Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities for
Coverting U.S. and Russian Research Reactors
A Workshop Report
U.S. Committee on Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities for
Converting U.S. and Russian Research Reactors from
Highly Enriched to Low Enriched Uranium Fuel
Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board
Division on Earth and Life Studies
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL
OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES
Russian Committee on Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities for
Converting U.S. and Russian Research Reactors from
Highly Enriched to Low Enriched Uranium Fuel
Russian Academy of Sciences
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
Washington, D.C.
www.nap.edu
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page R1
U.S. Committee on Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities for
Converting U.S. and Russian Research Reactors from
Highly Enriched to Low Enriched Uranium Fuel
Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board
Division on Earth and Life Studies
Russian Committee on Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities for
Converting U.S. and Russian Research Reactors from
Highly Enriched to Low Enriched Uranium Fuel
Russian Academy of Sciences
OCR for page R1
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001
NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Govern-
ing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the
councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineer-
ing, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for
the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropri-
ate balance.
This study was supported by Award No. DE-DT0001743 TO4 between the Na-
tional Academy of Sciences and the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear
Security Administration, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation. Any opinions, findings,
conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the
author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizations or agencies
that provided support for the project.
International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-25320-8
International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-25320-9
Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press,
500 Fifth Street, N.W., Lockbox 285, Washington, DC 20055; (800) 624-6242 or
(202) 334-3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area); Internet, http://www.nap.
edu.
Copyright 2012 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America
OCR for page R1
The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society
of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to
the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare.
Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Acad-
emy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific
and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy
of Sciences.
The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter
of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engi-
neers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members,
sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the
federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineer-
ing programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research,
and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Charles M. Vest is presi-
dent of the National Academy of Engineering.
The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of
Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in
the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Insti-
tute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its
congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own
initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V.
Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine.
The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences
in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the
Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government.
Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the
Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy
of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to
the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The
Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine.
Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. Charles M. Vest are chair and vice chair, respectively,
of the National Research Council.
www.national-academies.org
OCR for page R1
OCR for page R1
U.S. COMMITTEE ON PROGRESS, CHALLENGES,
AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR CONVERTING U.S. AND
RUSSIAN RESEARCH REACTORS FROM HIGHLY
ENRICHED TO LOW ENRICHED URANIUM FUEL
RICHARD M. MESERVE, Chair, Carnegie Institution of Science,
Washington, District of Columbia
DAVID DIAMOND, Brookhaven National Laboratories, Upton,
New York
JAMES SNELGROVE, Argonne National Laboratories (retired),
Argonne, Illinois
RUSSIAN COMMITTEE ON PROGRESS, CHALLENGES,
AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR CONVERTING U.S. AND
RUSSIAN RESEARCH REACTORS FROM HIGHLY
ENRICHED TO LOW ENRICHED URANIUM FUEL
NIKOLAY LAVEROV, Chair, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
VLADIMIR ASMOLOV, Rosenergoatom, Moscow
VALENTIN IVANOV, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
BORIS MYASOEDOV, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
ANATOLY ZRODNIKOV, Rosatom Institute of Physics and Power
Engineering, Moscow
Staff
SARAH C. CASE, Study Director (through September 30, 2011),
National Academies
KEVIN D. CROWLEY, Study Director (from October 1, 2011),
National Academies
YURI SHIYAN, Liaison, Russian Academy of Sciences
TONI GREENLEAF, Administrative and Financial Associate, National
Academies
ERIN WINGO, Senior Program Assistant, National Academies
v
OCR for page R1
NUCLEAR AND RADIATION STUDIES BOARD
JAY C. DAVIS (Chair), Hertz Foundation, Livermore, California
BARBARA J. MCNEIL (Vice-Chair), Harvard Medical School, Boston,
Massachusetts
JOONHONG AHN, University of California, Berkeley
JOHN S. APPLEGATE, Indiana University School of Law, Bloomington
MICHAEL L. CORRADINI, University of Wisconsin, Madison
PATRICIA J. CULLIGAN, Columbia University, New York, New York
ROBERT C. DYNES, University of California, San Diego
JOE GRAY, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
DAVID G. HOEL, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
HEDVIG HRICAK, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York,
New York
THOMAS H. ISAACS, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
ANNIE B. KERSTING, Glen T. Seaborg Institute, Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory, Livermore, California
MARTHA LINET, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
FRED A. METTLER, JR., New Mexico VA Health Care System,
Albuquerque, New Mexico
BORIS F. MYASOEDOV, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
RICHARD J. VETTER, Mayo Clinic (retired), Rochester, Minnesota
RAYMOND G. WYMER, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (retired), Oak
Ridge, Tennessee
Staff
KEVIN D. CROWLEY, Director
SARAH C. CASE, Senior Program Officer
OURANIA KOSTI, Program Officer
TONI GREENLEAF, Administrative and Financial Associate
LAURA D. LLANOS, Administrative and Financial Associate
SHAUNTEÉ WHETSTONE, Senior Program Assistant
ERIN WINGO, Senior Program Assistant
JAMES YATES, JR., Office Assistant
vi
OCR for page R1
Acknowledgments
A
number of individuals and organizations contributed to the success-
ful completion of this report. The committee wishes to thank the
National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) and Dr. Jeffrey
Chamberlin, NNSA’s liaison to the committee, for supporting this project.
Of course, the success of this project is due in large part to the high-
quality presentations provided by the symposium speakers, who are listed
in Appendix A.
The U.S. committee also wishes to thank the Russian Academy of Sci-
ences (RAS) for hosting the symposium at its facilities in Moscow. Dr. Yuri
Shiyan, RAS liaison to the committee, served as the primary link between
the U.S. and Russian committees and provided effective and tireless sup-
port for both committees. Dr. Nikolay Arkhangelsky (Rosatom), Dr. Yuri
Cherepnin (Dollezhal Scientific Research and Design Institute of Energy
Technologies [NIKIET]), and Dr. Evegeny Ryazantsev (Kurchatov Institute)
provided helpful reviews and fact checking of the committee’s final report.
The committee extends special thanks to the staff of the National
Research Council for supporting this study. Study director Dr. Sarah Case
took the lead for organizing the symposium and was primarily responsible
for shaping the committee’s final report. Dr. Kevin Crowley, director of the
Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board (NRSB), assisted with report prepara-
tion and ably handled report review and publication. Ms. Erin Wingo skill-
fully managed the logistics for the committee’s U.S. meetings, the Moscow
symposium (in close consultation with Dr. Yuri Shiyan), and report prepa-
ration, review, and publication. Dr. Rita Guenther, staff for the Committee
vii
OCR for page R1
viii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
on International Security and Arms Control, and Ms. Toni Greenleaf of the
NRSB also provided valuable advice on symposium logistics.
This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen
for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with
procedures approved by the Report Review Committee of the National
Research Council (NRC). The purpose of this independent review is to
provide candid and critical comments that will assist the NRC in making
its published report as sound as possible and will ensure that this report
meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness
to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain
confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We thank
the following individuals for their participation in the review of this report:
• Pablo Adelfang, International Atomic Energy Agency
• Thomas Newton, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
• Jordi Roglans, Argonne National Laboratory
• Jasmina Vujic, University of California at Berkeley
Although the reviewers listed above provided many constructive com-
ments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the contents of
this report, nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release.
The review of this report was overseen by Rodney C. Ewing, University of
Michigan. Appointed by the National Research Council, he was responsible
for making certain that an independent examination of this report was
carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review
comments were considered carefully. Responsibility for the final content of
this report rests entirely with the authoring committees and the institution.
OCR for page R1
Contents
OVERVIEW 1
1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 3
2 CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES ASSOCIATED
WITH CONVERSION 21
3 REACTOR CONVERSION CASE STUDIES 61
4 MANAGING PROLIFERATION RISKS AND
MAINTAINING MISSIONS 89
APPENDIXES
A Symposium Agenda 103
B Committee and Staff Biographical Sketches 109
C Statement of Task 115
ix
OCR for page R1