Both the conditions that lead to the initiation of a seismic event and the factors that affect the magnitude of the resulting event are well understood. The conditions of initiation are embodied in the Coulomb criterion (involving a comparison of the shear stress on the fault to the fault frictional strength), while the magnitude of the seismic event is related to the area of the fault undergoing slip. Inducing a seismic event requires a triggering event that will either increase the shear stress or reduce the normal effective stress on the fault and/or reduce the fault frictional resistance, for example, an increase of the pore pressure that reduces the frictional strength to a level at which it is overcome by the driving shear stress. However, to cause a significant event requires activating slip over a large enough area; for example, a seismic event of M 4 involves a fault area of about 1.4 km2 (~0.5 square miles) and a slip of about 1 m (~39 inches).
Unfortunately, despite our understanding of the factors affecting the initiation and the magnitude of a seismic event, the values of the process parameters (such as the injection rate or the volume of fluids injected) that will trigger the seismic event and what magnitude the event will be are generally not possible to quantify. The inability to make these kinds of predictions is due to several factors: (1) fragmentary knowledge of the state of stress in the Earth; (2) lack of knowledge about the faults themselves, including their existence (if they have not yet been mapped) and their orientations and physical properties; and (3) difficulty in collecting the basic data (hydraulic and mechanical parameters, geometry of the geological structure, such as the reservoir) that are required to calculate the pore pressure and stress change induced by the fluid injection or withdrawal.
Nonetheless, the insights into the mechanisms causing seismic events allow us to make some broad conclusions. In processes involving fluid injection, the pore pressure increase is the dominant factor to be considered, as stress change can often be ignored. Any increase of the pore pressure above historical undisturbed values may bring the system closer to critical conditions. The probability of triggering a significant seismic event increases with the volume of fluid injected: the larger the volume injected, the more likely a larger fault will be intersected. However, injection of fluid in depleted reservoirs (such as in secondary recovery stimulation—waterflooding) is unlikely to create an earthquake, irrespective of the volume of fluid injected, if the pore pressure remains below preproduction values.
The transient region of high pore pressure that surrounds a newly created hydraulic fracture is not expected to be large enough for a significant seismic event to be triggered, except in rare cases where the new hydraulic fracture intersects or is very near an existing fault. Even in such cases, the magnitude of the event is expected to be small because a large fault area will not be affected.
The fluid injected in crystalline basement rocks is essentially transmitted by a network of interconnected fractures and joints. Because of the high transmissivity and low storativity