Quality Criteria and Dimensions

For each criterion provide one rating using the scale below:

poor   Good   Excellent

1   2   3   4   5   6   7

Criteria and Dimensions Score
Technical Quality of Output
• Applying standards of science and technology
•Appropriate methodology (quantitative or qualitative design and statistics)
• Accessibility, usability, etc.

Score Rationale:
Advancement of Knowledge or the Field (research, practice, or policy as relevant)
• Science. Establishment of methods, tools, theory
•Ken information
•Closing an identified gap
•New technology
•Innovative or novel

Score Rationale:
Likely or Demonstrated Impact On:
• Science (impact factor, citations)
• Consumers (people with disabilities: health, quality of life, participation)
•Provider practice
• Health and social system
• Social and health policy
• Private sector commercialization
• Other

Score Rationale:
•Identification and tailoring of materials for reaching different audience user types
•Collaboration with audience users in identifying content and medium needs-preferences
•Delivery of information through multiple media types and sources foi optimal reach and accessibility
•Evaluation of dissemination efforts and impacts
•Commercialization patenting of devices, if applicable

Score Rationale:
Overall Score

Score Rationale:

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001

Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement