From March to September 2011, the committee heard from various stakeholders in the United States and abroad. In the foreign workshops the travel delegations met government regulators from a dozen different low- and middle-income countries (see Appendix E). It also met with representatives of multinational and national food and medical companies, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), regional economic organizations, donor organizations, and universities (see Appendix E). In its deliberations the committee synthesized what it learned in these workshops, identifying nine common problems that cut across countries and industries. These are the nine main problems on which the committee focused its discussions. This input and background research informed its analysis of the main issues developing country regulators face.
The committee found that regulators abroad face problems with: adhering to international standards, controlling supply chains, infrastructure, their laws, their workforce, institutional fragmentation, surveillance, communication, and political will. A detailed analysis of each of these gaps follows.
ADHERENCE TO INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
One of the main responsibilities of a regulator is to ensure the food and medical product supply meets agreed upon standards for safety and quality. National regulatory authorities are entitled to set their own standards, but established international norms are expedient to use; they also facilitate trade. Some standards are set into a country’s legal code, others are set by private organizations or corporations (Giovannucci and Purcell, 2008).
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 79
3
Critical Issues
From March to September 2011, the committee heard from various
stakeholders in the United States and abroad. In the foreign workshops
the travel delegations met government regulators from a dozen different
low- and middle-income countries (see Appendix E). It also met with rep-
resentatives of multinational and national food and medical companies,
nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), regional economic organizations,
donor organizations, and universities (see Appendix E). In its deliberations
the committee synthesized what it learned in these workshops, identifying
nine common problems that cut across countries and industries. These are
the nine main problems on which the committee focused its discussions.
This input and background research informed its analysis of the main issues
developing country regulators face.
The committee found that regulators abroad face problems with: adher-
ing to international standards, controlling supply chains, infrastructure, their
laws, their workforce, institutional fragmentation, surveillance, communica-
tion, and political will. A detailed analysis of each of these gaps follows.
ADHERENCE TO INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
One of the main responsibilities of a regulator is to ensure the food and
medical product supply meets agreed upon standards for safety and quality.
National regulatory authorities are entitled to set their own standards, but
established international norms are expedient to use; they also facilitate
trade. Some standards are set into a country’s legal code, others are set by
private organizations or corporations (Giovannucci and Purcell, 2008).
79
OCR for page 79
80 ENSURING SAFE FOODS AND MEDICAL PRODUCTS
Standard setting is one of the regulatory authority’s main responsibilities,
separate from its responsibilities to enforce standards. For the purposes of
this section, standards means “established norms or codified requirements
for a product, such as material specifications or technical standards for
performance. Standards may be developed by regulatory agencies, public
organizations, or industry associations” (Marucheck et al., 2011, p. 714).
Tables 3-1 and 3-2 list some important organizations and describe their
work in standard setting.
Proponents of standards maintain that their use helps traceability
through the supply chain, eliminates redundant audits, and when, harmo-
nized across markets, decreases bureaucracy. Others see standards as little
more than fines on poor countries because of the high costs of compliance
(Marucheck et al., 2011). A debate on this topic is outside the scope of this
report. Regardless of the reasons these standards exist, quality assurance
and adherence to international norms are essential as developing countries
introduce regulated goods into the global marketplace.
Adherence to Food Standards
Adherence to international standards is a problem in the agri-food in-
dustry in many low- and middle-income countries. In these countries there
is a large domestic market for products that stringent regulatory authori-
ties would reject. People in developing countries often do not demand, for
example, process certification or assurance of minimal pesticide residues.
This may be because they are often not aware of the public health risks
international standards aim to protect against. They may also assume,
sometimes incorrectly, that it is possible to assess the producer’s quality
practices at point of purchase when the market has few middle men. More
importantly, these countries still struggle to feed their citizens; concerns
about trace pesticide residues seem frivolous in comparison to hunger. The
threat of death from starvation in the next month will dwarf theoretical
cancer risks in 50 years.
In China, for example, food safety has only been an official priority for
the past 12 years (Gale and Buzby, 2009). It is especially difficult in such a
large country to keep the estimated 200 million farmers working plots of 2
acres or less abreast of good agricultural practices (Gale and Buzby, 2009).
China’s roughly 400,000 cottage industry food processers face similar chal-
lenges (Gale and Buzby, 2009).
The involvement of the least developed countries and their in-
stitutions in international standard setting organizations such
as Codex is often nominal. The Codex Trust Fund aims to correct
this by supporting scientists from the least developed countries and
small island nations to participate better at Codex (WHO, 2011a).
OCR for page 79
TABLE 3-1
International Standard Setting Organizations for Food
Year
Organization Established What they do What they set standards in
United States 1820 “USP establishes documentary and reference standards • Purity and identity of food ingredients
Pharmacopeial to ensure the quality and consistency of medicines, (USP, 2011a)
Convention (USP) dietary supplements, and food ingredients” (USP, 2008).
AOAC International 1884 AOAC International provides science-based expertise to de- • Single laboratory validation for botanicals
velop voluntary consensus standards or technical standards • Study validation
through stakeholder consensus and working groups (AOAC,
• Food microbiology
2011).
• Characterization of antibodies used in
immunochemical methods of analysis for
mycotoxins and phycotoxins (AOAC, 2009)
1947 • Food Products
International A network of national standards institutes from 162 coun-
Organization for tries (ISO, 2011a) that sets trade standards and fosters • Good Management Practices
Standardization (ISO) standardization activities (Giovannucci and Purcell, 2008b).
• Management systems for food safety
1952 • Procedures and references
International “The IPPC provides an international framework for
Plant Protection plant protection that includes developing international • Pest surveillance, survey, and monitoring
Convention (IPPC) standards for phytosanitary measures for safeguarding
• Import regulations and pest risk analysis
plant resources” (IPPC, 2011).
• Compliance procedures and phytosanitary
inspection methodologies
• Pest management
• Post entry quarantine
• Exotic pest emergency response, control,
and eradication
• Export certification (IPPC, 2011)
International 1962 ICMSF provides science-based guidance to both • Microbiological limits and criteria in food
Commission on government and industry on evaluating and controlling (ICMSF, 2011)
Microbiological the microbiological safety of foods (ICMSF, 2011). ICMF
Specifications for is not a standard setting organization. It is included here
Food (ICMSF) because of its valuable advisory role.
81
continued
OCR for page 79
TABLE 3-1 Continued
82
Year
Organization Established What they do What they set standards in
• Food quality and safety
Codex Alimentarius 1963 Codex is responsible for developing “food standards,
Commission guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice • Codes of hygienic or technological practice
under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program”
• Pesticide and food additive evaluation
(CAC, 2011). “The purpose of the program is to protect
• Limits for pesticide residue
the health of consumers, ensure fair trade practices
• Guidelines for contaminants (Henson and
in food trade, and promote the coordination of all food
Humphrey, 2009)
standards work undertaken by international governmental
and non-governmental organizations” (CAC, 2011).
OCR for page 79
TABLE 3-2
International Standard Setting Organizations for Medical Products
Year
Organization Established What they do What they set standards in
• Identification testing
United States 1820 “USP establishes documentary and reference standards
Pharmacopeial to ensure the quality and consistency of medicines, • Limit testing for impurities or related
Convention (USP) dietary supplements, and food ingredients” (USP, 2008). compounds
• Assays for drug substances and formulations
• System suitability testing (USP, 2011c)
• Product quality verification services for
drug substances and excipients used to
make over-the-counter and prescription
pharmaceuticals (USP, 2011d)
International 1947 A network of national standards institutes from 162 coun- • Requirements and testing methods for
medical devices (ISO, 2011b)
Organization for tries (ISO, 2011a) that sets trade standards and fosters stan-
Standardization (ISO) dardization activities (Giovannucci and Purcell, 2008b).
