Cover Image

PAPERBACK
$62.00



View/Hide Left Panel

of these kinds of rocks, the potential exists to induce pore pressure increase at considerable distances from the injection well and thus trigger slip on faults that are located kilometers away from the injection source.

Seismicity induced by fluid withdrawal cannot be explained without taking into account the accompanying stress changes, which are associated with the large-scale contraction of the reservoir caused by pore pressure reduction or uplift caused by removal of a significant mass of hydrocarbons. The magnitude of the events can be potentially large, because the stress change takes place over areas that are similar in size to the reservoir. However, to trigger an earthquake requires the initial state of stress to be very close to critical, because the perturbation of the stress is minute compared to the magnitude of the pore pressure reduction. For example, in the well-documented Lacq gas field (France) the increase of the maximum shear stress was estimated to be about 0.1 MPa (1 bar) in regions surrounding the reservoir for a pressure drop of 30 MPa (300 bar) in the reservoir.

REFERENCES

Brown, E.T., and E. Hoek. 1978. Trends in relationships between in situ stresses and depth. International Journal on Rock Mechanics 15:211-215.

Fehler, M., L. House, W.S. Phillips, and R. Potter. 1998. A method to allow temporal variation of velocity in travel-time tomography using microearthquakes induced during hydraulic fracturing. Tectonophysics 289:189-202.

Grasso, J.-R. 1992. Mechanics of seismic instabilities induced by the recovery of hydrocarbons. Pure and Applied Geophysics 139(3-4):507-534.

Grasso, J.-R., and Wittlinger. 1990. 10 years of seismic monitoring over a gas field area. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 80:450-473.

Hanks, T.C., and H. Kanamori. 1979. A moment magnitude scale. Journal of Geophysical Research 84:2348-2350.

Heidbach, O., M. Tingay, A. Barth, J. Reinecker, D. Kurfeß, and B. Müller. 2008. The World Stress Map database release 2008, doi:10.1594/GFZ.WSM.

Hsieh, P.A. 1996. Deformation-induced changes in hydraulic head during ground-water withdrawal. Ground Water 34(6):1082-1089.

Jaeger, J.C., N.G.W. Cook, and R.W. Zimmerman. 2007. Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics, 4th ed. New York: Blackwell Publishing.

King, G.E. 2012. Hydraulic Fracturing 101: What every representative, environmentalist, regulator, reporter, investor, university researcher, neighbor, and engineer should know about estimating frac risk and improving frac performance in unconventional gas and oil wells. Paper SPE 152596 presented to the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, TX, February 6-8.

McGarr, A. 1991. On a possible connection between three major earthquakes in California and oil production. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 81(3):948-970.

NRC (National Research Council). 1990. The Role of Fluids in Crustal Processes. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NRC. 1996. Rock Fractures and Fluid Flow: Contemporary Understanding and Applications. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Nicholson, C., and R.L. Wesson. 1990. Earthquake hazard associated with deep well injection: A report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Bulletin 1951. Reston, VA: USGS. 74 pp.

Raleigh, C. B., J.H. Healy, and J.D. Bredehoeft. 1976. An experiment in earthquake control at Rangely, Colorado. Science 191:1230-1237.

Scholz, C.H. 2002. The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement