centers would complement conversion, because a large international facility would allow research to be done that would be more challenging than at a smaller facility. In addition, he observed that at such facilities it would be easier to manage high-quality MPC&A as well as physical protection because of the international attention that such facilities would receive, especially if such facilities were placed in nations with well-developed nuclear infrastructures. The suggestion regarding major international centers received support from several Russian participants.

REFERENCES

Bari, R. 2011. Estimation of Risk for Research Reactors. Presentation to the Research Reactor Conversion Symposium. June 10.

Chebeskov, A. 2011. An Approach to Proliferation Risk Assessment for Research Nuclear Reactors. Presentation to the Research Reactor Conversion Symposium. June 9.

Kuatbekov, R.P. 2011. Types and Designs of Prospective Research Reactors with LEU Fuel. Presentation to the Research Reactor Conversion Symposium. June 10.

Lemoine, P. 2011. Fuel Design and LEU Development for the Jules Horowitz Reactor. Presentation to the Research Reactor Conversion Symposium. June 10.

Zrodnikov, A. 2011. Power Development and Missions of Prospective Research Reactors. Presentation to the Research Reactor Conversion Symposium. June 10.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement