
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page R1
Facing the Reality of Drug-
Resistant Tuberculosis in India
Challenges and Potential Solutions
SUMMARY OF A JOINT WORKSHOP
by the Institute of Medicine,
the Indian National Science Academy, and
the Indian Council of Medical Research
Steve Olson, Rebecca A. English, Rita S. Guenther, and
Anne B. Claiborne, Rapporteurs
Forum on Drug Discovery, Development, and Translation
Board on Health Sciences Policy
OCR for page R1
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001
NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Govern-
ing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the
councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineer-
ing, and the Institute of Medicine.
This study was supported by contracts between the National Academy of Sciences
and Department of Health and Human Services (Contract Nos. N01-OD-4-2139
and 223001003T), U.S. State Department (S-LMAQM-08-GR-071), American
Society for Microbiology, Amgen Inc., Association of American Medical Colleges,
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Burroughs Wellcome Fund, Celtic Therapeutics, LLLP, Criti-
cal Path Institute, Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, Eli Lilly & Co., FasterCures,
Foundation for the NIH, Friends of Cancer Research, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson
& Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, and Pfizer
Inc. The views presented in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of
the organizations or agencies that provided support for the project.
International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-21966-2
International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-21966-3
Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press,
500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202)
334-3313; http://www.nap.edu.
For more information about the Institute of Medicine, visit the IOM home page
at: www.iom.edu.
Copyright 2012 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America
The serpent has been a symbol of long life, healing, and knowledge among almost
all cultures and religions since the beginning of recorded history. The serpent
adopted as a logotype by the Institute of Medicine is a relief carving from ancient
Greece, now held by the Staatliche Museen in Berlin.
Suggested citation: IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2012. Facing the Reality of Drug-
Resistant Tuberculosis in India: Challenges and Potential Solutions: Summary of a
Joint Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
OCR for page R1
“Knowing is not enough; we must apply.
Willing is not enough; we must do.”
— Goethe
Advising the Nation. Improving Health.
OCR for page R1
The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society
of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to
the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare.
Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Acad-
emy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific
and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy
of Sciences.
The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter
of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding
engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members,
sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the
federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineer-
ing programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research,
and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Charles M. Vest is presi-
dent of the National Academy of Engineering.
The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of
Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in
the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Insti-
tute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its
congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own
initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V.
Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine.
The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sci-
ences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the
Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government.
Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the
Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy
of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the
government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Coun-
cil is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr.
Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. Charles M. Vest are chair and vice chair, respectively, of
the National Research Council.
www.national-academies.org
OCR for page R1
PLANNING COMMITTEE ON FACING THE REALITY
OF DRUG-RESISTANT TUBERCULOSIS IN INDIA:
CHALLENGES AND POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS1
GAIL H. CASSELL (Chair), Harvard Medical School (visiting)
BARRY R. BLOOM, Harvard School of Public Health
ENRIQUETA C. BOND, QE Philanthropic Advisors
RICHARD E. CHAISSON, Johns Hopkins University
PAUL E. FARMER, Partners In Health, Harvard Medical School
ANTHONY S. FAUCI, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases
GARY L. FILERMAN, Atlas Health Foundation
GERALD H. FRIEDLAND, Yale University School of Medicine
ELAINE K. GALLIN, QE Philanthropic Advisors
STEPHEN GROFT, National Center for Advancing Translational
Sciences
NANCY SUNG, Burroughs Wellcome Fund
IOM Staff
ANNE B. CLAIBORNE, Forum Director
RITA S. GUENTHER, Program Officer
REBECCA A. ENGLISH, Associate Program Officer
ELIZABETH F. C. TYSON, Research Associate
ANDREW M. POPE, Director, Board on Health Sciences Policy
ROBIN GUYSE, Senior Program Assistant
RONA BRIERE, Consulting Editor
Indian National Science Academy (INSA) Staff
KRISHAN LAL, President
PRAKASH N. TANDON, Past President
A. K. JAIN, Inter Academy Officer
1 Institute of Medicine planning committees are solely responsible for organizing the work-
shop, identifying topics, and choosing speakers. The responsibility for the published workshop
summary rests with the workshop rapporteurs and the institution.