International 1990 The ICH “makes recommendations toward achieving • Good Clinical Practices
Conference on greater harmonization in the interpretation and application • Good Manufacturing Practices of medicines,
Harmonization (ICH) of technical guidelines and requirements for pharmaceutical biologics, and vaccines
product registration” (ICH, 2011).
• Standards for the transfer of regulatory
information
• Medical device safety, e ectiveness,
The Global 1992 The GHTF encourages the harmonization of regulatory prac-
performance, and quality (GHTF, 2007)
Harmonization tices related to ensuring the safety, e ectiveness, perfor-
Task Force (GHTF) mance, and quality of medical devices, promoting advance-
ments in technology, and assisting international trade. This
is accomplished through the publication and dissemination
of harmonized guidance documents on basic regulatory
practices (GHTF, 2007).
European Directorate 1996 The EDQM “protects public health by enabling the • Quality and safety of medical products
(EDQM, 2011)
for the Quality development, supporting the implementation, and
of Medicines and monitoring the application of quality standards for safe
Healthcare (EDQM) medicines and their safe use (EDQM, 2011).”
83
OCR for page 79
84 ENSURING SAFE FOODS AND MEDICAL PRODUCTS
Still, the poorest countries do not have representatives with sufficient
expertise to participate meaningfully in standard setting meetings (Afri-
can Union Interafrican Bureau for Animal Resources, 2011). Sometimes
logistical constraints complicate participation in these meetings. Inter-
national travel is too expensive for regulatory agencies to fund (World
Bank, 2008).
There is also evidence that, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa, the food
producers have no way to give input into standard development (World
Bank, 2003). This means that small- and medium-size enterprises, and
even some larger firms, rely on their importing agents or their national
regulatory authority to make information available. There are also too
few scientists qualified to analyze the standards. Without advocates these
countries become “standards-takers” rather than active participants in the
dialogue (World Bank, 2003).
It is expensive to adhere to international standards. At the very least it
requires a supplier to be able to trace products through the supply chain and
show proof of adherence to best practices at all stages of production. This
proof usually takes the form of a certificate of inspection, audit, or accredita-
tion. Producers pay for inspections and certification, and for small producers
these costs are prohibitively high (Giovannucci and Purcell, 2008). Some
agri-food standards, those on pesticide residues for example, rely on tech-
nical skills and laboratory equipment that are essentially missing in many
developing countries (Jaffee and Henson, 2004; World Bank, 2003). For all
these reasons, the World Trade Organization (WTO) called for donor aid
to improve developing countries adherence to standards in their Sanitary
and Phytosanitary (SPS) agreement. Bilateral and multilateral agencies spent
between $65-$75 million a year in the years after the agreement on building
capacity for agri-food health management (Jaffee and Henson, 2004). The
full benefit of these investments is yet hard to measure. There is a learning
curve when new technology is introduced to a sector, as well as a time lag
when new staff are trained to use it (World Bank, 2003).
In the meantime, the inability to adhere to standards deepens inequali-
ties in market access between counties (Belton et al., 2010). Only eight
countries, most of them in Latin American, account for two-thirds of all
fruit and vegetable exports from emerging economies (Stcichele et al.,
2006). Even these Latin American countries, with relatively advanced sys-
tems for maintaining standards, can be subject to border rejections, and
rejections cost middle-income countries about $1.8 billion in 2001 (Jaffee
and Henson, 2004). Border rejections are only a fraction of the income lost.
Econometric analysis indicates that China alone lost an estimated $8 billion
in export income in 2002 because of failure to meet standards (Lu, 2005).
The individual financial losses are also heavy. Vietnamese farmers who can
OCR for page 79
85
CRITICAL ISSUES
comply with supermarket standards earn about 400 percent higher profits
than those who cannot (M4P, 2006).
Access to export markets could improve the economies in some of the
least developed countries, and the health and social benefits of adhering to
standards cannot be understated. Aflatoxin, a food contaminant, accounts
for an estimated 25,200-155,000 cases of liver cancer a year, overwhelm-
ingly in countries without strict food standards (Liu and Wu, 2010). Even
in the United States roughly 3,000 people die every year from foodborne ill-
ness (CDC, 2011). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
estimates that food imported to the United States caused 2,348 illnesses
between 2005 and 2010 (CDC, 2012). Half of these outbreaks happened
in 2009 or 2010, and about 45 percent of them have a probable source in
Asia (CDC, 2012).
Globally, there are an estimated 155,000 deaths each year from food-
borne Salmonella infections alone (Majowicz et al., 2010). Adherence to
manufacturing and agriculture standards would improve working condi-
tions and protect the environment in many countries. Farming in accor-
dance with good agricultural practices, for example, improves soil quality
and prevents erosion (Poisot et al., 2004).
Adherence to Medical Product Standards
In many ways, problems in adhering to international standards in the
medical products industry are similar to those in agriculture and food.
Regulators in low- and middle-income countries depend on standards devel-
oped abroad; they often have minimal input into the standard setting
process. Even more so than with agri-food standards, adhering to drug,
biologics, and device standards demands sophisticated testing laboratories
and control of complicated supply chains.
The International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Require-
ments for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) is a stan-
dard setting organization for drugs; it has membership from European,
Japanese, and U.S. pharmaceutical industry associations, and the drug
regulatory agencies of 17 countries (Abraham, 2002; ICH, 2011a). ICH
activities generally focus on its member countries, but it is increasingly
working to improve good manufacturing practices around the world. It
held a training on the same for southern African regulators in Tanzania in
June of 2011, for example (ICH, 2011b).
As in the agri-food sector, developing countries are standard-takers
rather than standard-makers. This can cause problems. Until recently the
ICH guidelines on medicine shelf life, for example, failed to account for
stability in hot, humid climates (Kopp, 2006). A working group of South-
east Asian nations remedied this and brought attention to the problems of
OCR for page 79
86 ENSURING SAFE FOODS AND MEDICAL PRODUCTS
accepting ICH guidelines outside of ICH regions (Kopp, 2006). In other
cases, the solutions for the standard-takers are not as clear. Far more rich
countries than poor ones regulate diagnostics; of those that do only 68 per-
cent require regulatory review of clinical trial data, and trial data with as
few as 15 subjects are often acceptable (Peeling et al., 2010). When clini-
cians in developing countries use diagnostics developed abroad they base
their understanding of the tests’ predictive value on product inserts, values
that are not accurate if the disease prevalence in the trial population differs
from that in the population tested.
Even when international standards are available to regulators and are
appropriate, there are problems in adhering to quality standards if the med-
ical regulatory authority has insufficient funding or trained staff or both.
For example, one essential function of drug and biologic standards is to an-
swer the questions, “Is this drug what is says it is, in the stated strength, and
is it free of contaminants?” (Kenyon et al., 1994, p. 615). Quality-control
laboratories answer these questions, but many countries cannot afford to
set up and staff these laboratories (Leng and Matsoso, 2008). Outsourcing
quality control is one way around this; private companies can do quality
control for a national drug supply, as is the case in the United Kingdom.
Leng and colleagues recounted hesitation to use private laboratories in both
South Africa and Algeria though because of concerns about conflicts of
interests given that the quality-control laboratories in question worked for
both government and industry (Leng and Matsoso, 2008).
Developing countries also face challenges in implementing good manu-
facturing practices; the standards that ensure all manufacturing steps can
be reproduced and result in the desired products. These are of critical im-
portance in the production of vaccines and other biological products, given
the inherent variability in testing a biologically active product (Milstien
et al., 2009). The World Health Organization (WHO) Prequalification of
Medicines and Vaccines Program facilitates access to quality medicines and
vaccines for treating priority diseases. As Chapter 2 describes, this program
evaluates product safety, quality, and efficacy and serves as the grounds
for donor procurement. The vaccine and medicine companies that pass the
evaluation must meet good manufacturing practices and be overseen by a
competent national regulatory authority; it is the government regulator’s
responsibility to enforce manufacturing standards (Brhlikova et al., 2007).
