Steering Committee for NASA Technology Roadmaps, National Research Council, National Academies. "4 Observations and General Themes." NASA Space Technology Roadmaps and Priorities: Restoring NASA's Technological Edge and Paving the Way for a New Era in Space. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
NASA Space Technology Roadmaps and Priorities
TABLE 4.2 Space Vehicle Avionics Technology Gaps Across the NASA Roadmaps
Avionics Technology Gap Area
Limits of Draft Roadmaps
Processing Speed and Data Throughput
High-performance computing is mentioned in TA 11 as a flight computing technology, but only based on use of multi-cores as a technical approach.
Discussion of data bus technology is absent except for (1) TA08 under Wireless Spacecraft Technologies and (2) wireless and optical networks addressed in TA 13 under Safety Systems technology.
In TA10, there is passing reference to possible radiation-tolerant benefits of nanomaterial-based electronics.
In TA11, only integrated circuits are identified as needing radiation-hard capabilities (as Flight Computing technology).
Reliable, Fault-Tolerant Processing
This area of interest is superficially mentioned in the TA11 under Flight Computing technology where it is addressed solely in the context of multi-core processing.
This area is not consistently identified across the draft roadmaps where these technologies are applicable.
This area is only superficially mentioned in TA08 under Electronics technology.
Finding.Crosscutting Technologies. Many technologies, such as those related to avionics and space weather beyond radiation effects, cut across many of the existing draft roadmaps, but the level 3 technologies in the draft roadmaps provide an uneven and incomplete list of the technologies needed to address these topics comprehensively.
Recommendation.Crosscutting Technologies. OCT should review and, as necessary, expand the sections of each roadmap that address crosscutting level 3 technologies, especially with regard to avionics and space weather beyond radiation effects. OCT should assure effective ownership responsibility for crosscutting technologies in each of the roadmaps where they appear and establish a comprehensive, systematic approach for synergistic, coordinated development of high-priority crosscutting technologies.
Grantz, A.C., Experimental Systems Group, Boeing Company. 2011. “TA-09 Entry, Descent, and Landing Panel Discussion,” presentation at the National Research Council NASA Technology Roadmaps Panel 6 Workshop in Irvine, Calif., on March 23. National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 2011. 2011 NASA Strategic Plan. NASA Headquarters, Washington, D.C.
NRC (National Research Council). 2009. America’s Future in Space: Aligning the Civil Space Program with National Needs. The National
Academies Press, Washington, D.C. NRC. 2010. Capabilities for the Future: An Assessment of NASA Laboratories for Basic Research. The National Academies Press, Washington,