v
OCR for page R1
Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) Staff
VISHWA MOHAN KATOCH, Director General
LALIT KANT, Head, Division of Epidemiology and Communicable
Diseases
MANJULA SINGH, Scientist C
HARPREET SANDHU, Scientist D
MUKESH KUMAR, Scientist E and Head
vi
OCR for page R1
FORUM ON DRUG DISCOVERY,
DEVELOPMENT, AND TRANSLATION1
JEFFREY M. DRAZEN (Co-Chair), New England Journal of Medicine,
Boston, Massachusetts
STEVEN K. GALSON (Co-Chair), Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks,
California
MARGARET ANDERSON, FasterCures, Washington, DC
HUGH AUCHINCLOSS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
LESLIE Z. BENET, University of California, San Francisco
ANN BONHAM, Association of American Medical Colleges,
Washington, DC
LINDA BRADY, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda,
Maryland
ROBERT CALIFF, Duke University Medical Center, Durham,
North Carolina
C. THOMAS CASKEY, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
GAIL H. CASSELL, Harvard Medical School (visiting), Carmel, Indiana
PETER B. CORR, Celtic Therapeutics, LLLP, New York, New York
ANDREW M. DAHLEM, Eli Lilly & Co., Indianapolis, Indiana
TAMARA DARSOW, American Diabetes Association, Alexandria,
Virginia
JAMES H. DOROSHOW, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
GARY L. FILERMAN, Atlas Health Foundation, McLean, Virginia
GARRET A. FITZGERALD, University of Pennsylvania School of
Medicine, Philadelphia
MARK J. GOLDBERGER, Abbott Pharmaceuticals, Rockville, Maryland
HARRY B. GREENBERG, Stanford University School of Medicine,
California
STEPHEN GROFT, National Center for Advancing Translational
Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
LYNN HUDSON, Critical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona
THOMAS INSEL, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences,
Bethesda, Maryland
MICHAEL KATZ, March of Dimes Foundation, White Plains, New York
PETRA KAUFMANN, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and
Stroke, Bethesda, Maryland
1 Institute of Medicine forums and roundtables do not issue, review, or approve individual
documents. The responsibility for the published workshop summary rests with the workshop
rapporteurs and the institution.
vii
OCR for page R1
JACK D. KEENE, Duke University Medical Center, Durham,
North Carolina
RONALD L. KRALL, University of Pennsylvania, Center for Bioethics,
Steamboat Springs, Colorado
FREDA LEWIS-HALL, Pfizer Inc., New York, New York
MARK B. McCLELLAN, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
CAROL MIMURA, University of California, Berkeley
ELIZABETH (BETSY) MYERS, Doris Duke Charitable Foundation,
New York, New York
JOHN ORLOFF, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover,
New Jersey
AMY PATTERSON, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
MICHAEL ROSENBLATT, Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station,
New Jersey
JANET SHOEMAKER, American Society for Microbiology,
Washington, DC
ELLEN SIGAL, Friends of Cancer Research, Washington, DC
ELLIOTT SIGAL, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey
ELLEN R. STRAHLMAN, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina
NANCY SUNG, Burroughs Wellcome Fund, Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina
JANET TOBIAS, Ikana Media and Mount Sinai School of Medicine,
New York, New York
JOANNE WALDSTREICHER, Janssen Research & Development, LLC,
Raritan, New Jersey
JANET WOODCOCK, Food and Drug Administration, White Oak,
Maryland
IOM Staff
ANNE B. CLAIBORNE, Forum Director
RITA S. GUENTHER, Program Officer
REBECCA A. ENGLISH, Associate Program Officer
ELIZABETH F. C. TYSON, Research Associate
ANDREW M. POPE, Director, Board on Health Sciences Policy
ROBIN GUYSE, Senior Program Assistant
viii
OCR for page R1
Reviewers
This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen
for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with
procedures approved by the National Research Council’s Report Review
Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid
and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published
report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional
standards for clarity, objectivity and responsiveness to the charge. The
review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the
integrity of the process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their
review of this report:
Digambar Behera, Lala Ram Sarup Institute of TB and Respiratory
Diseases
Vishwa Mohan Katoch, Indian Council of Medical Research
P. R. Narayanan, National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis,
Chennai
K. Srinath Reddy, Public Health Foundation of India
Christine F. Sizemore, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases
Soumya Swaminathan, National Institute for Research in
Tuberculosis, Chennai
Prakash N. Tandon, Indian National Science Academy
Kristina Wallengren, KwaZulu-Natal Research Institute for
Tuberculosis and HIV, Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine,
University of KwaZulu-Natal
ix
OCR for page R1
x REVIEWERS
Although the reviewers listed above provided many constructive com-
ments and suggestions, they did not see the final draft of the report before
its release. The review of this report was overseen by Melvin Worth.
