Adolph, P. (2010). The acquisition/test process: What went wrong and how to fix the process. ITEA Journal 31:49-56.
Adolph, P., DiPetto, C.S., and Seglie, E.T. (2008). Defense Science Board task force developmental test and evaluation study results. ITEA Journal 29:215-221.
Bell, W.D. (2008). The 800-pound (364 kg) gorilla. ITEA Journal 29:275-277.
Bonder, S. (2000). Versatility Planning: An Idea Whose Time Has Come—Again! Steinhardt lecture presented at the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Conference, May 9, Salt Lake City, UT.
Box, G., Kackar, R., Nair, V., Phadke, M., Shoemaker, A., and Wu, C.F.J. (1988). Quality practices in Japan. Quality Progress March:37-41.
Bringmann, E., and Kramer, A. (2008). Model-Based Testing of Automotive Systems. Presented at the Software Testing, Verification, and Validation, 2008 1st International Conference, April 9-11, Lillehammer, Norwary. Abstract available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4539577&tag=1 [December 2011].
Center for Naval Analysis. (2009). The F/A-18E/F Super Hornet Development Program: Could This Success Story Be Repeated Today? G. Christle and D. Davis. CNA Analysis & Solutions report CRM D0021571.A2/Final. Alexandria, VA: Center for Naval Analysis.
Christie, T. (2011). Essay 10: Developing, buying, and fielding superior weapon systems. In W.T. Wheeler (Ed.), The Pentagon Labyrinth: Ten Short Essays to Help You Through It. Washington, DC: Center for Defense Information, World Security Institute.
Defense Science Board. (2000). Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Defense Software. Washington, DC: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, U.S. Department of Defense.
Defense Science Board. (2003). Acquisition of National Security Space Programs. Washington, DC: Defense Science Board/Air Force Scientific Advisory Board Joint Task Force; Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics.
Defense Science Board. (2008). Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Developmental Test and Evaluation. Office of the Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. Available: http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/ADA482504.pdf [July 2011].
Gilmore, J.M. (2010). Director, Operational Test and Evaluation FY 2010 Annual Report. Available: http://www.defensenews.com/static/defense_fy2010_dote_annual_report.pdf [December 2011].
Institute for Defense Analyses. (1991). The Role of the Office of the Secretary of Defense in the Defense Acquisition Process. Prepared for the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses. Available: http://pogoarchives.org/labyrinth/10/01.pdf [December 2011].
Mathworks®. (2009). General Motors Develops Two-Mode Hybrid Powertrain with Model-Based Design. Press release. Available: http://www.mathworks.com/company/pressroom/General-Motors-Develops-Two-Mode-Hybrid-Powertrain-With-Model-Based-Design.html [July 2011].
Meeker, W.Q., and Escobar, L.A. (1998), Statistical Methods for Reliability Data. New York: Wiley.
National Defense Industrial Association. (2011). Final Report of Model Based Engineering (MBE) Subcommittee. Arlington, VA: NDIA Systems Engineering Division, M&S Committee.
National Research Council. (1992). Combining Information: Statistical Issues and Opportunities for Research. Panel on Statistical Issues and Opportunities for Research in the Combination of Information. Committee on Applied and Theoretical Statistics. Board on Mathematical Sciences. Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Application. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (1998). Statistics, Testing, and Defense Acquisition: New Approaches and Methodological Improvement. Panel on Statistical Methods for Testing and Evaluation Defense Systems, M. Cohen, J. Rolph, and D. Steffey, Eds. Committee on National Statistics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2003). Innovations in Software Engineering for Defense Systems; Oversight Committee for the Workshop on Statistical Methods in Software Engineering for Defense Systems. S.R. Dalal, J.H. Poore, and M.L. Cohen, Eds. Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2004). Improved Operational Testing and Evaluation and Methods of Combining Information for the Stryker Family of Vehicles and Related Army Systems. Phase II Report. Panel on Operational Test Design and Evaluation of the Interim Armored Vehicle, Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2006). Testing of Defense Systems in an Evolutionary Acquisition Environment. Oversight Committee for the Workshop on Testing for Dynamic Acquisition of Defense Systems. V. Nair and M.L. Cohen, Eds. Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2008). Pre-Milestone A and Early-Phase Systems Engineering: A Retrospective Review and Benefits for Future Air Force Acquisition, Air Force Studies Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2010a). Achieving Effective Acquisition of Information Technology in the Department of Defense. Committee on Improving Processes and Policies for the Acquisition and Test of Information Technologies in the Department of Defense. Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2010b). Evaluation of U.S. Air Force Preacquisition Technology Development. Committee on Evaluation of U.S. Air Force Preacquisition Technology Development. Air Force Studies Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Nelson, W. (1990). Accelerated Testing Statistical Models, Test Plans and Data Analysis. New York: Wiley.
Saunders, S.C. (2007). Reliability, Life Testing and the Prediction of Service Lives: For Engineers and Scientists. New York: Springer.
Schwartz, M. (2010). Defense Acquisitions: How DoD Acquires Weapon Systems and Recent Efforts to Reform the Process. Congressional Research Service, 7-5700, RL34026. Available: http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL34026.pdf [December 2011].
Thompson, F. (1992). Deregulating defense acquisition. Political Science Quarterly 107(4): 727-749.
U.S. Air Force. (2007). Technical Manual: USAF Deficiency Reporting, Investigation, and Resolution. T.O. 00-35D-54. Available: http://www.tinker.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-061214-036.pdf [December 2011].
U.S. Department of Defense. (2008). Operation of the Defense Acquisition System. U.S. DOD Instruction (DODI) 5000.02. Available: http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/500002p.pdf [July 2011].
U.S. Department of Defense. (2010). Technology Maturity and Integration Risk of Critical Technologies for CY 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1992). Weapons Acquisition: A Rare Opportunity for Lasting Change. GAO/ NSAID-93-15/December 1992. Available: http://www.gao.gov/products/NSIAD-93-15 [December 2011].
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1998). Best Practices: Successful Application to Weapons Acquisitions Requires Changes in DoD’s Environment. GAO/NSAID-98-56. Available: http://www.gao.gov/products/NSIAD-98-56 [December 2011].
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1999). Best Practices: Better Management of Technology Development Can Improve Weapon System Outcomes. Report to the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member, Subcommittee on Readiness and Management Support, Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate. GAO/NSIAD-99-162. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2004). Defense Acquisitions: The Army’s Future Combat System’s Features, Risks, and Alternatives. GAO-04-635T. Available: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d04635t.pdf [December 2011].
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2006). Best Practices: Stronger Practices Needed to Improve DOD Technology Transition Processes. Report to Congressional Committees. GAO-06-883. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office.