References

Adolph, P. (2010). The acquisition/test process: What went wrong and how to fix the process. ITEA Journal 31:49-56.

Adolph, P., DiPetto, C.S., and Seglie, E.T. (2008). Defense Science Board task force developmental test and evaluation study results. ITEA Journal 29:215-221.

Bell, W.D. (2008). The 800-pound (364 kg) gorilla. ITEA Journal 29:275-277.

Bonder, S. (2000). Versatility Planning: An Idea Whose Time Has Come—Again! Steinhardt lecture presented at the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Conference, May 9, Salt Lake City, UT.

Box, G., Kackar, R., Nair, V., Phadke, M., Shoemaker, A., and Wu, C.F.J. (1988). Quality practices in Japan. Quality Progress March:37-41.

Bringmann, E., and Kramer, A. (2008). Model-Based Testing of Automotive Systems. Presented at the Software Testing, Verification, and Validation, 2008 1st International Conference, April 9-11, Lillehammer, Norwary. Abstract available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4539577&tag=1 [December 2011].

Center for Naval Analysis. (2009). The F/A-18E/F Super Hornet Development Program: Could This Success Story Be Repeated Today? G. Christle and D. Davis. CNA Analysis & Solutions report CRM D0021571.A2/Final. Alexandria, VA: Center for Naval Analysis.

Christie, T. (2011). Essay 10: Developing, buying, and fielding superior weapon systems. In W.T. Wheeler (Ed.), The Pentagon Labyrinth: Ten Short Essays to Help You Through It. Washington, DC: Center for Defense Information, World Security Institute.

Defense Science Board. (2000). Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Defense Software. Washington, DC: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, U.S. Department of Defense.

Defense Science Board. (2003). Acquisition of National Security Space Programs. Washington, DC: Defense Science Board/Air Force Scientific Advisory Board Joint Task Force; Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 65
References Adolph, P. (2010). The acquisition/test process: What went wrong and how to fix the pro - cess. ITEA Journal 31:49-56. Adolph, P., DiPetto, C.S., and Seglie, E.T. (2008). Defense Science Board task force develop- develop- mental test and evaluation study results. ITEA Journal 29:215-221. Bell, W.D. (2008). The 800-pound (364 kg) gorilla. ITEA Journal 29:275-277. Bonder, S. (2000). Versatility Planning: An Idea Whose Time Has Come—Again! Steinhardt lec- ture presented at the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Conference, May 9, Salt Lake City, UT. Box, G., Kackar, R., Nair, V., Phadke, M., Shoemaker, A., and Wu, C.F.J. (1988). Quality prac - tices in Japan. Quality Progress March:37-41. Bringmann, E., and Kramer, A. (2008). Model-Based Testing of Automotive Systems. Presented at the Software Testing, Verification, and Validation, 2008 1st International Conference, April 9-11, Lillehammer, Norwary. Abstract available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/ abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4539577&tag=1 [December 2011]. Center for Naval Analysis. (2009). The F/A-18E/F Super Hornet Development Program: Could This Success Story Be Repeated Today? G. Christle and D. Davis. CNA Analysis & Solu- tions report CRM D0021571.A2/Final. Alexandria, VA: Center for Naval Analysis. Christie, T. (2011). Essay 10: Developing, buying, and fielding superior weapon systems. In W.T. Wheeler (Ed.), The Pentagon Labyrinth: Ten Short Essays to Help You Through It. Washington, DC: Center for Defense Information, World Security Institute. Defense Science Board. (2000). Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Defense Soft- ware. Washington, DC: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, U.S. Department of Defense. Defense Science Board. (2003). Acquisition of National Security Space Programs. Washington, DC: Defense Science Board/Air Force Scientific Advisory Board Joint Task Force; Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. 65