Appointed by the Institute of Medicine, he was responsible for making
certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in
accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments
were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report
rests entirely with the authors and the institution.
OCR for page R1
Contents
ACRONYMS xvii
1 INTRODUCTION 1
History and Dimensions of the Problem, 6
The Burden of Drug-Resistant TB, 7
Treating TB in Context, 8
Overview of TB and MDR TB in India, 10
Setting the Stage, 14
Organization of the Report, 16
2 DRUG-RESISTANT TB IN INDIA 17
The Burden of TB and MDR TB in India, 18
Plans of the Revised National TB Control Program, 20
Involvement of the Private Sector, 27
Challenges to the Revised National TB Control Program, 28
Treatment of Drug-Resistant TB, 30
Improving Health System Performance to Address the
Challenge of Drug-Resistant TB, 33
Potential Innovations and Action Items, 35
3 THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DRUG-RESISTANT TB 37
Overview of the Global Burden of TB and MDR TB, 38
MDR TB Prevention and Control in China, 40
Historical Perspective on TB and MDR TB Control Efforts, 41
xi
OCR for page R1
xii CONTENTS
Global Challenges and Potential Solutions, 43
Potential Innovations and Action Items, 46
4 PREVENTING TRANSMISSION OF DRUG-RESISTANT TB 49
India’s Program Efforts to Prevent Transmission of
Drug-Resistant TB, 50
The Impact of Treatment on MDR TB Transmission, 52
The Genetic Evolution of M.tb., 54
The Molecular Epidemiology of M.tb., 56
Potential Innovations and Action Items, 57
5 DETECTING DRUG RESISTANCE AND STRENGTHENING
LABORATORY CAPACITY 59
Diagnosis of Drug-Resistant TB, 60
Quality Assurance Considerations in the Development of
New Diagnostics, 63
The Supranational Reference Laboratory Network, 64
Expanding Laboratory Capacity in India for the Diagnosis of
Drug-Resistant TB, 67
Potential Innovations and Action Items, 69
6 ADDRESSING TB AND DRUG-RESISTANT TB IN
VULNERABLE POPULATIONS 71
Drug-Resistant TB in Pediatric Populations, 72
The Burden of Pediatric TB in Households of Patients with
MDR TB, 75
Drug Resistance in HIV-Infected Populations, 78
Drug-Resistant TB in Migrant and Refugee Populations, 80
Case Studies in Cambodia and Ethiopia, 84
Potential Innovations and Action Items, 88
7 COMBATING DRUG-RESISTANT TB THROUGH
PUBLIC–PRIVATE COLLABORATION AND INNOVATIVE
APPROACHES 89
Operation ASHA: “Going the Last Mile,” 90
Engaging the Private Sector in India, 93
Technological Innovations in TB Control, 95
Potential Innovations and Action Items, 98
OCR for page R1
xiii
CONTENTS
8 CONFRONTING CHALLENGES TO THE SUPPLY CHAIN FOR
SECOND-LINE DRUGS 99
Challenges in Drug Supply Chain Logistics, 100
India’s Second-Line Drug Supply Chain, 103
Improving the Availability and Reducing the Cost of
MDR TB Drugs, 107
Moving Toward a Functional Market for Second-Line
TB Drugs, 108
Discussion, 110
Potential Innovations and Action Items, 111
9 CREATING A BLUEPRINT FOR ACTION 113
Drug-Resistant TB in India, 113
Preventing Transmission of Drug-Resistant TB, 114
Strengthening Laboratory Capacity, 115
Addressing TB and Drug-Resistant TB in Vulnerable
Populations, 116
Combating Drug-Resistant TB Through Public–Private
Collaboration and Innovative Approaches, 117
Strengthening the Second-Line Drug Supply Chain, 119
REFERENCES 121
APPENDIXES
A Workshop Agenda 129
B Summary of a Joint Meeting of the National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of
Health, and Indian Biomedical Research Agencies,
Held April 20-21, 2011, New Delhi, India 141
C Participant Biographies 145
OCR for page R1
OCR for page R1
Tables, Figures, and Boxes
TABLES
2-1 Drug Resistance Surveillance in Three Indian States, 20
3-1 Estimated Versus Reported MDR TB Cases in 2009, 39
3-2 Reduced Prices of Second-Line TB Drugs (1997–2000), 44
3-3 Prices for Green Light Committee-Approved Drugs, 45
6-1 Profile of XDR TB in India, 81
FIGURES
1-1 Of the estimated 5 million MDR TB cases that occurred between
