National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$42.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Deterrence and the Death Penalty (2012)
Committee on Law and Justice (CLAJ)

Citation Manager

. "3 Determining the Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: Key Issues." Deterrence and the Death Penalty. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
44
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Deterrence and the Death Penalty

regimes on murder rates will depend on more than the data that generate the estimates: the inferences will also depend on the validity of the theories used to construct the models on which the estimates rest.

REFERENCES

Andenæs, J. (1974). Punishment and Deterrence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Apel, R. (in press). Sanctions, perceptions, and crime: Implications for criminal deterrence. Submitted to Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28.

Becker, G.S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169-217.

Blumstein, A., and Wallman, J. (2000). The Crime Drop in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Blumstein, A., and Wallman, J. (2006). The crime drop and beyond. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2(1), 125-146.

Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame, and Reintegration. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2010). Capital Punishment, 2009—Statistical Tables. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Available: http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=2215 [December 2011].

Cook, P.J. (1980). Research in criminal deterrence: Laying the groundwork for the second decade. Crime and Justice, 2, 211-268.

Cook, P.J. (1986). The relationship between victim resistance and injury in noncommercial robbery. Journal of Legal Studies, 15(2), 405-416.

Cook, P.J. (2009). Potential savings from abolition of the death penalty in North Carolina. American Law and Economics Review, 11(2), 498-529.

Donohue, J.J., and Wolfers, J. (2005). Uses and abuses of empirical evidence in the death penalty debate. Stanford Law Review, 58(3), 791-845.

Durlauf, S., and Nagin, D. (2011). The deterrent effect of imprisonment. In P.J. Cook, J. Ludwig, and J. McCrary (Eds.), Controlling Crime: Strategies and Tradeoffs (pp. 43-94). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Espy, M.W., and Smykla, J.O. (2004). Executions in the United States, 1608-2002: The Espy File. Available: http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/executions-us-1608-2002-espy-file [December 2011].

Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2010). Crime in the United States 2009. Washington, DC: Author.

Frakes, M., and Harding, M.C. (2009). The deterrent effect of death penalty eligibility: Evidence from the adoption of child murder eligibility factors. American Law and Economics Review, 11(2), 451-497.

Gilovich, T. (1983). Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(6), 1,110-1,126.

Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.

Kleiman, M. (2009). When Brute Force Fails: How to Have Less Crime and Less Punishment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Levitt, S.D. (2004). Understanding why crime fell in the 1990s: Four factors that explain the decline and six that do not. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(1), 163-190.

Messner, S.F., Deane, G., and Beaulieu, M. (2002). A log-multiplicative association model for allocating homicides with unknown victim-offender relationships. Criminology, 40(2), 457-480.

Page
44