In 2009 the WHO announced that it would withhold new prequalification
evaluations from Indian companies barring improvements to their national
regulatory authority (Milstien et al., 2009).
In the same way, some consumers see WHO prequalification as an
international vote of confidence in the national regulatory authority. On
March 1, 2011, the WHO recognized the Chinese State Food and Drug
Administration as compliant with international regulatory standards, a
OCR for page 79
87
CRITICAL ISSUES
decision that will allow for the eventual introduction of Chinese vaccines
into international use (Jia and Carey, 2011). This may help restore public
confidence in Chinese vaccine companies after a year of scandals. Sub-
standard rabies and hepatitis B vaccines were rumored to have killed or
sickened about 100 babies in Shanxi province in 2010; shortly afterward
a company in Jiangsu province also produced substandard rabies vaccines
(Jia and Carey, 2011).
WHO prequalification drives compliance with international good man-
ufacturing practices and gives incentive to improve government regulation.
Economies of scale keep small countries out of the vaccine prequalification
system. Similarly, WHO drug prequalification encourages adherence to
international standards, at least in emerging economies large enough to
support a manufacturing sector. Smaller countries depend on prequalifica-
tion in their drug procurement.
Pharmaceutical manufacture in most emerging economies was designed
for generics, and their drug innovation system suffers. Some developing
countries do not regulate human subjects’ protection in trials or require
peer review of human subject protocols by institutional review boards,
perhaps because governments see trials as a way for some of their citizens
to get medical care (Kelleher, 2004). Still, the richest countries are home
to 15 percent of the world’s population and 75 percent of drug trial par-
ticipants (Herring, 2011). Consistent adherence to international research
standards could change this and would give depth to the results of drug
trials, increase understanding of drug development, benefit patients in the
developing world, and improve the economies of least developed countries
(Herring, 2011).
CONTROLLING SUPPLY CHAINS
Food and medical product supply chains are complex and far-reaching.
In the United States, the 2002 Bioterrorism Act requires all parties in the
food supply chain to identify the immediate previous source of their prod-
ucts and the immediate recipient; known as one-up, one-back traceability
(Gessner et al., 2007). When every actor is responsible for one-up, one-back
reporting, it is possible to re-create the entire supply chain, even if no one
party has a complete picture of it. Traceability requirements are less clear
in medical products supply chains. During the 2008 heparin crisis neither
the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) nor Baxter was able to re-
create the heparin supply chain quickly; it took weeks to even get close
to the source. The exact identification of the responsible actors was never
possible (Pew Health Group, 2011). Multinational companies are exploring
radio frequency identification tags and two dimensional bar codes to trace
OCR for page 79
88 ENSURING SAFE FOODS AND MEDICAL PRODUCTS
products through their supply chains (McMeekin et al., 2006). In develop-
ing countries, controlling supply chains is even more of a problem.
The Food Supply Chain
Large multinational corporations such as Wal-Mart, Archer Daniels
Midland, ConAgra, Nestle, Cargill, and Unilever control a great deal of the
international food market. These companies have close relationships with
their suppliers; they can trace their supply chains in developing countries,
a considerable accomplishment considering that a granola bar contains
ingredients from half a dozen different countries (Figure 3-1) (Carey, 2007).
These companies monitor their supply chains using the principles of Hazard
Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP), described in Chapter 2.
There are five main links in the food supply chain: the farm, the packing
house, the transportation, the market, and the consumer (UC Davis Depart-
ment of Plant Sciences, 2011).
Over the past decade there has been a rapid growth in production of
high-value agriculture, premium products such as vegetables, fruits, and
animal products. Much of Africa’s high-value exports are grown in coun-
tries with high altitudes and year-round growing seasons and exported
to Europe (Okello et al., 2007). There are usually separate supply chains
feeding the export and domestic markets, with relatively little crossover.
High-value agricultural products are highly perishable; logistics, in particu-
lar the availability of airfreight space, play a significant role in their trade
USA: high fructose corn syrup, sugar,
wheat flour (produced & milled), whole
China: vitamin & mineral supplements
grain oats, sunflower oil, strawberry
puree, cellulose, red dye #40 (B1, B2, iron, folic acid), honey
Philippines: carrageenan
Scotland: sodium
alginate
India: guar gum
Italy: malic acid Denmark: Europe: citric acid
lecithin (soy)
FIGURE 3-1
Global sourcing of food ingredients.
SOURCE: Roth et al., 2008.
OCR for page 79
89
CRITICAL ISSUES
(Okello et al., 2007). Orders from retailers come in late at night once the
European markets are closed, but the crops are picked earlier in the day.
When the export order does not match what the supplier packed, the order
may end up in the local market, though usually the exporters cannot get
the same price that they would have in the European market (Henson and
Humphrey, 2009).
With the notable exception of one participant from Uruguay, the guests
at the various site visits for this study explained that there are two supply
chains in their countries: one for export and one for local consumption.
Standards are generally lower for the domestic market (Broughton and
Walker, 2010; Llana, 2010). At the New Delhi meetings for this report,
Indian participants mentioned that having two food safety standards does
not trouble them; some stressed that Indians take care to avoid food spoilage
at home by marketing daily and boiling their milk every hour. Others believe
that Indians have higher innate immunity to foodborne disease than West-
erners. Similar misconceptions are common in China (Roth et al., 2008).
Spoilage is one of the main problems in the domestic supply chain of
Workers in Honduras wash thousands of bananas a day, preparing them for evaluation.
Bananas that are exactly the right weight, length, and color are packaged and shipped
to the United States; those that are not acceptable are sold in Honduras.
SOURCE: © 2007 Sarah Axelson, Courtesy of Photoshare.
OCR for page 79
136 ENSURING SAFE FOODS AND MEDICAL PRODUCTS
Bate, R., and K. Porter. 2009. The problems and potential of China’s pharmaceutical industry.
AEI Health Policy Outlook 3(April):1-10.
Becker, G. S. 2008. Food and agricultural imports from China. Washington, DC: Congres-
sional Research Service.
Belton, B., M. M. Haque, D. C. Little, and L. X. Sinh. 2010. Certifying catfish in Vietnam and
Bangladesh: Who will make the grade and will it matter? Food Policy 36(2):289-299.
Benabdallah, G., R. Benkirane, A. Khattabi, I. R. Edwards, and R. S. Bencheikh. 2011. The
involvement of pharmacovigilance centres in medication errors detection: A questionnaire-
based analysis. The International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine 23(1):17-29.
Bester, A. 2011. The importance of food safety in Africa. http://www.howwemadeitinafrica.
com/the-importance-of-food-safety-in-africa/5043/ (accessed June 14).
Black, S., K. Mulholland, and N. A. Halsey. 2010. Developing sustainable funding for vaccine
safety infrastructure. Vaccine 28(5):1133-1134.
Blaser, M. J. 2011. Deconstructing a lethal foodborne epidemic. New England Journal of
Medicine 365(19):1835-1836.
Bollyky, T. J. 2009. Global health interventions for U.S. food and drug safety. Washington,
DC: CSIS Global Health Policy Center.
Brhlikova, P., I. Harper, and A. Pollock. 2007. Good manufacturing practice in the pharmaceuti-
cal industry. Working Paper 3. Paper presented at Workshop on “Tracing Pharmaceuticals
in South Asia,” University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, July 2-3.
Bridges, A. 2007. FDA bonuses spending to draw scrutiny. USA Today, July 17.
Brighton Collaboration. 2010. What we do: Capacity building. https://brightoncollaboration.
org/public/what-we-do/capacity.html (accessed November 3, 2011).
Broughton, E. I., and D. G. Walker. 2010. Policies and practices for aquaculture food safety
in China. Food Policy 35(5):471-478.
Byerlee, D., and K. Fischer. 2002. Accessing modern science: Policy and institutional options for
agricultural biotechnology in developing countries. World Development 30(6):931-948.
