ation that the higher productivity of these vehicles can also be used to justify the implementation of additional safety technologies.

Recommendation 9-6. The DOT and DOE, in discussion with the Congress, should consider the recommendations of the Transportation Research Board regarding the establishment of a Commercial Traffic Effects Institute or a similar approach.

Finding 9-10. The DOE-DOT draft white paper on efficient operations in its current form does not include any goals that could be used to prioritize and drive R&D efforts on efficient operations.

Recommendation 9-7. Specific goals for efficient operations should be developed, with strong consideration given to exploiting the potential for intelligent transportation systems to reduce fuel consumption. In addition, priorities should be set for the R&D, testing, and data collection needed to analyze the benefits, drawbacks, and potential unintended consequences of removing barriers, including regulatory barriers, to the application of fuel-saving features. The draft white paper on efficient operations should be rewritten to take the findings and recommendations of the committee into account. The 21CTP partners, trucking fleets, and major suppliers should be involved in setting goals and research priorities.

Finding 9-11. There is a need for a more detailed evaluation of the large potential for fuel savings from efficient operations than is provided in the existing DOE-DOT draft white paper of February 25, 2011. This more detailed study can be used to set goals, targets, and timetables for fuel savings from efficient operations.

Recommendation 9-8. The DOE and DOT should study the potential fuel savings from efficient operations in more detail, including a review of cost-effectiveness and ease of implementation. Once this information is available, goals, targets, and timetables for fuel savings from efficient operations should be established. Programs should then be developed and implemented to realize the available fuel savings.


ATRI (American Transportation Research Institute). 2008. Energy and Emissions Impact of Operating Higher Productivity Vehicles. Revised Edition. American Transportation Research Institute.

CSC (Canada Safety Council). 2003. Literature Review of the Safety of Long Combination Vehicles and Their Operation in Canada. Available at Accessed May 18, 2011.

Die Zeit. 2010. Die Giga-Brummis. Die Zeit Newspaper (Germany), No. 43, October 21, 2010, pp. 39-40.

DOE-DOT (Department of Energy and Department of Transportation). 2011. Reducing Fuel Consumption in U.S. Trucking—A DOE-DOT Joint Study and White Paper. 21st Century Truck Partnership Efficient Operations White Paper. Draft. February 15. Washington, D.C.

FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2010. Federal Size Regulations for Commercial Motor Vehicles. FHWA-MC-96-03.

FMCSA (Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration). 2005. Motor Carrier Safety Progress Report. Available at Accessed September 23, 2011.

McCormick, C. 2009. Proof Positive. Motortruck. September-October.

NETL (National Energy Technology Laboratory). 2007. Test, Evaluation, and Demonstration of Practical Devices/Systems to Reduce Aerodynamic Drag of Tractor/Semitrailer Combination Unit Trucks. Prepared for NETL by the Truck Manufacturers Association, Contract DE-FC26-04NT42117. April. Washington, D.C.

NRC (National Research Council). 2010. Technologies and Approaches to Reducing the Fuel Consumption of Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2011. Moving Freight with Better Trucks: Improving Safety, Productivity and Sustainability (Summary). Paris: International Transport Forum. Available at

Regehr, J., J. Montufar, and G. Rempel. 2009. Safety Performance of Longer Combination Vehicles Relative to Other Articulated Trucks. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 36:40-49. Available at

TRB (Transportation Research Board). 2002. Regulation of Weights, Lengths and Widths of Commercial Motor Vehicles. Special Report 267. Washington, D.C.

Walmart. 2010. Walmart 2010 Sustainability Report. Available at Accessed April 10, 2011.

The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement