|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 11
3
The Research Program
The Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology continues to address the challenge of
actively managing the balance between high-quality science and service. The first can lead to
the second, but only if time is allowed for the sufficient maturation of the research. The current
balance is appropriate but needs to be monitored very closely if it is to be preserved.
ELECTRON PHYSICS GROUP
Scope and Mission
The Electron Physics Group (EPG) conducts a wide range of cross-disciplinary research
that focuses on developing innovative measurement capabilities for nanotechnology, with an
emphasis on applications for future electronics. The EPG is the most established group within
the CNST, having been a part of NIST since 1954. A number of the project leaders are among
the founding members of the center. EPG research encompasses scanning-probe microscopy;
nanomagnetic imaging and dynamics; theory, modeling, and simulation; and laser manipulation
of atoms. The research conducted by the group is uniformly of a very high standard, and the
capabilities in terms of the measurement tools and methods that the EPG is developing are
impressive.
Staffing
The EPG consists of 20 scientific staff (5 project leaders, 11 postdoctoral researchers, and
4 visitors) in addition to 7 support staff (2 in electronics, 2 in instrumentation, and 3 in
information technology). Although the support staff are attached to the EPG, they provide
support for all of the CNST research groups. The EPG is well established, with senior staff
having been in place for some time. The integration of postdoctoral researchers into projects is
smooth, and there appears to be collaboration and communication across research areas and
across groups. The input of the support staff is very important to these efforts, given the fact that
much of the equipment is home-built. Staffing is adequate and is uniform across areas.
Quality of Research and Facilities
The scanning-probe microscopy is extremely strong and clearly a world-leading area. The
instrumentation is unique in its capability, with the newest instrument combining a scanning
tunneling microscope (STM) with high-energy resolution, cryogenic temperatures (10 mK), and
high magnetic fields (15 T), and a range of ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) sample-preparation
chambers. The quality of the research and the degree of collaboration with both internal and
external researchers are excellent. The work on graphene addresses scientific issues that
probably could not be addressed anywhere else. The emphasis on understanding changes to
graphene that occur on its incorporation into device structures is critical. The EPG is very widely
recognized and is a highlight of the CNST. The extension of scanning-probe microscope (SPM)
11
OCR for page 12
spin-electronics measurements to topological insulators promises to be very fruitful as well. The
integration of experiments with theory is also noteworthy.
Three project leaders perform research that addresses nanomagnetism, including the
following areas: (1) imaging using scanning electron microscopy with polarization analysis
(SEMPA), (2) techniques to measure and quantify spin-wave modes, (3) the development of
novel electron beams that carry orbital angular momentum (OAM), (4) the development of
magnetic resonance force microscopy (MRFM), and (5) theory and modeling. The EPG has a
strong presence within the nanomagnetics community, and its research, both experimental and
theoretical, is highly regarded. The project leaders are continuing to develop new measurement
tools that enhance their existing capabilities—for example, extension of SEMPA to analyze
ultrathin magnetic multilayers by means of profiling using very-low-energy ion beams. The
initiation of a program on transmission electron microscopy (TEM) beams with OAM opens up
possible new applications and is to be encouraged.
The experimental effort in the area of laser manipulation of atoms is superb. It is leading
to an entirely new method of producing focused-ion beams through laser trapping of metallic
atoms using a magneto-optical trap ion source (MOTIS). This method may enable focused-ion-
beam (FIB) systems with a broader range of choices of source ion than is available in
commercial systems. The ability to choose the source ion enables the optimization of the ion for
the appropriate application: for example, for imaging, etching, pattern definition, beam
chemistry, or materials analysis. The MOTIS also improves the energy resolution of the FIB
instrument. The EPG interacts with industrial partners such as the FEI Company, a leading
manufacturer of commercial FIB systems, through CRADAs and has patented aspects of the
method.
Alignment with Mission
Research and development work in the EPG ranges from very fundamental work to
applications with foreseeable technological or commercial applications. The EPG is involved in
a wide range of interactions with collaborators from industry, academia, and national
laboratories. Most of its collaborators are U.S.-based, although it is engaged in some
international academic collaborations. NIST is a contributing member of the Nanoelectronics
Research Initiative (NRI) funded by the Semiconductor Research Corporation (SRC). This
involvement has led to 12 academic collaborations. Collaborators are helping the EPG to develop
new measurement tools and also are acting as “users” of existing tools. The group’s industrial
collaborators are somewhat fewer, although a strong interaction exists between the ion-beam
development project and FEI Company. The new technique developed for measuring spin
polarization by means of analysis of Doppler-shifted spin waves involves collaboration with
Hitachi Global Storage Technology. Project leaders in the nanomagnetics area commented to the
panel that collaborations with the magnetic-storage industry are becoming harder to set up. The
difficulty is in part a result of the decline of that industry in general. The theory and modeling
part of the program has strong interactions with academic collaborators and with other members
of the EPG. These interactions are very appropriate and critical to the success of the EPG. In
summary, all efforts of the EPG seem highly aligned with the overall mission of NIST in terms
of measurement and the development of new methods.
12
OCR for page 13
Future Plans
The EPG has historically done very well in progressing from one exciting project to
another. Well-positioned near-term ideas are apparent in a number of areas. Given the overall
service mission of the CNST and the expectation of a continually changing base of collaborators,
it may be difficult to develop plans beyond the short term. It will be helpful nevertheless for the
research staff to have a plan and to update it continually in order to prioritize the wide range of
high-impact activities and collaborations with which the group is becoming involved.
Evaluative Comments and Suggestions
Overall, the EPG is carrying out research that is cutting edge and of extremely high
quality. The project leaders and postdoctoral researchers display a high degree of enthusiasm and
commitment to their research, and there is clearly a positive work ethic. The presentations of the
group were generally well organized and clear, and the posters were well presented by
enthusiastic and knowledgeable postdoctoral researchers. Extensive written materials were
provided to the panel. As noted above, the research being carried out in the group ranges from
very fundamental to more applied, which is appropriate. A case in point is the research on
focused ion beams, initially a basic research program that has now evolved into a CRADA and
may result in a commercial product and a start-up company.
The CNST takes seriously its role in preparing postdoctoral associates for their next
position, and in general it does this very well. There may, however, be an opportunity for some
enhancements that would enable postdoctoral associates to acquire skills that would be needed
for non-academic careers. For example, training in entrepreneurship would be invaluable for
postdoctoral associates contemplating starting a company or joining a start-up. If it is not
possible to provide such training in-house, it may be possible to partner with neighboring
institutions or to provide release time and resources. It is, of course, imperative to continue to
make sure that postdoctoral associates, especially those who are more involved in service work
than in research, have the opportunity to attend meetings and produce publications.
The leader of the EPG identified the emerging requirement that measurements address
novel electronics beyond complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) electronics, and
provided a detailed list of potential devices for both memory and logic applications. The group
should consider addressing the measurement needs of a wider range of these systems beyond
magnetic materials and graphene. For example, technologies based on resistance change (both
phase-change materials and resistive-switching oxide materials) have been identified as likely
candidates for future applications, but they are attended by fundamental issues that would benefit
from exploration by the techniques available in the EPG.
NANOFABRICATION RESEARCH GROUP
Scope and Mission
The Nanofabrication Research Group (NRG) was formed in 2007. Its mission is to
advance the state of the art in nanofabrication and nanomanufacturing. The research programs
within the group cover a broad range, with a healthy mix of theory, modeling, and experiment.
Several research projects that definitely do advance the state of the art of nanofabrication are
outside the group—for example, the work on electron beams with angular momentum and that
on focused-ion-beam extraction from optical traps, which are within the Electron Physics Group.
13
OCR for page 14
This statement is not intended as a criticism but rather as an observation that technology
advancements can come from many quarters, and this should be encouraged. Nano-
manufacturing, an area of growing importance, has been added to the mission of the
Nanofabrication Research Group since the previous review.
Staffing
The Nanofabrication Research Group has added new staff members since the previous
review. It appears now to be appropriately staffed at the level of 8 project leaders, 14
postdoctoral associates, and 4 visiting fellows. The competence of the researchers was evident
from their presentations and from their discussions with panel members during the laboratory
visits.
Quality of Research and Facilities
The research programs within the Nanofabrication Research Group are of high quality.
Group competencies include the following: nanofabrication, nanoscale stochastics, single-
particle tracking, nanophotonics, nanoplasmonics, nanomechanics, nanotribology, in situ
transmission electron microscopy, and nanosystems control. The laboratory facilities available to
the group are among the best in the world. It is gratifying to see that such superb facilities are so
widely available for service, collaboration, and the dissemination of information.
Alignment with Mission
The alignment of the research programs of the NRG with its mission of advancing the
state of the art in nanofabrication is not uniformly obvious, although alignment with the overall
mission of NIST is, in general, good. The research on nano-optics is focused on sensing and
measurement. Although this effort is fully compatible with the NIST mission of measurement, it
is only indirectly related to advancing the state of the art of nanofabrication. The research on
nanomechanics covers both sensing and tribology. The former is fully compatible with the NIST
mission of measurement; the latter is more basic in nature but with the potential to impact
nanometrology significantly well into the future. The research on automated dual-beam
nanomanufacturing addresses a serious problem with FIB systems and is definitely in line with
the group’s stated mission of advancing nanofabrication. While awaiting the arrival of a new
TEM, research on environmental transmission electron microscopy (ETEM) is employing
instruments at the NanoFab, the NIST Materials Measurement Laboratory, and extramural
organizations. Questions were raised about the validity of measurements made in an ETEM, as
electron beams are well known to produce damage and could interfere with the phenomena being
observed. That said, ETEM provides a unique means of monitoring events such as catalysis in
real time, and the issue of intrinsic disturbance will be sorted out with further research. The in
situ Raman thermometry extends Raman analysis into the ultraviolet (UV) to evaluate more
materials and observe subtle phonon effects.
The work on nanomanufacturing is welcome and is fully compatible with NIST’s mission
of aiding U.S. industry. Much of the work in this area, especially the work on deconvolving
substrate-particle interactions and on the high-throughput near-field scanning optical microscope
(NSOM), is directly related to advancing the state of the art in nanomanufacturing. The
convergence of these nondestructive methods shows promise for enabling a more fundamental
understanding and control of buried nanoscopic structures, which is required for many
14
OCR for page 15
nanomanufacturing processes. Focus on this issue will ensure that U.S. industry has ample
opportunity to exploit innovations in nanoscale science and engineering. The plots of resolution
versus throughput and complexity versus cost/area identify key problems. It would be beneficial
if these plots could be further enhanced, clarified, and promulgated. The new emphasis on
nanomanufacturing in the NRG is well integrated with initiatives at other agencies, including the
National Science Foundation.
Future Plans
The NRG did not discuss future plans. The energy and youth of the staff and the intrinsic
quality of the research, however, predict future success. Overall, the research, collaboration, and
service of the Nanofabrication Research Group are exemplary. Now that the group is at full
staffing, the connection with and synergistic emphasis on nanofabrication technology are likely
to evolve significantly during the next review cycle.
Evaluative Comments and Suggestions
Research in the Nanofabrication Research Group is of high quality and well coupled to
the NIST and CNST missions. The project leaders, postdoctoral researchers, and visitors are
competent and enthusiastic. The presentations of the group were well organized and clear, but
the posters were not. Some of the poster presentations were difficult to understand and lacked
context or clarity of purpose or method. In the future, the review should have well-prepared
posters or should eliminate them altogether.
Given the critical importance of nanofabrication technology, a greater emphasis on
research directed toward improving the efficacy and flexibility of nanofabrication methods is
encouraged. This will require going beyond commercially available techniques, including those
developed for the semiconductor industry.
The Nanofabrication Research Group has hosted a number of workshops, which should
be continued as a means of getting the NIST message out to the academic and industrial
communities.
ENERGY RESEARCH GROUP
Scope and Mission
The scope and mission of the Energy Research Group (ERG) are characterized as
“developing measurement and fabrication methods relating nano-/atomic scale
morphology and structure to functional properties in energy-related materials and devices.”12
Staffing
The ERG is staffed appropriately with senior, junior, postdoctoral, and technical staff.
There are currently 6 project leaders and 7 postdoctoral researchers. The hiring of a theorist with
broad capabilities follows the recommendation made by the NRC review panel 2 years ago. The
theorist’s work provides a needed intellectual coherence within the group. The prospects for
12
Nikolai Zhitenev, CNST/ERG, “The Energy Research Group,” presentation to the panel, Gaithersburg,
Maryland, March 7, 2011.
15
OCR for page 16
achievements resulting from the hiring of a physical electrochemist (consistent with another
recommendation of the previous panel) with interests and a research style that fit well into the
physics-oriented effort in the group are promising. The addition of a senior staff member to work
on thermoelectric materials is a bold move designed to couple to industrial interests in this area.
The group has also added a very strong senior researcher in nanotechnology and applications in
energy. At this point, the Energy Research Group is relatively new, still growing, and coalescing
as a unit.
Quality of Research and Facilities
The scope of ERG research is meant for the development of new measurements relating
nano- and atomic-scale morphology and structure to functional properties addressing three areas:
energy generation, energy conversion and storage, and energy efficiency. Five project areas are
active: photovoltaics (PV), solar thermal energy, solar fuels, thermoelectrics, and batteries.
The three core areas of measurement expertise are the following: (1) the theory and
modeling of nanomaterials for renewable energy (calculations of electric, thermal, and ionic
transport for materials and nanostructures used in energy-relevant applications, such as
photovoltaics and thermoelectrics); (2) vibrational spectroscopy and microscopy (development
and application of new spectroscopic methods, including infrared imaging with nanoscale spatial
resolution, for characterizing nanomaterials with infrared and Raman spectroscopy); and (3)
nanomaterials for solar fuels and artificial photosynthesis (methods to correlate structure and
performance of nanocatalysts for solar fuels, and biotemplated approaches to artificial
photosynthesis and nanofabrication).
Examples of current research topics include the following: developing an understanding
of structure/function correlations of photoanodes for water splitting, the in situ characterization
of lithium-ion batteries, electrochemical measurements using surface plasmons, the fabrication
and characterization of field emission sources based on arrays of 1D structures for x-ray sources,
photothermal infrared absorption spectroscopy of condensed materials using atomic force
microscope (AFM) detection, the development and characterization of nanostructured
thermoelectronic materials, and nanoscale studies of charge transport in organic photovoltaic
devices.
The connection of this work to fundamental problems in physics, chemistry, and
materials science is less clear than the connection to technological issues. For example, the
selection of field emission arrays for investigation hardly addresses fundamental issues or
recognizes the basic contributions to this field made at NIST in previous decades by the Electron
Physics Group. The study of charge transport at nanoscale in organic photoelectric devices
hardly recognizes the fundamentals of charge transport along molecules as currently achieved
theoretically in fields such as molecular electronics and protein conduction.
Despite being a relatively new group, the ERG has established projects to address a
number of issues in the energy area. The quality of the research varies widely throughout the
group. It was not clear to the panel whether many of the selected areas of energy-related research
address the most critical problems of measurement in energy science. Certainly the investigation
of field emission arrays, for example, cannot be connected to a major need in the energy field.
The group should seriously consider the most important opportunities on the energy landscape in
problem selection.
The new laboratories, many of which are still under development, and new equipment are
first rate in all respects. Most of the new equipment is commercial or modified-commercial. As
the group continues to mature, it should aspire to the design and fabrication of some
16
OCR for page 17
noncommercial equipment to address the frontier of nanoscale measurements connected to
energy.
Alignment with Mission
The alignment of the Energy Research Group’s research program with the stated scope
and mission of the ERG is appropriate.
Future Plans
The Energy Research Group has some good ideas and views with respect to its future
research. However, long-range strategic planning for the group was not apparent and needs to be
discussed more explicitly during the next review.
Evaluative Comments and Suggestions
The ERG is still very young. It is too early to judge the quality of the staff with accuracy,
and it is even somewhat difficult to gauge the alignment of the work with the mission of the
group and the mission of the CNST, as many laboratories are still under development. Over the
next 2 years, the group needs to establish greater coherence, accompanied by the development of
a stronger connection between nanoscale measurements and important problems in energy.
The Energy Research Group is still in the process of growth and stabilization. Following
are suggestions for the ERG as it moves forward:
Over the next 2 years, it should establish greater coherence, accompanied by the
development of a stronger connection between nanoscale measurements and
important problems in energy.
Although the new laboratories are outstanding, most of the equipment is commercial
or modified-commercial. As the group continues to mature, it should aspire to the
design and fabrication of some noncommercial equipment to address the frontier of
nanoscale measurements connected to energy.
Long-range strategic planning for the group was not apparent and needs to be
discussed more explicitly during the next review.
The CNST should continue the effort to mature the focus and stature of the newer
research groups, especially the Energy Research Group. This effort would include more
strategic planning and the identification of research issues of central importance to the energy
landscape in the United States.
17
