National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$49.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Review of the 21st Century Truck Partnership, Second Report (2012)
Board on Energy and Environmental Systems (BEES)

Citation Manager

Committee to Review the 21st Century Truck Partnership, Phase 2, National Research Council. "Appendix G: History of Heavy-Duty Truck Aerodynamic and Tire Rolling Resistance Coefficients." Review of the 21st Century Truck Partnership, Second Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
170
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Review of the 21st Century Truck Partnership, Second Report

TABLE G-1 History of Heavy-Duty Truck Aerodynamic and Tire Rolling Resistance Coefficients


    Crr
Truck Configuration Description Cd Steer Drive Trailer Weighted Averagea

1974 COE T-Tb 1.02       0.0103c
1974 COE T-T, Closed Gap, Trailer Skirts,
Boat-Tailb
0.46        
EPA Classic Conventional, Exterior Air Cleaners,
Verticle Exhaust, Flat Bumber, No Aero Features T-T
0.77        
EPA GHG Rule (CE-CERT) 2000’s Conventional
High Roof T-T
0.74        
EPA GHG Rule Conventional High-Roof
Average T-T
0.69 0.0078 0.0082 0.0072d 0.0077
NRC 21CTP, Phase 2, Mid-2000s Conventional
High Roof, pre-S/W T-Te
0.63       0.0068
EPA GHG Rule Conventional High-Roof
SmartWay T-T
0.59 0.0059 0.0074 0.0053 0.0063
EPA GHG Rule Conventional High-Roof Advanced
SmartWay T-T
0.55       0.0055
NRC 21CTP Review, Phase 2, Conventional High Roof,
2015-2020 T-T
0.45       0.0045

NOTE: COE T-T: Cab Over Engine Tractor-Trailer. T-T: Tractor-Trailer. The Cds’ and the Crrs’ in the table are not derived from a consistent set of measurement or test procedures.

a Weightings: Steer (12), Drive (34), Trailer (34) reflect distribution of (80,000) lb Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW).

b K.R. Cooper, Commercial Vehicle Aerodynamic Drag Reduction: Historical Perspective as a Guide, The Aerodynamics of Heavy Vehicles: Trucks, Buses, and Trains, October 15, 2004. Springer.

c Based on bias ply tires.

d Assumed by National Research Council committee.

e Reducing Heavy-Duty Long Haul Combination Truck Fuel Consumption and CO2 Emissions, NESCCAF/ICCT, Miller ed., October, 2009; and Cd same as the DOE 2006 21st Century Truck Roadmap and Technical White Papers. Doc No. 21CTP-003, December, Washington, D.C.

Page
170