninsured.pdf (accessed July 8, 2011).

Ginsburg, M., S. D. Goold, and M. Danis. 2006. (De)constructing basic benefits: Citizens define the limits of coverage. Health Affairs 25(6):1648-1655.

Gold, M. R., P. Franks, T. Siegelberg, and S. Sofaer. 2007. Does providing cost-effectiveness information change coverage priorities for citizens acting as social decision makers? Health Policy 83(1):65-72.

Goold, S. D., A. K. Biddle, H. Klipp, C. Hall, and M. Danis. 2005. Choosing Healthplans All Together: A deliberative exercise for allocating limited health care resources. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 30(4):563-601.

HHS (Department of Health and Human Services). 2010. Charter: Medicare Evidence Development & Coverage Advisory Committee. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Hirschman, A. O. 1970. Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

ISPOR (International Society for Pharmacoeonomics and Outcomes Research). 2011. ISPOR global health care systems road map: United States—health policy decision process. http://www.ispor.org/HTARoadMaps/USHP.asp (accessed August 1, 2011).

McCoy, M. L., and P. L. Scully. 2002. Deliberative dialogue to expand civic engagement: What kind of talk does democracy need? http://www.ncl.org/publications/ncr/91-2/ncr91-2_article.pdf (accessed July 8, 2011).

Menon, D., and T. Stafinski. 2011. Role of patient and public participation in health technology assessment and coverage decisions. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research 11(1):75-89.

Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and The Allina Foundation. 2001. Minnesota employees’ health care spending priorities: The CHAT project [unpublished]. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Chamber of Commerce.

NIH (National Institutes of Health). 2011. Engaging the public in priority setting for health. http://www.bioethics.nih.gov/research/pubeng/ (accessed July 11, 2011).

North Dakota Insurance Department. 2011. About us: CHAT. http://www.nd.gov/ndins/about/chat/ (accessed July 11, 2011).

NRC (National Research Council). 1996. Understanding risk: Informing decisions in a democratic society. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Ohio Department of Insurance. 2009. Ohio CHATs about healthcare: Voices of the uninsured. http://www.insurance.ohio.gov/Legal/Reports/Documents/CHATreport.pdf (accessed July 11, 2011).

Oregon Health Resources Commission. 1994. Medical Technology Assessment Program [MEDTAP]. http://www.oregon.gov/OHA/OHPR/HRC/docs/HRC.Reports/MEDTAP_09_accepted.pdf?ga=t (accessed August 1, 2011).

______. 2006. Medical Technology Assessment Program [MEDTAP]: Adopted by the Health Resources Commission on 2-17-06. http://www.oregon.gov/OHA/OHPR/HRC/docs/Policy/MedTapPolicy.pdf?ga=t (accessed August 1, 2011).

Sabik, L., and R. Lie. 2008. Priority setting in health care: Lessons from the experiences of eight countries. International Journal for Equity in Health Research 7(4):1-13.

State of Oklahoma. 2009. Oklahoma strategic plan: Oklahoma state coverage initiative. http://www.ok.gov/oid/documents/July14-2009-SCI-Final.pdf (accessed July 11, 2011).

Washington State Health Care Authority. 2007a. Health technology selection process. http://www.hta.hca.wa.gov/documents/selection_process.pdf (accessed August 1, 2011).

______. 2007b. Prioritization criteria. http://www.hta.hca.wa.gov/documents/prioritization_criteria.pdf (accessed August 1, 2011).

______. 2007c. Washington health technology assessment program (overview). http://www.hta.hca.wa.gov/documents/hta_overview.pdf (accessed August 1, 2011).

______. 2008. Health technology assessment: Program review. http://www.hta.hca.wa.gov/documents/program_review.pdf (accessed August 1, 2011).

Wynia, M. K., and A. P. Schwab. 2006. Ensuring fairness in health care coverage decisions. New York: AMACOM.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement