National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: E2: European Union
Suggested Citation:"E3: Pakistan." National Academy of Sciences and National Research Council. 2012. Biosecurity Challenges of the Global Expansion of High-Containment Biological Laboratories: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13315.
×

E3

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOSECURITY INITIATIVES IN PAKISTAN:
A COUNTRY REPORT

Anwar Nasim,1 Ph.D. and Erum Khan,2 MBBS, FCPS, M. Sc.
1Ministerial Standing Committee on Scientific and Technological Cooperation
2Pakistan Biological Safety Association and Aga Khan University Hospital

What high-containment biological research facilities exist in your country? What are the facilities’ main goals and priorities?

In Pakistan, many institutes work using BSL-1 and BSL-2 level facilities. The National Institute of Health, Islamabad has been working at BSL-2+ and is constructing BSL-3 facilities. BSL-3 facilities exist at Aga Khan University and Indus Hospital Karachi.

Priorities and goals vary among facilities. The National Institute of Health, for example, fulfils the 22 objectives defined in ordinance No. XLIII of 1980 including advising the Federal Government on disease control, investigating epidemics, developing an Institute of Tropical Diseases for Research and Training, developing a National Virus Reference Center, and functioning as a National Type Culture Collection Centre (http://www.nih.org.pk/). The BSL-2 and BSL-3 laboratories at Aga Khan University are private diagnostic laboratories that process routine clinical samples. The BSL-3 laboratory is primarily used for processing samples from patients suspected of Mycobacterum tuberculosis (TB) infection. The BSL-3 lab at Indus Hospital is used mainly for TB diagnosis.

What government organizations are responsible for safety and security of high-containment biological (high BSL) laboratories?

Responsible organizations include the Disarmament Division, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the National Biosafety Committee. Additionally, the Pakistan Biosafety Rules 2005 require organizations involved in biotechnology or genetic manipulation to have Institutional Biosafety Committees and to designate a Biosafety Officer.

If there are BSL laboratories in your country, are there established criteria for deciding:

a.   Whether or not to establish such facilities?

b.   What criteria are used to select the placement of such facilities?

c.   What criteria are used to decide what research will be conducted in such facilities?

d.   What scientific, technical and management advice is available to governments when making their decisions?

The Pakistan Biosafety Rules, 2005, which concerns genetically modified organisms, established the following entities:

•   The National Biosafety Committee whose responsibilities (related to genetically modified organisms) include establishing procedures and standards for risk-assessments, facilitating the exchange of technical advice, developing guidelines for assessing biohazards, informing individuals engaged in genetic manipulations about new biosafety guidelines, coordinating efforts to prepare for biological emergencies, and certifying and inspecting laboratories that intend to perform high-risk work.

•   The Technical Advisory Committee that examines applications and provides advice concerning work on and the release of genetically modified organisms.

•   Institutional Biosafety Committees

Criteria used to decide what research will be conducted vary between facilities. Research at the National Institute of Health, for example, fulfils the 22 objectives defined in ordinance No. XLIII of 1980.

Suggested Citation:"E3: Pakistan." National Academy of Sciences and National Research Council. 2012. Biosecurity Challenges of the Global Expansion of High-Containment Biological Laboratories: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13315.
×

1.   What standards exist for BSL laboratories?
No standard formulations have been devised or received from the Government of Pakistan. The National Institute of Health, Islamabad, for example, follows the criteria and standard guidelines devised by WHO, the United States CDC’s Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories (BMBL), and ABSA-Canada (Canadian Association for Biological Safety).

Additionally, in May 2005, The Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency issued National Biosafety Guidelines. The document provides guidelines on laboratory research, field trials, and release of genetically modified organisms.

2.   Have there been any BSL accidents in your country?

a.   If yes, how and why did accidents at high-containment facilities occur?

b.   How, to whom and when are they reported?

c.   Who has authority to investigate accidents?

d.   What disciplinary or legal actions can be taken?

   According to the Pakistan Biosafety Rules, 2005, the Technical Advisory Committee must be notified following any accident that could lead to the release of genetically modified organisms.

3.   Have any steps been taken to minimize BSL laboratories accidents? If so, by whom (i.e., regulation, voluntary measures, individual laboratory practices)?
In his December 6, 2010 address to the BWC Meeting of the States Parties, Ambassador Zamir Akram stated that, “The subject of Biosafety has been incorporated in the curricula of relevant university disciplines.”

The Pakistan Biosafety Rules 2005 require an organization involved in bio-technology or genetic manipulation to designate a Biosafety Officer.

Pakistan currently has three Biosafety organizations including the Pakistan Biological Safety Association (PBSA), which is affiliated with the National Core Group in Life Sciences (NCGLS) of the Higher Education Commission and the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) Committee on Scientific and Technological Cooperation (COMSTECH) and was started in 2008.

Additionally, a number of training activities and seminars on biosafety have taken place in Pakistan, and Pakistanis have participated in similar events abroad. For example, in 2009, Aga Khan University in Karachi held two seminars on Laboratory Biosafety and a National Training Seminar on Biosafety and Biosecurity Initiatives took place in 2007 in Islamabad. Similarly, Pakistanis attended the Asia Conference on Laboratory Biosafety and Biosecurity (Bangkok, Thailand, 2007); the Biosafety and Biosecurity International Conference: Healthier and More Secure Communities in the Middle East and North Africa Region (Casablanca, Morocco, 2009); the Biosafety and Biosecurity Risk Assessment and Risk Mitigation Training Event for Pakistani Bio-scientists (Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 2010); and the ICLS-COMSTECH-PAS International Conference on Conduct of Responsible Science: Safety, Security and Ethics (Islamabad, Pakistan, 2010).

4.   Have any steps been taken to increase security at BSL facilities? If so, by whom (i.e., regulation, voluntary measures, individual laboratory practices)?
In 2010, the Government of Pakistan’s Planning Commission issued a report on Biosafety and Biosecurity in Biological Laboratories that describes good microbiological practices and suggests that one lab in each province be brought into full compliance with BSL-2 practices and then used as a model.

In his December 6, 2010 address to the BWC Meeting of the States Parties, Ambassador Zamir Akram stated that, “the Inter-Agency Task Force on BWC issues has finalized ‘Guidelines for development of Code of Conduct for the Life Scientists’ and circulated them to all our national stakeholders.” Additionally, the documents were translated into the national language, Urdu.

Suggested Citation:"E3: Pakistan." National Academy of Sciences and National Research Council. 2012. Biosecurity Challenges of the Global Expansion of High-Containment Biological Laboratories: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13315.
×
Page 159
Suggested Citation:"E3: Pakistan." National Academy of Sciences and National Research Council. 2012. Biosecurity Challenges of the Global Expansion of High-Containment Biological Laboratories: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13315.
×
Page 160
Next: E4: Russia »
Biosecurity Challenges of the Global Expansion of High-Containment Biological Laboratories: Summary of a Workshop Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $46.00 Buy Ebook | $36.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

During July 10-13, 2011, 68 participants from 32 countries gathered in Istanbul, Turkey for a workshop organized by the United States National Research Council on Anticipating Biosecurity Challenges of the Global Expansion of High-containment Biological Laboratories. The United States Department of State's Biosecurity Engagement Program sponsored the workshop, which was held in partnership with the Turkish Academy of Sciences. The international workshop examined biosafety and biosecurity issues related to the design, construction, maintenance, and operation of high-containment biological laboratories- equivalent to United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention biological safety level 3 or 4 labs. Although these laboratories are needed to characterize highly dangerous human and animal pathogens, assist in disease surveillance, and produce vaccines, they are complex systems with inherent risks.

Biosecurity Challenges of the Global Expansion of High-Containment Biological Laboratories summarizes the workshop discussion, which included the following topics:

  • Technological options to meet diagnostic, research, and other goals;
  • Laboratory construction and commissioning;
  • Operational maintenance to provide sustainable capabilities, safety, and security; and
  • Measures for encouraging a culture of responsible conduct.

Workshop attendees described the history and current challenges they face in their individual laboratories. Speakers recounted steps they were taking to improve safety and security, from running training programs to implementing a variety of personnel reliability measures. Many also spoke about physical security, access controls, and monitoring pathogen inventories. Workshop participants also identified tensions in the field and suggested possible areas for action.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!