CAC (Codex Alimentarius Commission). 2011. Home page. http://www.codexalimentarius.
net/web/index_en.jsp (accessed June 14, 2011).
Carey, J. 2007. Not made in China. Business Week, July 30, 41-43.
Castillo-Salgado, C. 2010. Trends and directions of global public health surveillance. Epide-
miologic Reviews 32(1):93-109.
CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 2011. CDC estimates of foodborne illness
in the United States. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Emerging & Zoonotic Infectious
Diseases, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases.
———. 2012. CDC research shows outbreaks linked to imported foods increasing. http://
www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2012/p0314_foodborne.html (accessed March 16, 2012).
Chanda, R. R., R. J. Finchman, and P. Venter. 2010. A review of the South African food con-
trol system: Challenges of fragmentation. Food Control 21(6):816-824.
Chaudhuri, S., M. Mackintosh, and P. G. M. Mujinja. 2010. Indian generics producers, access
to essential medicines and local production in Africa: An argument with reference to
Tanzania. European Journal of Development Research 22(4):451-468.
Chen, D., and D. Kristensen. 2009. Opportunities and challenges of developing thermostable
vaccines. Expert Review of Vaccines 8(5):547-557.
Cheng, M. 2010. Britain bans doctor who linked autism to vaccine. Associated Press, May 25.
Chocarro, L., P. Duclos, K. Senouci, and J. Southern. 2011. Consultation on interactions
between national regulatory authorities and national immunization technical advisory
groups. Expert Review of Vaccines 10(9):1265-1270.
Chun, N. 2010. Middle class size in the past, present, and future: A description of trends in
Asia. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: The Asian Development Bank.
OCR for page 79
137
CRITICAL ISSUES
Clark, D. J. 2003. Product counterfeiting in China and one American company’s response.
Washington, DC: National Defense University.
Clift, C. 2010a. Combating counterfeit, falsified, and substandard medicines: Defining the way
forward? London, UK: Chatham House.
———. 2010b. Meeting summary: Combating counterfeit, falsified, and substandard medi-
cines. London, UK: Chatham House.
Cohen, J. C. 2005. Corruption in the pharmaceutical sector. In Corruption in health. Boston,
MA: Boston University. Pp. 76-102.
Corbell, C., A. Stergachis, F. Ndowa, P. Ndase, L. Barnes, and C. Celum. 2010. Genital ulcer
disease treatment policies and access to acylovir in eight Sub-Saharan African countries.
Sexually Transmitted Diseases 37(8):1-6.
CSPI (Center for Science in the Public Interest). 2007. Combine all U.S. food safety functions
into a single agency, the Food Safety Administration: Support S. 654, H.R. 1148—the
Safe Food Act. Washington, DC: Center for Science in the Public Interest.
Day, J. N., T. T. Hien, and J. Farrar. 2004. Expiry-date tampering. Lancet 363(9403):172.
Denyer, S., and R. Lakshmi. 2011. Anna Hazare inspires young, middle-class awakening in
India. Washington Post, August 19.
Dilma tries to drain the swamp. 2011. Economist, August 20.
Donnges, C., G. Edmonds, and B. Johannessen. 2007. Rural road maintenance: Sustaining the
benefits of improved access. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization.
DRA establishment at federal level demanded. 2012. Daily Times, January 27.
EDQM (European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and HealthCare). Vision, mis-
sion & values. http://www.edqm.eu/en/Vision-Mission-amp-Values-604.html (accessed
September 21, 2011).
EMA (European Medicines Agency). 2011. Final report on the international API inspection
pilot programme. London, UK: EMA, Australian Government, and FDA.
EMA and FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration). 2011. Report on the pilot EMA-FDA
GCP initiative: September 2009-March 2011. London, UK: EMA and FDA.
Essack, S. Y., N. Shchellack, T. Pople, L. v. d. Merwe, F. Suleman, J. C. Meyer, A. G. S. Gous,
and D. Benjamin. 2011. Antibiotic supply chain and management in human health. South
African Medical Journal 101(8).
FAO and WHO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World
Health Organization). 2003. Assuring food safety and quality: Guidelines for strengthen-
ing national food control systems. Rome, Italy: FAO and WHO.
Farag, M., A. K. Nandakumar, S. S. Wallack, G. Gaumer, and D. Hodgkin. 2009. Does fund-
ing from donors displace government spending for health in developing countries? Health
Affairs 28(4):1045-1055.
FDA (Food and Drug Administration). 2011. FDA-industry PDUFA V reauthorization meet-
ing. Teleconference. Silver Spring, MD.
Freed, G. L., S. J. Clark, A. T. Butchart, D. C. Singer, and M. M. Davis. 2010. Parental vaccine
safety concerns in 2009. Pediatrics 125(4):654-659.
Freeman, C. W. 2009. China’s capacity to manage infectious diseases: Global implications.
Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Frerichs, R. R. 1991. Epidemiologic surveillance in developing countries. Annual Review of
Public Health 12(1):257-280.
GACVS (Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety) and WHO Secretariat. 2009. Global
safety of vaccines: Strengthening systems for monitoring, management and the role of
GACVS. Expert Reviews Vaccines 8(6):705-716.
Gale, F., and C. J. Buzby. 2009. Imports from China and food safety issues. Economic Infor-
mation Bulletin 52(January 14). http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/eib52/.
OCR for page 79
138 ENSURING SAFE FOODS AND MEDICAL PRODUCTS
GAO (Government Accountability Office). 2010. Drug safety: FDA has conducted more
foreign inspections and begun to improve its information on foreign establishments but
more progess is needed. GAO-10-961. Washington, DC: GAO.
Garrett, L., and Y. Huang. 2011. Food and drugs: Can safety be ensured in a time of increased
globalization? Washington, DC: Council on Foreign Relations.
Genetics and Public Policy Center. 2010. Reproductive genetic testing: A regulatory patchwork.
http://www.dnapolicy.org/policy.international.php?action=detail&laws_id=63 (accessed
October 25, 2010).
Gessner, G. H., L. Volonino, and L. A. Fish. 2007. One-up, one-back ERM in the food supply
chain. Information Systems Management 24(3):213-222.
GHI (Global Health Initiative). The United States government global health initiative: Strategy
document. http://www.pepfar.gov/documents/organization/136504.pdf (accessed Febru-
ary 24, 2012).
GHTF (Global Harmonization Task Force). 2007. Overview and mission. http://www.ghtf.
org/about/overview.html (accessed September 23, 2011).
Giovannucci, D., and T. Purcell. 2008. Standards and agricultural trade in Asia. Tokyo, Japan:
Asian Development Bank Institute.
Global Fund. 2008. Procurement, supply chain management and service delivery of the Global
Fund grants to the government of India. Geneva, Switzerland: The Global Fund.
Global Pharma Health Fund. The GPHF-Minilab®—Protection against counterfeit medicines.
http://www.gphf.org/web/en/minilab (accessed November 9, 2011).
Godfray, H. C. J., J. R. Beddington, I. R. Crute, L. Haddad, D. Lawrence, J. F. Muir, J. Pretty,
S. Robinson, S. M. Thomas, and C. Toulmin. 2010. Food security: The challenge of
feeding 9 billion people. Science 327(5967):812-818.
Government of India. 2003. Report of the expert committee on a comprehensive examination
of drug regulatory issues, including the problem of spurious drugs. New Delhi: Govern-
ment of India.
Greene, W. 2007. The emergence of India’s pharmaceutical industry and implications for
the U.S. generic drug market. Washington, DC: Office of Economics, U.S. International
Trade Comission.
Guerin, O. 2012. Lahore grieves over heart pill deaths. BBC News, January 29.
Gundersen, L. E. 2001. Training needs in regulatory science for the biopharmaceutical indus-
try. Nature Biotechnology 19(12):1187-1188.