2000 and 2009, only 0.5 percent were treated in programs approved
by the Green Light Committee, 15
2-1 India has the highest TB burden of any country in the world, 19
2-2 Distribution of Revised National TB Control Program (RNTCP) cul-
ture and drug susceptibility testing (DST) laboratories across India
as of March 2011, 25
6-1 TB incidence rates are highest in young adults in the African and
Southeast Asian regions, 73
xv
OCR for page R1
xvi TABLES, FIGURES, AND BOXES
6-2 The TB epidemic in India is being driven primarily by the approxi-
mately 400 million people infected with TB who are not coinfected
with HIV, 82
7-1 The DOTS model in India includes a network of three types of facili-
ties: TB hospitals, diagnostic centers, and treatment centers, 91
7-2 A map of part of Karachi pinpoints TB patients (small figures), pri-
vate health care providers (small red squares), and hospitals (boxes
containing a capital H), 96
8-1 A schematic of the typical drug supply chain structure, which may
not hold for all countries, 101
8-2 The Revised National TB Control Program (RNTCP) goals for
MDR TB diagnosis call for increasing the number of sputum-positive
retreatment patients to be tested and treated in future years, 104
8-3 Second-line drugs move from state drug stores to DOTS-Plus provid-
ers through a series of steps, 105
BOXES
1-1 Key Viewpoints from Previous Workshops, 2
1-2 The Nature of the Threat, 8
OCR for page R1
Acronyms
AIDS acquired immune deficiency syndrome
AIIMS All India Institute of Medical Sciences
API active pharmaceutical ingredient
CAS Central Asian
CDC U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CHW community health worker
CPC cetyl-pyridinium chloride
CRI colorimetric redox indicator
DOT directly observed treatment
DOTS Directly Observed Treatment-Short course
DST drug susceptibility testing
EAI East African-Indian
EXPAND-TB Expanding Access to New Diagnostics for TB
FIND Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics
GDF Global Drug Facility
GLC Green Light Committee
GLI Global Laboratory Initiative
GMP Good Manufacturing Practice
GP general practitioner
xvii
OCR for page R1
xviii ACRONYMS
HIV human immunodeficiency virus
ICMR Indian Council of Medical Research
INSA Indian National Science Academy
IOM Institute of Medicine
IRD Interactive Research and Development
IRIS immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome
ISO International Organisation for Standardization
IUATLD International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung
Disease (“the Union”)
K-RITH KwaZulu-Natal Research Institute for Tuberculosis and
HIV
LAM lipoarabinomannan
LED light-emitting diode
LMIS logistics management information systems
LPA line probe assay
LRS Lala Ram Sarup
MDR TB multidrug-resistant tuberculosis
MGIT mycobacteria growth indicator tube
MIRU mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units
MODS microscopic observation drug susceptibility
M.tb. Mycobacterium tuberculosis
NAAT nucleic acid amplification testing
NGO nongovernmental organization
NIAID National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
NIH National Institutes of Health
NRA nitrate reductase assay
PAS P-aminosalicylic acid
PCR polymerase chain reaction
PEPFAR U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief
PETTS Preserving Effective TB Treatment Study
PKR Pakistan rupees
PPM public–private mix
RCC Rolling Continuation Channel
RNTCP Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program
SSCP single-strand conformational polymorphism
OCR for page R1
xix
ACRONYMS
TB tuberculosis
TDR TB totally drug-resistant tuberculosis
TLA thin layer agar
Tuberculosis Research Centre (India)1
TRC
TST tuberculin skin test
USAID U.S. Agency for International Development
VNTR variable number of tandem repeats
WHO World Health Organization
XDR TB extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis
1 Since the workshop, the Tuberculosis Research Centre (TRC) in Chennai, India, was
renamed the National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis.
OCR for page R1