OCR for page 65
66 INDUSTRIAL METHODS FOR EFFECTIVE DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING Defense Science Board. (2008). Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Developmental Test and Evaluation. Office of the Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. Available: http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/ADA482504.pdf [July 2011]. Gilmore, J.M. (2010). Director, Operational Test and Evaluation FY 2010 Annual Report. Avail- able: http://www.defensenews.com/static/defense_fy2010_dote_annual_report.pdf [December 2011]. Institute for Defense Analyses. (1991). The Role of the Office of the Secretary of Defense in the Defense Acquisition Process. Prepared for the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses. Available: http:// pogoarchives.org/labyrinth/10/01.pdf [December 2011]. Mathworks®. (2009). General Motors Develops Two-Mode Hybrid Powertrain with Model-Based Design. Press release. Available: http://www.mathworks.com/company/pressroom/ General-Motors-Develops-Two-Mode-Hybrid-Powertrain-With-Model-Based-Design. html [July 2011]. Meeker, W.Q., and Escobar, L.A. (1998), Statistical Methods for Reliability Data. New York: Wiley. National Defense Industrial Association. (2011). Final Report of Model Based Engineering (MBE) Subcommittee. Arlington, VA: NDIA Systems Engineering Division, M&S Committee. National Research Council. (1992). Combining Information: Statistical Issues and Opportunities for Research. Panel on Statistical Issues and Opportunities for Research in the Combina - tion of Information. Committee on Applied and Theoretical Statistics. Board on Math - ematical Sciences. Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Application. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (1998). Statistics, Testing, and Defense Acquisition: New Approaches and Methodological Improvement. Panel on Statistical Methods for Testing and Evalua- tion Defense Systems, M. Cohen, J. Rolph, and D. Steffey, Eds. Committee on National Statistics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (2003). Innovations in Software Engineering for Defense Systems; Oversight Committee for the Workshop on Statistical Methods in Software Engineer- ing for Defense Systems. S.R. Dalal, J.H. Poore, and M.L. Cohen, Eds. Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Wash - ington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2004). Improved Operational Testing and Evaluation and Methods of Combining Information for the Stryker Family of Vehicles and Related Army Systems. Phase II Report. Panel on Operational Test Design and Evaluation of the Interim Armored Vehicle, Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2006). Testing of Defense Systems in an Evolutionary Acquisition Environment. Oversight Committee for the Workshop on Testing for Dynamic Acquisi- tion of Defense Systems. V. Nair and M.L. Cohen, Eds. Committee on National Statis - tics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2008). Pre-Milestone A and Early-Phase Systems Engineering: A Retrospective Review and Benefits for Future Air Force Acquisition, Air Force Studies Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

OCR for page 65
67 REFERENCES National Research Council. (2010a). Achieving Effective Acquisition of Information Technology in the Department of Defense. Committee on Improving Processes and Policies for the Acquisition and Test of Information Technologies in the Department of Defense. Com - puter Science and Telecommunications Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2010b). Evaluation of U.S. Air Force Preacquisition Technology Development. Committee on Evaluation of U.S. Air Force Preacquisition Technology Development. Air Force Studies Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Nelson, W. (1990). Accelerated Testing Statistical Models, Test Plans and Data Analysis. New York: Wiley. Saunders, S.C. (2007). Reliability, Life Testing and the Prediction of Service Lives: For Engineers and Scientists. New York: Springer. Schwartz, M. (2010). Defense Acquisitions: How DoD Acquires Weapon Systems and Recent Efforts to Reform the Process. Congressional Research Service, 7-5700, RL34026. Available: http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL34026.pdf [December 2011]. Thompson, F. (1992). Deregulating defense acquisition. Political Science Quarterly 107(4): 727-749. U.S. Air Force. (2007). Technical Manual: USAF Deficiency Reporting, Investigation, and Resolu- tion. T.O. 00-35D-54. Available: http://www.tinker.af.mil/shared/media/document/ AFD-061214-036.pdf [December 2011]. U.S. Department of Defense. (2008). Operation of the Defense Acquisition System. U.S. DOD Instruction (DODI) 5000.02. Available: http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/ pdf/500002p.pdf [July 2011]. U.S. Department of Defense. (2010). Technology Maturity and Integration Risk of Critical Tech- nologies for CY 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense. U.S. General Accounting Office. (1992). Weapons Acquisition: A Rare Opportunity for Last- ing Change. GAO/ NSAID-93-15/December 1992. Available: http://www.gao.gov/ products/NSIAD-93-15 [December 2011]. U.S. General Accounting Office. (1998). Best Practices: Successful Application to Weapons Acqui- sitions Requires Changes in DoD’s Environment. GAO/NSAID-98-56. Available: http:// www.gao.gov/products/NSIAD-98-56 [December 2011]. U.S. General Accounting Office. (1999). Best Practices: Better Management of Technology Devel- opment Can Improve Weapon System Outcomes. Report to the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member, Subcommittee on Readiness and Management Support, Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate. GAO/NSIAD-99-162. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office. U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2004). Defense Acquisitions: The Army’s Future Com- bat System’s Features, Risks, and Alternatives. GAO-04-635T. Available: http://www.gao. gov/new.items/d04635t.pdf [December 2011]. U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2006). Best Practices: Stronger Practices Needed to Improve DOD Technology Transition Processes. Report to Congressional Committees. GAO-06-883. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office.

OCR for page 65