Gustavasson, J., C. Cederberg, U. Sonesson, R. v. Otterdijk, and A. Meybeck. 2011. Global
food losses and food waste: Extent, causes, and prevention. Dusseldorf, Germany: Food
and Agriculture Organization.
Hamburg, M. A. 2011. Advancing regulatory science. Science 331(6020):987-987.
Hampton, T. 2011. European drug agency under fire: Critics charge that trial data are too
inaccessible. Journal of the American Medical Association 306(6):593-595.
Hao, Z. 2012. Substandard cardiac drugs claim over 100 lives in Pakistan. http://english.cntv.
cn/20120206/113321.shtml (accessed Febuary 12, 2012).
Harris, G., and W. Neuman. 2010. Senate passes sweeping law on food safety. New York
Times, November 30.
Hawthorne, N., and C. Anderson. 2009. The global pharmacy workforce: A systematic review
of the literature. Human Resources for Health 7.
Hazell, P., and S. Wood. 2008. Drivers of change in global agriculture. Philosophical Transac-
tions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363(1491):495-515.
Henson, S., and J. Humphrey. 2009. The impacts of private food safety standards on the food
chain and on public standard-setting processes: Paper prepared for FAO/WHO. Rome,
Italy: FAO and WHO.
OCR for page 79
139
CRITICAL ISSUES
Herring, J. 2011. Consistent clinical research standards benefit patients around the world.
Nature Medicine 17(9):1036.
Hodgson, A. 2007. China’s middle class reaches 80 million. Euromonitor International, July
25. http://blog.euromonitor.com/2007/07/chinas-middle-class-reaches-80-million.html.
ICH (International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registra-
tion of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use). 2011a. ICH harmonisation for better health:
Official website. http://www.ich.org/ (accessed October 4, 2011).
———. 2011b. Southern African Development Community International Conference on
Harmonisation Quality Guidelines No 7 (ICH Q7) Training Venue, Arusha, United Re-
public of Tanzania, June 27-30. http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/Training/
SADC_Q7_workshop_June_2011/ICH_Q7_training_20June2011.pdf (accessed Septem-
ber 30, 2011).
———. 2011c. Vision. http://www.ich.org/about/vision.html (accessed September 21, 2011).
ICMSF (International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods). Purpose.
http://www.icmsf.iit.edu/main/home.html (accessed September 20, 2011).
International Life Sciences Institute–India. 2007. A surveillance and monitoring system for
food safety in India (under Food Safety and Standards Act—2005). New Delhi, India:
International Life Sciences Institute.
IPPC (International Plant Protection Convention). 2011. What we do. https://www.ippc.int/
index.php?id=what&no_cache=1&L=0 (accessed September 23, 2011).
Irwin, A., H. Rothstein, S. Yearley, and E. McCarthy. 1997. Regulatory science—Towards a
sociological framework. Futures 29(1):17-31.
ISO (International Standards Organization). 2011a. About ISO. http://www.iso.org/iso/about.
htm (accessed September 22, 2011).
———. 2011b. ISO 28620:2010. http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_
detail.htm?csnumber=44810 (accessed September 26, 2011).
Jaffee, S., and S. Henson. 2004. Standards and agro-food exports from developing countries:
Rebalancing the debate. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3348. Wash-
ington, DC: The World Bank.
Jahre, M., L. Dumoulin, L. B. Greenhalgh, C. Hudspeth, P. Limlim, and A. Spindler. 2010.
Improving health systems in developing countries by reducing the complexity of drug
supply chains. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Logistics and SCM
Research, Bordeaux, France, September 30-October 1.
Jeffery, R., and M. R. Santhosh. 2009. Architecture of drug regulation in India: What are the
barriers to regulatory reform? Journal of Health Studies II:13-32.
Jia, H., and K. Carey. 2011. Chinese vaccine developers gain WHO imprimatur. Nature Bio-
technology 29(6):471-472.
Juma, C. 2008. Learn to earn. Nature 456(n1s):15-17.
Kader, A. A. 2010. Handling of horticultural perishables in developing vs. developed countries.
University of California, Davis.
Kauffmann, J. R., R. Miller, and J. Cheyne. 2011. Vaccine supply chains need to be better
funded and strengthened, or lives will be at risk. Health Affairs 30(6):1113-1121.
Kelleher, F. 2004. The pharmaceutical industry’s responsibility for protecting human subjects
of clinical trials in developing nations. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems
38(1):67-106.
Kenyon, T. A., A. S. Kenyon, and T. Sibiya. 1994. Drug quality screening in developing coun-
tries: Establishment of an appropriate laboratory in Swaziland. Bulletin of the World
Health Organization 72(4):615.
OCR for page 79
140 ENSURING SAFE FOODS AND MEDICAL PRODUCTS
Kimball, A. M., M. Moore, H. M. French, Y. Arima, K. Ungchusak, S. Wibulpolprasert, T.
Taylor, S. Touch, and A. Leventhal. 2008. Regional infectious disease surveillance net-
works and their potential to facilitate the implementation of the International Health
Regulations. Medical Clinics of North America 92(6):1459-1471.
Kitinoja, L., S. Saran, S. K. Roy, and A. A. Kader. 2011. Postharvest technology for developing
countries: Challenges and opportunities in research, outreach and advocacy. Journal of
the Science of Food and Agriculture 91(4):597-603.
Kopp, S. 2006. Stability testing of pharmaceutical products in a global environment. The
Regulatory Affairs Journal 4.
KPMG International. 2006. The Indian pharmaceutical industry: Collaboration for growth.
The Netherlands: KPMG International.
Kshirsagar, N. A., S. Olsson, and R. E. Ferner. 2010. Consideration of the desirable features
and possible forms of practical indicators of the performance of pharmacovigilance
centres. The International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine 22(2):59-66.
Kumar, A. 2011. Past, present and future of pharmacovigilance in India. Systematic Reviews
in Pharmacy 2(1):55-58.
LaFraniere, S. 2011. In China, fear of fake eggs and “recycled” buns. New York Times, May 7.
Langer, E. S. 2008. Biologics regulation in India. BioPharm Internatiaonal 21(3).
Larson, H. J., P. Brocard, and G. Garnett. 2010. The India HPV-vaccine suspension. Lancet
376(9741):572-573.
Larson, H. J., L. Z. Cooper, J. Eskola, S. L. Katz, and S. Ratzan. 2011. Addressing the vaccine
confidence gap. Lancet 378(9790):526-535.
Leng, H. M. J., and M. P. Matsoso. 2008. Pharmaceutical and analytical quality control ser-
vices: Ownership or outsourcing—a South African case study. Drug Information Journal
42(2):161-173.
Liu, P. 2010. From decentralised developmental state towards authoritarian regulatory state:
A case study on drug safety regulation in China. China: An International Journal
8(1):110-137.
Liu, Y., and F. Wu. 2010. Global burden of aflatoxin-induced hepatocellular carcinoma: A risk
assessment. Environmental Health Perspectives 118(6).
Llana, S. M. 2010. Food safety: From Mexican farm, to Costco, to your plate. Christian Sci-
ence Monitor, October 23.
Losse, K., E. Schneider, and C. Spennemann. 2007. The viability of local pharmaceuti-
cal production in Tanzania. Eschborn, Germany: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische
Zusammenarbeit.
Lu, C., M. T. Schneider, P. Gubbins, K. Leach-Kemon, D. Jamison, and C. J. L. Murray. 2010.
Public financing of health in developing countries: A cross-national systematic analysis.
Lancet 375(9723):1375-1387.
Lu, W. 2005. Trade and environment dimensions in the food and food processing industries
in Asia and the Pacific: A country case study of China. Hangzhou, China: Department
of Agricultural Economics, Zhejiang University.
Lu, W., and S. Kjeldsen-Kragh. 2008. International food safety standards: Catalysts for
increased Chinese food quality? Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies 26(1):70-90.
Lugosi, L., and Battersby. 1990. Transport and storage of vaccines in Hungary: The first cold
chain monitor study in Europe. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 68(4):431-439.
