Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 55
REFERENCES Ball, Deborah Yarsike and Theodore P. Gerber. 2004. Will Russian Scientists Go Rogue? A Survey on the Threat and the Impact of Western Assistance. PONARS Policy Memo 357. Available at: http://www.gwu.edu/~ieresgwu/assets/docs/ponars/pm_0357.pdf; accessed July 19, 2011. Davis, Paul C. 2002. Analytic Architecture Capabilities Based Planning, Mission-System Analysis, and Transformation. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Publishing. Department of Defense (DoD). 2003a. Defense Security Cooperation Agency. Directive Number 5105.65 issued October 31, 2000 (Incorporating Change 1, September 23, 2003). Available at: http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/510565p.pdf; accessed January 11, 2012. DoD. 2003b. Defense Acquisition System. Directive Number 5000.1 (DoD 5000.1), May 12, 2003. Available at: http://www.ntip.navy.mil/cap/documents/500001p.pdf; accessed January 11, 2012. DoD. 2003c. Operation of the Defense Acquisition System. Instruction Number 5000.2 (DoD I 5000.1), May 12, 2003. Available at: http://www.carlisle.army.mil/dime/documents/JPLD_AY08_Lsn%207_Reading%203_DoDI%2 05000-2.pdf; accessed January 11, 2012. DoD. 2011. Defense Acquisition Guidebook. Available at: http://at.dod.mil/docs/DefenseAcquisitionGuidebook.pdf; accessed January 11, 2012. Government Accountability Office (GAO). 2003. Information Technology, A Framework for Assessing and Improving Enterprise Architecture Management (Version 1.1). GAO-03-584-G. Available at: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03584g.pdf; accessed January 11, 2012. GAO. 2011. Border Security. Preliminary Observations on Border Control Measures for the Southwest Border. GAO-11-374T. Available at: http://www.gao.gov/assets/130/125500.pdf; accessed January 11, 2012. International Science and Technology Center (ISTC). 2011. Statement of the 53rd Governing Board of the ISTC. 28.06.2011. Available at: http://www.istc.ru/istc/istc.nsf/va_WebPages/GBStatement53EngPrint; accessed July 19, 2011. Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa H. 1993. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kirkwood, C. W. 1997. Strategic Decision Making: Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Spreadsheets. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning. 55
OCR for page 56
56 IMPROVING METRICS FOR THE DOD CTR PROGRAM Nacht, M. 2009. Memorandum for Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Nuclear and Chemical and Biological Defense Programs. Biological Threat Reduction Program Strategic Planning Guidance and Program Objectives. Available through the Public Access File for this study. National Research Council (NRC). 1997. Controlling Dangerous Pathogens: A Blueprint for U.S.-Russia Cooperation. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. NRC. 1997. Proliferation Concerns: Assessing U.S. Efforts to Help Contain Nuclear and Other Dangerous Materials and Technologies in the Former Soviet Union. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. NRC. 1999. Protecting Nuclear Weapons Materials in Russia. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. NRC. 2006a. Biological Science and Biotechnology in Russia: Controlling Diseases and Enhancing Security. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. NRC. 2006b. Strengthening Long-Term Nuclear Security: Protecting Weapon-Usable Material in Russia. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. NRC. 2006c. The Fundamental Role of Science and Technology in International Development: An Imperative for the U.S. Agency for International Development. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. NRC. 2006d. Threat Agent Detection Response System Data Base. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. NRC. 2007a. U.S.-Russian Collaboration in Combating Radiological Terrorism. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. NRC. 2007b. The Biological Threat Reduction Program of the Department of Defense: From Foreign Assistance to Sustainable Partnerships. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. NRC. 2008. Improving Democracy Assistance: Building Knowledge Through Evaluation and Research. NRC. 2009. Countering Biological Threats: Challenges for the Department of Defense’s Nonproliferation Program Beyond the Former Soviet Union. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. National Security Council. 2009. National Strategy for Countering Biological Threats. Washington, D.C. Parnell, G. S., Driscoll, P. J., and Henderson D. L., Editors, 2011. Decision Making for Systems Engineering and Management, 2nd Edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
OCR for page 57
REFERENCES 57 Revill, J. 2009. Developing Metrics and Measures for Dual-Use Education. Research Report for the Wellcome Trust Project on ‘Building a Sustainable Capacity in Dual-use Bioethics.’ Available at: http://www.brad.ac.uk/bioethics/media/SSIS/Bioethics/docs/Education_metrics_and_measures_2 nd_DRAFT.pdf; accessed January 11, 2012. Weber, A. 2010. Memorandum for Director, Defense Threat Reduction Agency. Subject: Implementation Guidance for: I. Cooperative Biological Engagement Program (CBEP) Activities in Pakistan; II. Improving Implementation Flexibility Across CBEP; and III. Pursuing Implementing Arrangements with International Organizations Relevant to the CBEP Mission.
OCR for page 58