Lukulay, P. 2011. Promoting the quality of medicines (PQM) program. Paper presented at
Strengthening Core Elements of Regulatory Systems in Developing Countries: Meeting
One, Washington, DC, March 3.
Lupien, J. R. 2007. Prevention and control of food safety risks: The role of governments,
food producers, marketers, and academia. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition
16(Suppl 1):74-79.
OCR for page 79
141
CRITICAL ISSUES
M4P. 2006. The participation of the poor in supermarkets and other distribution value chains.
Hanoi, Vietnam: The Asian Development Bank.
Maheshwar, C., and T. S. Chanakwa. 2006. Post harvest losses due to gaps in cold chain in
India. IHS Acta Horticulturae 712:777-784.
Majowicz, S. E., J. Musto, E. Scallan, F. J. Angulo, M. Kirk, S. J. O’Brien, T. F. Jones, A.
Fazil, R. M. Hoekstra, for the International Collaboration on Enteric Disease “Burden
of Illness” Studies. 2010. The global burden of nontyphoidal salmonella gastroenteritis.
Clinical Infectious Diseases 50(6):882-889.
Malkin, R. A. 2007. Design of health care technologies for the developing world. Duke Uni-
versity, Durham, NC.
Manson, K. 2011. ACT production: “The biggest challenge is access to the market.” Financial
Times, April 21.
Martin, D. S. 2007. Lawmakers push for change in food safety oversight. CNN.com, May 17.
Martins, R. d. M., M. d. L. d. S. Maia, E. M. d. Santos, R. L. d. S. Cruz, P. R. G. dos Santos,
S. M. D. Carvalho, H. K. Sato, M. T. Schermann, R. Mohrdieck, M. d. L. F. Leal, and
A. Homma. 2010. Yellow fever vaccine post-marketing surveillance in Brazil. Procedia
in Vaccinology 2(2):178-183.
Marucheck, A., N. Greis, C. Mena, and L. Cai. 2011. Product safety and security in the
global supply chain: Issues, challenges and research opportunities. Journal of Operations
Management 29(7-8):707-720.
Matowe, L., P. Waako, R. Adome, I. Kibwage, O. Minzi, and E. Bienvenu. 2008. A strategy
to improve skills in pharmaceutical supply management in East Africa: The regional
technical resource collaboration for pharmaceutical management. Human Resources for
Health 6(1):30.
May, M. 2011. FDA reorganization inspires hope for better coordination. Nature Medicine
17(9):1024-1024.
McMeekin, T. A., J. Baranyi, J. Bowman, P. Dalgaard, M. Kirk, T. Ross, S. Schmid, and M. H.
Zwietering. 2006. Information systems in food safety management. International Journal
of Food Microbiology 112(3):181-194.
Milstien, J., A. Costa, S. Jadhav, and R. Dhere. 2009. Reaching international GMP standards
for vaccine production: Challenges for developing countries. Expert Review of Vaccines
8(5):559-566.
Moran, M., J. Guzman, A.-L. Ropars, A. McDonald, N. Jameson, B. Omune, S. Ryan, and L.
Wu. 2009. Neglected disease research and development: How much are we really spend-
ing? PLoS Med 6(2):e1000030.
Moran, M., N. Strub-Wourgaft, J. Guzman, P. Boulet, L. Wu, and B. Pecoul. 2011. Reg-
istering new drugs for low-income countries: The African challenge. PLoS Medicine
8(2):e1000411.
Morel, C. M., J. R. Carvalheiro, C. N. P. Romero, E. A. Costa, and P. M. Buss. 2007. The
road to recovery. Nature 449(7159):180-182.
Mori, M., R. Ravinetto, and J. Jacobs. 2011. Quality of medical devices and in vitro di-
agnostics in resource-limited settings. Tropical Medicine and International Health
16(11):1439-1449.
Morroney, R., J. Arrieta, A. Belza, M. Biere, G. Castaneda, L. Funari, S. Gilbert, B. Marinaro,
and Y. Obando. 2010. Medical device regulation in Latin America. Rockville, MD:
Regulatory Affairs Professional Society.
Muchmore, A. I. 2010. Private regulation and foreign conduct. San Diego Law Review 47(2).
Narula, S. A. 2011. Reinventing cold chain industry in India: Need of the hour. Interview with
Mr. Sanjay Aggarway. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies
1(2).
OCR for page 79
142 ENSURING SAFE FOODS AND MEDICAL PRODUCTS
Nauriyal, D. K. 2006. TRIPS-compliant new patents act and Indian pharmaceutical sector:
Directions and strategy in R&D. Indian Journal of Economics and Business, Special
Issue, China & India 1:2-20.
Newport, F. 2010. Americans leery of too much gov’t regulation of business. Princeton, NJ:
Gallup.
Newton, P. N., M. D. Green, and F. M. Fernández. 2010. Impact of poor-quality medicines in
the “developing” world. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 31(3):99-101.
Ni, H.-G., and H. Zeng. 2009. Law enforcement is key to China’s food safety. Environmental
Pollution 157(7):1990-1992.
Norris, P., R. B. Dos Santos, D. Woods, and W. Tobata. 2007. Delivering medicines in a
challenging environment: The pharmaceutical sector in East Timor (a descriptive study).
Pharmacy Practice 5(4):145-150.
Okello, J. J., C. Narrod, and D. Roy. 2007. Food safety requirements in African green bean
exports and their impact on small farmers. Washington, DC: International Food Policy
and Research Institute.
Okie, S. 2010. Reviving the FDA. New England Journal of Medicine 363(16):1492-1494.
Olsson, S., S. N. Pal, A. Stergachis, and M. Couper. 2010. Pharmacovigilance activities in
55 low- and middle-income countries: A questionnaire-based analysis. Drug Safety
33(8):689-703.
Oluka, N., F. Ssennoga, and S. Kambaza. 2010. Tackling supply chain bottlenecks of essential
drugs: A case of Uganda local government health units. Paper presented at 4th Interna-
tional Procurement Conference, Seoul, South Korea, August 26-28.
Oxfam International. 2011. Eye on the ball: Medicine regulation—not IP enforcement—can
best deliver quality medicines. http://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/eye-on-
the-ball-medicine-regulation-020211-en.pdf.
PAHO (Pan American Health Organization). 2011. SANEVA—Adverse Event Sentinel Sur-
veillance Network for new vaccines. http://66.101.212.220/hq/index.php?option=com_
content&task=view&id=1033&Itemid=243 (accessed November 8, 2011).
Patel, M. M., V. R. López-Collada, M. M. Bulhões, L. H. De Oliveira, A. B. Márquez, B.
Flannery, M. Esparza-Aguilar, E. I. Montenegro Renoiner, M. E. Luna-Cruz, H. K. Sato,
L. d. C. Hernández-Hernández, G. Toledo-Cortina, M. Cerón-Rodríguez, N. Osnaya-
Romero, M. Martínez-Alcazar, R. G. Aguinaga-Villasenor, A. Plascencia-Hernández,
F. Fojaco-González, G. Hernández-Peredo Rezk, S. F. Gutierrez-Ramírez, R. Dorame-
Castillo, R. Tinajero-Pizano, B. Mercado-Villegas, M. R. Barbosa, E. M. C. Maluf,
L. B. Ferreira, F. M. de Carvalho, A. R. dos Santos, E. D. Cesar, M. E. P. de Oliveira,
C. L. Osterno Silva, M. de los Angeles Cortes, C. Ruiz Matus, J. Tate, P. Gargiullo, and
U. D. Parashar. 2011. Intussusception risk and health benefits of rotavirus vaccination in
Mexico and Brazil. New England Journal of Medicine 364(24):2283-2292.
PATH. 2012a. Project Optimize: At a glance. http://www.path.org/projects/project-optimize-
ataglance.php (accessed January 31, 2012).
———. 2012b. Rethinking the vaccine supply chain. http://www.path.org/projects/project-
optimize.php (accessed January 31, 2012).
———. 2012c. World’s smartest sticker. http://www.path.org/projects/vaccine_vial_monitor.
php (accessed January 31, 2012).
Peeling, R. W., P. G. Smith, and P. M. M. Bossuyt. 2010. A guide for diagnostic evaluations.
Nature Reviews Microbiology. http://www.nature.com/nrmicro/journal/v8/n12_supp/pdf/
nrmicro1522.pdf.
Pew Health Group. 2011. After heparin: Protecting consumers from the risks of substandard
and counterfeit drugs. Washington, DC: Pew Health Group.
Pirmohamed, M., K. N. Atuah, A. N. O. Dodoo, and P. Winstanley. 2007. Pharmacovigilance
in developing countries. BMJ 335.
OCR for page 79
143
CRITICAL ISSUES
Pisani, E., and C. AbouZahr. 2010. Sharing health data: Good intentions are not enough.
Bulletin of the World Health Organization 88(6):462-466.
Poisot, A.-S., A. Speedy, and E. Kueneman. 2004. Good agricultural practices—a working
concept: Background paper for the FAO internal workshop on good agricultural prac-
tices. Rome, Italy: FAO.
Politics in emerging markets: The new middle classes rise up. 2011. Economist, September 3.
Pornruangwong, S., R. S. Hendriksen, C. Pulrikarn, A. Bangstrakulnonth, M. Mikoleit, R. H.
Davies, F. M. Aarestrup, and L. Garcia-Migura. 2011. Epidemiological investigation of
Salmonella enterica Serovar Kedougou in Thailand. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease
8(2):203-211.
Prado, M. M. 2006. Independent regulatory agencies, patronage and clientelism lessons
from Brazil. Paper presented at Primera Conferencia Internacional sobre Corrupción
y Transpacencia: Debatiendo las Fronteras entre Estado, Mercado y Sociedad, Mexico
City, March 23-25.
———. 2008. The challenges and risks of creating independent regulatory agencies: A caution-
ary tale from Brazil. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 41(2):435-503.
Prakash, S. 2009. Evolution of regulatory system in India. India Journal of Pharmacology
41(5):207.
Ratanawijitrasin, S., and E. Wondemagegnehu. 2002. Effective drug regulation: A multi-
country study. Geneva, Switzerland: The World Health Organization.
Reuters. 2001. Baxter recalls kidney filters after deaths. USA Today, October 18.
———. 2010. E coli outbreak blamed on Egyptian fenugreek seeds. Guardian, July 5.
Roth, A. V., A. A. Tsay, M. E. Pullman, and J. V. Gray. 2008. Unraveling the food supply
chain: Strategic insights from China and the 2007 recalls. Journal of Supply Chain Man-
agement 44(1):22-39.
Roy, D., and A. Thorat. 2008. Success in high value horticultural export markets for the
small farmers: The case of mahagrapes in India. World Development 36(10):1874-1890.
Rumsfeld, J. S., and E. D. Peterson. 2010. Achieving meaningful device surveillance. Journal
of the American Medical Association 304(18):2065-2066.
Sabot, O., P. Yadav, and M. Zaffran. 2011. Maximizing every dose and dollar: The imperative
of efficiency in vaccine delivery. Seattle, WA: The National Bureau of Asian Research.
Sarley, D., V. Dayaratna, W. Abramson, J. Gribble, N. Quesada, N. Olson, and V. S. Betancourt.
2006. Options for contraceptive procurement: Lessons learned from Latin America and
the Caribbean. Arlington, VA, and Washington, DC: DELIVER, USAID–Health Policy
Initiative for the U.S. Agency for International Development.
Schlehuber, L. D., I. J. McFadyen, Y. Shu, J. Carignan, W. P. Duprex, W. R. Forsyth, J. H.
Ho, C. M. Kitsos, G. Y. Lee, D. A. Levinson, S. C. Lucier, C. B. Moore, N. T. Nguyen,
J. Ramos, B. A. Weinstock, J. Zhang, J. A. Monagle, C. R. Gardner, and J. C. Alvarez.
2011. Towards ambient temperature-stable vaccines: The identification of thermally
stabilizing liquid formulations for measles virus using an innovative high-throughput
infectivity assay. Vaccine 29(31):5031-5039.
Schoub, B. D., and N. A. Cameron. 1996. Problems encountered in the delivery and storage
of OPV in an African country. Developments in biological standardization 87:27-32.
Setia, S., H. Mainzer, M. L. Washington, G. Coil, R. Snyder, and B. G. Weniger. 2002. Fre-
quency and causes of vaccine wastage. Vaccine 20(7-8):1148-1156.
Sharma, A., L. Subramanian, and E. A. Brewer. 2008. Secure rural supply chain manage-
ment using low cost paper watermarking. NSDR ’08: Proceedings of the second ACM
SIGCOMM workshop on networked systems for developing regions, New York.
Sharma, R. K., M. Agrawal, and F. M. Marshall. 2009. Heavy metals in vegetables collected
from production and market sites of a tropical urban area of India. Food and Chemical
Toxicology 47(3):583-591.
OCR for page 79
144 ENSURING SAFE FOODS AND MEDICAL PRODUCTS
Sharma, V., and V. Ahuja. 2010. Training in post-authorization pharmacovigilance. Perspec-
tives in Clinical Research 1(2):70-75.
Sproxil. 2011. Sproxil—world-class brand protection for emerging markets. http://sproxil.
com/ (accessed October 19, 2011).
SPS (Strengthening Pharmaceutical Systems). 2010a. National pharmacovigilance systems:
Ensuring the safe use of medicines. Submitted to the U.S. Agency for International Devel-
opment by the Strengthening Pharmaceutical Systems (SPS) Program, Nairobi, Kenya,
August 16-18.
———. 2010b. Sentinel site-based pilot active surveillance pharmacovigilance in the Vietnam
ART program. Arlington, VA: USAID.
Stcichele, M. V., S. v. d. Wal, and J. Oldenziel. 2006. Who reaps the fruit? Critical issues in
the fresh fruit and vegetable supply chain (update). Amsterdam: Centre for Research on
Multinational Corporations.
Sudershan, R. V., P. Rao, K. Polasa, G. M. Subba Rao, and M. Vishnu Vardhana Rao. 2008.
Knowledge and practices of food safety regulators in southern India. Nutrition and Food
Science 38(2):110-120.
Suleman, F. 2010. Pharmacovigilance: Who is responsible and why should we care? South
African Pharmaceutical Journal 77(9).
Sutz, J. 2000. The university–industry–government relations in Latin America. Research Policy
29(2):279-290.
Swaminathan, B., T. J. Barrett, S. B. Hunter, R. V. Tauxe, and CDC Pulsenet Taskforce. 2001.
Puslenet: The molecular subtyping network for foodborne bacterial disease surveillance,
United States. Emerging Infectious Diseases 7(3):382-389.
Swaminathan, B., P. Gerner-Smidt, L.-K. NG, S. Lukinmaa, K.-M. Kam, S. Rolando, E. P.
Gutierrez, and N. Binsztein. 2006. Building PulseNet international: An interconnected
system of laboratory networks to faciliatate timely public health recognition and response
to foodborne disesase outbreaks and emerging foodborne diseases. Foodborne Pathogens
and Disease 3(1):36-50.
Todd, E. C. D., and C. Narrod. 2006. Agriculture, food safety and foodborne disease. Wash-
ington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
Todd, E. C. D., and S. Notermans. 2011. Surveillance of listeriosis and its causative pathogen,
listeria monocytogenes. Food Control 22(9):1484-1490.
UC Davis Department of Plant Sciences. 2011. Postharvest technology. http://www.plantsciences.
ucdavis.edu/plantsciences/outreach/postharvest_tech.htm (accessed January 12, 2011).
Umali-Deininger, D., and M. Sur. 2007. Food safety in a globalizing world: Opportunities and
challenges for India. Agricultural Economics 37:135-147.
UMC (Uppsala Monitoring Centre). The WHO programme. http://www.who-umc.org/
DynPage.aspx?id=98078&mn1=7347&mn2=7252&mn3=7322 (accessed November 4,
2011).
———. 2011. WHO programme members. http://www.who-umc.org/DynPage.aspx?id=
100653&mn1=7347&mn2=7252&mn3=7322&mn4=7442 (accessed November 28,
2011).
UN (United Nations). 2008. Advancing food safety in China. Office of the United Nations
Resident Coordinator in China.
UNAIDS (Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS) and WHO (World Health Organi-
zation). 2011. Pharmacovigilance for antiretroviral drugs: Rationale for including
pharmacovigilance in the proposal. Geneva, Switzerland: UNAIDS and WHO.
UNICEF (United Nations Children’s Fund). Child survival fact sheet: Water and sanitation.
http://www.unicef.org/media/media_21423.html (accessed November 4, 2011).
UNICEF and WHO. 2009. Diarrhoea: Why children are still dying and what can be done.
Geneva, Switzerland: UNICEF and WHO.
OCR for page 79
145
CRITICAL ISSUES
Upton, D. M., and V. A. Fuller. 2004. The ITC eChoupal initiative. Harvard Business Review
604(016):20.
U.S. Commercial Service. 2002. Contact China: A resource guide for doing business in the
People’s Republic of China. Beijing, China.
USAID (U.S. Agency for International Development). 2011. Supply chain management:
Providing quality medicines for people living with and affected by HIV/AIDS. http://
www.usaid.gov/our_work/global_health/aids/TechAreas/treatment/scms.html (accessed
November 29, 2011).
USP (U.S. Pharmacopeia). 2008. USP standards development. http://us.vocuspr.com/Newsroom/
ViewAttachment.aspx?SiteName=USPharm&Entity=PRAsset&AttachmentType=
F&EntityID=97277&AttachmentID=6026e674-9b0f-4b23-aced-85f8853d7da4 (accessed
September 23, 2011).
———. 2011a. Food Chemicals Codex—an overview. http://www.usp.org/fcc/ (accessed Sep-
tember 26, 2011).
———. 2011b. PQM in Asia. http://www.usp.org/worldwide/dqi/regions/asia.html (accessed
November 9, 2011).
———. 2011c. USP reference standards—an overview. http://www.usp.org/referenceStandards/
(accessed September 24, 2011).
———. 2011d. USP verified. http://www.usp.org/USPVerified/ (accessed September 26, 2011).
Vaidya, S. S., J. J. Guo, P. C. Heaton, and M. Steinbuch. 2010. Overview and comparison of
postmarketing drug safety surveillance in selected developing and well-developed coun-
tries. Drug Information Journal 44(5):519-533.
Vapnek, J., and M. Spreij. 2005. Perspectives and guidelines on food legislation, with a new
model food law. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Viotti, E. B. 2002. National learning systems: A new approach to technological change in
late industrializing economies and evidences from the cases of Brazil and South Korea.
Technological Forecasing and Social Change 69:653-680.
Voxiva. 2011. Voxiva: About. http://voxiva.com/company/about.html (accessed November 4,
2011).
Waste not, want not. 2011. Economist, February 26.
Watt, G. 2004. Expiry-date tampering. Lancet 363(9403):172.
Watts, J. 2011. Exploding watermelons put spotlight on Chinese farming practices. Guardian,
May 17.
Wertheim, H. F. L., P. Puthavathana, N. Ngoc My, H. R. van Doorn, N. Trung Vu, P. Hung
Viet, D. Subekti, S. Harun, S. Malik, J. Robinson, M. Rahman, W. Taylor, N. Lindegardh,
S. Wignall, J. J. Farrar, and M. D. de Jong. 2010. Laboratory capacity building in Asia
for infectious disease research: Experiences from the South East Asia Infectious Disease
Clinical Research Network (SEAICRN). PLoS Medicine 7(4):1-5.
WHO (World Health Organization). 2003a. Effective medicines regulation: Ensuring safety,
efficacy and quality. WHO Policy Perspectives on Medicines 007:1-6.
———. 2003b. Substandard and counterfeit medicines. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/
factsheets/2003/fs275/en/ (accessed November 9, 2011).
———. 2005. African Medicines Regulatory Harmonization Initiative (AMRHI): A WHO
initiative. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
———. 2007. Practical guidance for conducting a review. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
———. 2008a. International health regulations (2005). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
———. 2008b. What has been achieved so far. http://www.wpro.who.int/china/sites/fos/
achievements.htm (accessed October 4, 2011).
———. 2010a. Assessment of medicines regulatory systems in sub-Saharan African countries.
Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
OCR for page 79
146 ENSURING SAFE FOODS AND MEDICAL PRODUCTS
———. 2010b. Counterfeit medical products: International medical products anti-counterfeiting
task force: Report by the secretariat. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
———. 2011a. Codex trust fund: News. http://www.who.int/foodsafety/codex/trustfund/en/
(accessed November 21, 2011).
———. 2011b. General information on counterfeit medicines. http://www.who.int/medicines/
services/counterfeit/overview/en/ (accessed November 9, 2011).
———. 2011c. Global advisory committee on vaccine safety: About us. http://www.who.int/
vaccine_safety/about/indepth/en/index.html (accessed November 3, 2011).
———. 2011d. Global vaccine safety blueprint: Draft for discussion. Geneva, Switzerland:
WHO.
———. 2011e. An integrated approach to food safety and zoonoses: Building capacity to
detect, control and prevent foodborne infections. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
———. 2011f. Pharmacovigilance. http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/safety_
efficacy/pharmvigi/en/index.html (accessed November 28, 2011).
———. 2011g. WHO list of prequalified medicinal products. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO
———. 2011h. WHO list of prequalified quality control laboratories. Geneva, Switzerland:
WHO.
———. 2012. Risk assessment. http://www.who.int/foodsafety/micro/riskassessment/en/index.
html (accessed January 18, 2012).
WHO and the Global Fund. 2010. Minimum requirements for a functional pharmacovigilance
system. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO and the Global Fund.
Who runs global health? 2009. Lancet 373(9681):2083.
Wong, E. 2010. Officials in China at odds over food scandal. New York Times, March 2.
World Bank. 2003. Standards and global trade: A voice for Africa. Washington, DC: The
World Bank.
———. 2007. Unleashing India’s innovation. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
———. 2008. Training regulators in Africa. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
———. 2009. Implementation, completion and results report on a credit in the amount of
SDR 39.7 million (US$54 million equivalent) to India for food and drugs capacity build-
ing project. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
———. 2010. World Bank to help improve food safety in China. http://www.worldbank.org/
en/news/2010/05/13/world-bank-help-improve-food-safety-china (accessed November
21, 2011).
Xiaoguang, S., and Y. Fengqiao. 2010. Higher and professional education in India. Manila,
Philippines: The Asian Development Bank.
Yadav, P. 2009. Counterfeit drug resistance in the developing world: An assessment of incen-
tives across the value chain and recommendations of policy interventions. Washington,
DC: Center for Global Development.
Yu, X., C. Li, Y. Shi, and M. Yu. 2010. Pharmaceutical supply chain in China: Current issues
and implications for health system reform. Health Policy 97(1):8-15.
Zaidi, M. B., J. J. Calva, M. T. Estrada-Garcia, V. Leon, G. Vazquez, G. Figueroa, E. Lopez,
J. Contreras, J. Abbott, S. Zhao, P. McDermott, and L. Tollefson. 2008. Integrated food
chain surveillance system for salmoella spp. in Mexico. Emerging Infectious Diseases
14(3):429-435.
Zhen, L. H. 2004. Drug control authorities in China. Annals of Pharmacotherapy
38(2):346-350.